Krash-Out Patel is Directing Under the Influence

Anonymous
White House officials ‘openly discuss’ firing Kash Patel as FBI chief threatens to sue over report about ‘excessive drinking’
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/kash-patel-alcohol-fbi-mess-firing-the-atlantic-b2960378.html

White House officials are “openly discussing” who will be the next FBI director amid a bombshell report about current leader Kash Patel’s alleged excessive drinking and other concerning conduct.

Patel has threatened to sue The Atlantic after journalist Sarah Fitzpatrick’s report alleged the FBI director is deeply paranoid about being fired and often drinks to excess, alarming officials at the agency and beyond. Fitzpatrick responded that she stands “by every word of this reporting” and told MS NOW: “We have excellent attorneys.”

“People close to the director have said that he himself has expressed that he believes that he is about to be fired or that is imminent,” Fitzpatrick also told CNN Friday. “This is widely, widely discussed, I think, within Washington, behind closed doors. In fact, there are senior administration officials who are openly discussing who will be the next FBI director.”

The Atlantic report, published Friday evening, claimed that Patel is known to drink to the point of obvious intoxication at clubs in Washington, D.C. and his home city of Las Vegas, violating FBI conduct standards and potentially leaving the nation’s top law enforcement official vulnerable to coercion or exploitation.

The director’s drinking reportedly angered President Donald Trump, who is famously sober, and whose brother died from alcoholism-related health issues. Trump called Patel after the director was seen chugging beer with members of the victorious U.S. Olympic men’s hockey team to express his displeasure, according to the report.

Sources told The Atlantic that Patel’s alleged conduct at the helm of the FBI has alarmed officials about what would happen if the bureau was needed in a national crisis, such as a terror attack.

“That’s what keeps me up at night,” an unnamed official said.

Other claims in the report portray Patel in an unflattering light. On April 10, according to the magazine, the director flew into a paranoid “freak-out”over a technical issue with a computer system. The report claimed Patel thought it was a sign he was being fired and began calling aides and allies in a panic.

Word of the alleged meltdown reportedly spread quickly through Washington, D.C. and the White House received calls about who was really leading the FBI, according to The Atlantic.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We all know how this is going to go. There will be no lawsuit. He won't last the next 2.5 years. He'll eventually "Bongino" his way back to his podcast. It's just a matter of what month/day that happens.


Evidently, he is filing suit tomorrow. I hope he wins big.


He's not. And why would you hope he wins big? You know nothing about him or his behavior. Are you genuinely that brainwashed?


Do you think these idiots even know what the legal standard is for a defamation claim for a public figure?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We all know how this is going to go. There will be no lawsuit. He won't last the next 2.5 years. He'll eventually "Bongino" his way back to his podcast. It's just a matter of what month/day that happens.


Evidently, he is filing suit tomorrow. I hope he wins big.


He's not. And why would you hope he wins big? You know nothing about him or his behavior. Are you genuinely that brainwashed?


Do you think these idiots even know what the legal standard is for a defamation claim for a public figure?


It's just so hard to tell if these type of posters are trolling, "own the lib" brainwashed, or just dumb. Could be all of the above I guess.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We all know how this is going to go. There will be no lawsuit. He won't last the next 2.5 years. He'll eventually "Bongino" his way back to his podcast. It's just a matter of what month/day that happens.


Evidently, he is filing suit tomorrow. I hope he wins big.


He's not. And why would you hope he wins big? You know nothing about him or his behavior. Are you genuinely that brainwashed?


Do you think these idiots even know what the legal standard is for a defamation claim for a public figure?


Yep.
And I think The Atlantic has met that standard.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We all know how this is going to go. There will be no lawsuit. He won't last the next 2.5 years. He'll eventually "Bongino" his way back to his podcast. It's just a matter of what month/day that happens.


Evidently, he is filing suit tomorrow. I hope he wins big.


Why? Seriously, why? He's a joke. He needs to go. Don't you give a crap about having a competent FBI?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We all know how this is going to go. There will be no lawsuit. He won't last the next 2.5 years. He'll eventually "Bongino" his way back to his podcast. It's just a matter of what month/day that happens.


Evidently, he is filing suit tomorrow. I hope he wins big.


He's not. And why would you hope he wins big? You know nothing about him or his behavior. Are you genuinely that brainwashed?


Do you think these idiots even know what the legal standard is for a defamation claim for a public figure?


Yep.
And I think The Atlantic has met that standard.


Are you his girlfriend?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We all know how this is going to go. There will be no lawsuit. He won't last the next 2.5 years. He'll eventually "Bongino" his way back to his podcast. It's just a matter of what month/day that happens.


Evidently, he is filing suit tomorrow. I hope he wins big.


He's not. And why would you hope he wins big? You know nothing about him or his behavior. Are you genuinely that brainwashed?


Do you think these idiots even know what the legal standard is for a defamation claim for a public figure?


It's just so hard to tell if these type of posters are trolling, "own the lib" brainwashed, or just dumb. Could be all of the above I guess.


Judging from the past few years of comments, a good number seem to be below IQ 90 when many of the technical or legal aspects argued by these knuckle draggers probably requires IQ 120 with some background knowledge. Basically most of them are slurpers of slop who regurgitate whichever moron they heard it from.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We all know how this is going to go. There will be no lawsuit. He won't last the next 2.5 years. He'll eventually "Bongino" his way back to his podcast. It's just a matter of what month/day that happens.


Evidently, he is filing suit tomorrow. I hope he wins big.


He's not. And why would you hope he wins big? You know nothing about him or his behavior. Are you genuinely that brainwashed?


Do you think these idiots even know what the legal standard is for a defamation claim for a public figure?


Yep.
And I think The Atlantic has met that standard.


lol…I am sure that they are terrified and don’t already have witnesses and evidence.

My god I hope that he’s dumb enough to try.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


+1 Justice for Kashyap!

+ use wonky-eyed Kashyap emojis to show your support!


He looks at Wednesday on a calendar and can see both weekends 🤪
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:He is obviously the try hard kid who really wants to be with the in crowd but will never get there. Unfortunately, he is a grown man in his forties still doing this which makes it even more sad.

100%. What a loser.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:OOOPS! As I posted earlier, Jesse Binnall is an incompetent boob.

What is "intimidating" merchandise?

Hundred bucks says Kash wants the Punisher logo on all the FBI merchandise .
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What a load of crap.



Hey
@S_Fitzpatrick
I was Kash Patel’s Sherpa on the transition. I spent nearly all day everyday with him for 3+ months and have been with him frequently since.

I have never seen the type of behavior that you’re describing from him.

Your anon sourced story is BS.

Oh and by the way, it was no pressure campaign that got Kash confirmed. He did his homework, studied every brief I wrote him (and I wrote them all personally). If I sent him material at say 2am, he would respond with questions by 3am. He was always available and never hard to reach. Ultimately, he addressed any concerns senators had. He studied the law enforcement issues in each of their states and came prepared with plans, ideas, and questions for addressing the unique law enforcement needs of each state. THAT is who Kash Patel is and it’s why the FBI has been so effective in the last year.

I’ve never once seen him over drink. Not once. You are spinning that narrative because you know POTUS doesn’t view that favorably, even admitted as much in your story.

And I’m not hard to find. Pretty obvious why you didn’t reach out to me for comment.


So the MAGA guy that supports Kash and got him the job wants to argue against multiple separate sources from the FBI and the White House? Yeah sure I’m convinced.


He wants to stay in on the Trump money machine
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We all know how this is going to go. There will be no lawsuit. He won't last the next 2.5 years. He'll eventually "Bongino" his way back to his podcast. It's just a matter of what month/day that happens.


Evidently, he is filing suit tomorrow. I hope he wins big.


He's not. And why would you hope he wins big? You know nothing about him or his behavior. Are you genuinely that brainwashed?


Do you think these idiots even know what the legal standard is for a defamation claim for a public figure?


Yep.
And I think The Atlantic has met that standard.


lol…I am sure that they are terrified and don’t already have witnesses and evidence.

My god I hope that he’s dumb enough to try.


They are not terrified, I just heard an interview with them. They welcome a lawsuit, then the facts can be heard by all.
Anonymous
Kash does not look like alcoholic at all. You can easily say who is drinking a lot. Comey had huge bags under eyes from heavy drinking and everyone was silent on that.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Kash does not look like alcoholic at all. You can easily say who is drinking a lot. Comey had huge bags under eyes from heavy drinking and everyone was silent on that.


Uh huh. Trust me, bro…
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: