WTAF is up with Sentebale's latest lawsuit against Prince Harry?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

+100

This is how I see it too. The gossip mags may print unflattering things about stripping titles, but this just seems like more media lies.

I dunno. Tom Sykes claims to be well-connected, although as is often the case, his "sources" could just be his own whims. https://www.thedailybeast.com/prince-william-plots-bonfire-of-royal-titles-when-he-becomes-king/

I hope he strips h and m titles. They claimed they wanted out but continue to try to use it to make money.

The Sandrinham Summit document was very clear. "The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will become privately funded members of The Royal Family with permission to earn their own income and the ability to pursue their own private charitable interests."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

+100

This is how I see it too. The gossip mags may print unflattering things about stripping titles, but this just seems like more media lies.

I dunno. Tom Sykes claims to be well-connected, although as is often the case, his "sources" could just be his own whims. https://www.thedailybeast.com/prince-william-plots-bonfire-of-royal-titles-when-he-becomes-king/

I hope he strips h and m titles. They claimed they wanted out but continue to try to use it to make money.

I mean, Charles has any number of gift shops at his various residences, where he sells jam, china, dog bowls, and Burberry. The money goes into his pockets too, and not into renovations which are still picked up by British taxpayers. Zara Tindall has multiple brand deals. How is this different?

Charles is selling £395 corgi brooches. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/lifestyle/article-15735157/Kerching-Charles-JONATHAN-MARGOLIS-reveals-royals-cashing-tasteful-tat-including-395-corgi-brooch-2-000-Burberry-coats-money-going.html

How is this different?

All of the proceeds from the various shops go to The Royal Collection Trust. It's used to preserve art, artifacts, and items of historical interest that are on display to the public in the UK at various museums, castles, etc. I have no idea what kind of ownership interest the King has in this priceless collection- my understanding is that it's all in a trust and can't be sold off for his personal profit, but someone please correct me if I'm wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

+100

This is how I see it too. The gossip mags may print unflattering things about stripping titles, but this just seems like more media lies.

I dunno. Tom Sykes claims to be well-connected, although as is often the case, his "sources" could just be his own whims. https://www.thedailybeast.com/prince-william-plots-bonfire-of-royal-titles-when-he-becomes-king/

I hope he strips h and m titles. They claimed they wanted out but continue to try to use it to make money.

I mean, Charles has any number of gift shops at his various residences, where he sells jam, china, dog bowls, and Burberry. The money goes into his pockets too, and not into renovations which are still picked up by British taxpayers. Zara Tindall has multiple brand deals. How is this different?

The Highgrove shop profits are donated to charity (the King's Foundation).

I think Zara can probably do what she want as she's not a working royal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

+100

This is how I see it too. The gossip mags may print unflattering things about stripping titles, but this just seems like more media lies.

I dunno. Tom Sykes claims to be well-connected, although as is often the case, his "sources" could just be his own whims. https://www.thedailybeast.com/prince-william-plots-bonfire-of-royal-titles-when-he-becomes-king/

I hope he strips h and m titles. They claimed they wanted out but continue to try to use it to make money.

I mean, Charles has any number of gift shops at his various residences, where he sells jam, china, dog bowls, and Burberry. The money goes into his pockets too, and not into renovations which are still picked up by British taxpayers. Zara Tindall has multiple brand deals. How is this different?

The Highgrove shop profits are donated to charity (the King's Foundation).

I think Zara can probably do what she want as she's not a working royal.

Former MP and privy counselor Norman Baker has written two books about the royals' finances and suggests Charles pockets some of the proceeds from his gift shop sales. I have no idea who is right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

+100

This is how I see it too. The gossip mags may print unflattering things about stripping titles, but this just seems like more media lies.

I dunno. Tom Sykes claims to be well-connected, although as is often the case, his "sources" could just be his own whims. https://www.thedailybeast.com/prince-william-plots-bonfire-of-royal-titles-when-he-becomes-king/

I hope he strips h and m titles. They claimed they wanted out but continue to try to use it to make money.

I mean, Charles has any number of gift shops at his various residences, where he sells jam, china, dog bowls, and Burberry. The money goes into his pockets too, and not into renovations which are still picked up by British taxpayers. Zara Tindall has multiple brand deals. How is this different?

Charles and Zara both actually serve and respect the people of England.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

+100

This is how I see it too. The gossip mags may print unflattering things about stripping titles, but this just seems like more media lies.

I dunno. Tom Sykes claims to be well-connected, although as is often the case, his "sources" could just be his own whims. https://www.thedailybeast.com/prince-william-plots-bonfire-of-royal-titles-when-he-becomes-king/

I hope he strips h and m titles. They claimed they wanted out but continue to try to use it to make money.

I mean, Charles has any number of gift shops at his various residences, where he sells jam, china, dog bowls, and Burberry. The money goes into his pockets too, and not into renovations which are still picked up by British taxpayers. Zara Tindall has multiple brand deals. How is this different?

The Highgrove shop profits are donated to charity (the King's Foundation).

I think Zara can probably do what she want as she's not a working royal.

Former MP and privy counselor Norman Baker has written two books about the royals' finances and suggests Charles pockets some of the proceeds from his gift shop sales. I have no idea who is right.

Oh interesting. Yeah who knows.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

What makes him unkingly is his laziness. He's on another 3 1/2 week vacation as we speak, and this is his 3rd or 4th vacation this year. When he is "working," it's about once a week, and usually involves something dumb like barista cosplay, where he's rude to Kate, at some place that already has plenty of business. Also he flies celebs into his Earthshot event (btw an Epstein buddy was a major early backer), so he can do photo ops with them. And let's not start on him and Kate grabbing their 4th or 5th "forever home" last year, and kicking out a children's museum and dogwalkers.

I say all this as someone who wants the monarchy to succeed. Maybe in reduced form, give back some of those palaces, reform the duchy scams. As a 1/2 Brit, I do think it serves a purpose for national identity, fun etc. But William and Kate have really got to step it up if the monarchy is to survive, because the younger generation doesn't relate to the Waleses at all according to polls. You can tell the UK press is worried, too.

I don’t see William as lazy at all. Sounds like Sussex camp feeding the media

DP. You can look up the numbers yourself and see that William did substantially less work than his dad has while dealing with cancer and did less than 202 royal engagements in 2025. When you consider a countable thing is a zoom meeting with staff then that is basically nothing.

I think that you can argue that the royal work they do is basically useless and stupid but if you accept the job then it’s lazy not to do the work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

What makes him unkingly is his laziness. He's on another 3 1/2 week vacation as we speak, and this is his 3rd or 4th vacation this year. When he is "working," it's about once a week, and usually involves something dumb like barista cosplay, where he's rude to Kate, at some place that already has plenty of business. Also he flies celebs into his Earthshot event (btw an Epstein buddy was a major early backer), so he can do photo ops with them. And let's not start on him and Kate grabbing their 4th or 5th "forever home" last year, and kicking out a children's museum and dogwalkers.

I say all this as someone who wants the monarchy to succeed. Maybe in reduced form, give back some of those palaces, reform the duchy scams. As a 1/2 Brit, I do think it serves a purpose for national identity, fun etc. But William and Kate have really got to step it up if the monarchy is to survive, because the younger generation doesn't relate to the Waleses at all according to polls. You can tell the UK press is worried, too.

I don’t see William as lazy at all. Sounds like Sussex camp feeding the media

DP. You can look up the numbers yourself and see that William did substantially less work than his dad has while dealing with cancer and did less than 202 royal engagements in 2025. When you consider a countable thing is a zoom meeting with staff then that is basically nothing.

I think that you can argue that the royal work they do is basically useless and stupid but if you accept the job then it’s lazy not to do the work.

The era when engagements and ribbon cutting mattered has passed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

What makes him unkingly is his laziness. He's on another 3 1/2 week vacation as we speak, and this is his 3rd or 4th vacation this year. When he is "working," it's about once a week, and usually involves something dumb like barista cosplay, where he's rude to Kate, at some place that already has plenty of business. Also he flies celebs into his Earthshot event (btw an Epstein buddy was a major early backer), so he can do photo ops with them. And let's not start on him and Kate grabbing their 4th or 5th "forever home" last year, and kicking out a children's museum and dogwalkers.

I say all this as someone who wants the monarchy to succeed. Maybe in reduced form, give back some of those palaces, reform the duchy scams. As a 1/2 Brit, I do think it serves a purpose for national identity, fun etc. But William and Kate have really got to step it up if the monarchy is to survive, because the younger generation doesn't relate to the Waleses at all according to polls. You can tell the UK press is worried, too.

I don’t see William as lazy at all. Sounds like Sussex camp feeding the media

DP. You can look up the numbers yourself and see that William did substantially less work than his dad has while dealing with cancer and did less than 202 royal engagements in 2025. When you consider a countable thing is a zoom meeting with staff then that is basically nothing.

I think that you can argue that the royal work they do is basically useless and stupid but if you accept the job then it’s lazy not to do the work.

+1. When you’re earning £25m/year while a fifth of your country struggles with poverty (no kidding, look it up), you really need to do something. I guess constitutionally he can’t get involved with policy, so cutting ribbons it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

+100

This is how I see it too. The gossip mags may print unflattering things about stripping titles, but this just seems like more media lies.

I dunno. Tom Sykes claims to be well-connected, although as is often the case, his "sources" could just be his own whims. https://www.thedailybeast.com/prince-william-plots-bonfire-of-royal-titles-when-he-becomes-king/

I hope he strips h and m titles. They claimed they wanted out but continue to try to use it to make money.

I mean, Charles has any number of gift shops at his various residences, where he sells jam, china, dog bowls, and Burberry. The money goes into his pockets too, and not into renovations which are still picked up by British taxpayers. Zara Tindall has multiple brand deals. How is this different?

The Tindalls are private citizens...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

+100

This is how I see it too. The gossip mags may print unflattering things about stripping titles, but this just seems like more media lies.

I dunno. Tom Sykes claims to be well-connected, although as is often the case, his "sources" could just be his own whims. https://www.thedailybeast.com/prince-william-plots-bonfire-of-royal-titles-when-he-becomes-king/

I hope he strips h and m titles. They claimed they wanted out but continue to try to use it to make money.

I mean, Charles has any number of gift shops at his various residences, where he sells jam, china, dog bowls, and Burberry. The money goes into his pockets too, and not into renovations which are still picked up by British taxpayers. Zara Tindall has multiple brand deals. How is this different?

Charles and Zara both actually serve and respect the people of England.

Zara is a private citizen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

What makes him unkingly is his laziness. He's on another 3 1/2 week vacation as we speak, and this is his 3rd or 4th vacation this year. When he is "working," it's about once a week, and usually involves something dumb like barista cosplay, where he's rude to Kate, at some place that already has plenty of business. Also he flies celebs into his Earthshot event (btw an Epstein buddy was a major early backer), so he can do photo ops with them. And let's not start on him and Kate grabbing their 4th or 5th "forever home" last year, and kicking out a children's museum and dogwalkers.

I say all this as someone who wants the monarchy to succeed. Maybe in reduced form, give back some of those palaces, reform the duchy scams. As a 1/2 Brit, I do think it serves a purpose for national identity, fun etc. But William and Kate have really got to step it up if the monarchy is to survive, because the younger generation doesn't relate to the Waleses at all according to polls. You can tell the UK press is worried, too.

I don’t see William as lazy at all. Sounds like Sussex camp feeding the media

DP. You can look up the numbers yourself and see that William did substantially less work than his dad has while dealing with cancer and did less than 202 royal engagements in 2025. When you consider a countable thing is a zoom meeting with staff then that is basically nothing.

I think that you can argue that the royal work they do is basically useless and stupid but if you accept the job then it’s lazy not to do the work.

+1. When you’re earning £25m/year while a fifth of your country struggles with poverty (no kidding, look it up), you really need to do something. I guess constitutionally he can’t get involved with policy, so cutting ribbons it is.

Maybe the government can do something about it like curbing rampant immigration. King Charles is king in name only.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

What makes him unkingly is his laziness. He's on another 3 1/2 week vacation as we speak, and this is his 3rd or 4th vacation this year. When he is "working," it's about once a week, and usually involves something dumb like barista cosplay, where he's rude to Kate, at some place that already has plenty of business. Also he flies celebs into his Earthshot event (btw an Epstein buddy was a major early backer), so he can do photo ops with them. And let's not start on him and Kate grabbing their 4th or 5th "forever home" last year, and kicking out a children's museum and dogwalkers.

I say all this as someone who wants the monarchy to succeed. Maybe in reduced form, give back some of those palaces, reform the duchy scams. As a 1/2 Brit, I do think it serves a purpose for national identity, fun etc. But William and Kate have really got to step it up if the monarchy is to survive, because the younger generation doesn't relate to the Waleses at all according to polls. You can tell the UK press is worried, too.

I don’t see William as lazy at all. Sounds like Sussex camp feeding the media

DP. You can look up the numbers yourself and see that William did substantially less work than his dad has while dealing with cancer and did less than 202 royal engagements in 2025. When you consider a countable thing is a zoom meeting with staff then that is basically nothing.

I think that you can argue that the royal work they do is basically useless and stupid but if you accept the job then it’s lazy not to do the work.

+1. When you’re earning £25m/year while a fifth of your country struggles with poverty (no kidding, look it up), you really need to do something. I guess constitutionally he can’t get involved with policy, so cutting ribbons it is.

England imported a ton of poverty, culture clashes and dependency over the past decade.

That is a political issue, not a royal family issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

What makes him unkingly is his laziness. He's on another 3 1/2 week vacation as we speak, and this is his 3rd or 4th vacation this year. When he is "working," it's about once a week, and usually involves something dumb like barista cosplay, where he's rude to Kate, at some place that already has plenty of business. Also he flies celebs into his Earthshot event (btw an Epstein buddy was a major early backer), so he can do photo ops with them. And let's not start on him and Kate grabbing their 4th or 5th "forever home" last year, and kicking out a children's museum and dogwalkers.

I say all this as someone who wants the monarchy to succeed. Maybe in reduced form, give back some of those palaces, reform the duchy scams. As a 1/2 Brit, I do think it serves a purpose for national identity, fun etc. But William and Kate have really got to step it up if the monarchy is to survive, because the younger generation doesn't relate to the Waleses at all according to polls. You can tell the UK press is worried, too.

I don’t see William as lazy at all. Sounds like Sussex camp feeding the media

DP. You can look up the numbers yourself and see that William did substantially less work than his dad has while dealing with cancer and did less than 202 royal engagements in 2025. When you consider a countable thing is a zoom meeting with staff then that is basically nothing.

I think that you can argue that the royal work they do is basically useless and stupid but if you accept the job then it’s lazy not to do the work.

+1. When you’re earning £25m/year while a fifth of your country struggles with poverty (no kidding, look it up), you really need to do something. I guess constitutionally he can’t get involved with policy, so cutting ribbons it is.

Maybe the government can do something about it like curbing rampant immigration. King Charles is king in name only.

And there it is. It's often said that the Venn diagram of MAGA and royalists/Sussex haters is a circle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

What makes him unkingly is his laziness. He's on another 3 1/2 week vacation as we speak, and this is his 3rd or 4th vacation this year. When he is "working," it's about once a week, and usually involves something dumb like barista cosplay, where he's rude to Kate, at some place that already has plenty of business. Also he flies celebs into his Earthshot event (btw an Epstein buddy was a major early backer), so he can do photo ops with them. And let's not start on him and Kate grabbing their 4th or 5th "forever home" last year, and kicking out a children's museum and dogwalkers.

I say all this as someone who wants the monarchy to succeed. Maybe in reduced form, give back some of those palaces, reform the duchy scams. As a 1/2 Brit, I do think it serves a purpose for national identity, fun etc. But William and Kate have really got to step it up if the monarchy is to survive, because the younger generation doesn't relate to the Waleses at all according to polls. You can tell the UK press is worried, too.

I don’t see William as lazy at all. Sounds like Sussex camp feeding the media

DP. You can look up the numbers yourself and see that William did substantially less work than his dad has while dealing with cancer and did less than 202 royal engagements in 2025. When you consider a countable thing is a zoom meeting with staff then that is basically nothing.

I think that you can argue that the royal work they do is basically useless and stupid but if you accept the job then it’s lazy not to do the work.

+1. When you’re earning £25m/year while a fifth of your country struggles with poverty (no kidding, look it up), you really need to do something. I guess constitutionally he can’t get involved with policy, so cutting ribbons it is.

England imported a ton of poverty, culture clashes and dependency over the past decade.

That is a political issue, not a royal family issue.

Ugh, gross. Tell is without telling us that a lot of the anti-Meghan hate is race-based.

But you're not even answering the question. If anything, an increasingly brown and black population is going to relate to the monarchy even less.