Immersion school parents

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh, are we ranting about immersion in DC? Cool, here's mine:

It annoys me that immersion spots are awarded based on the lottery with no effort to show whether parents will be committed to the immersion aspect, which means that my tax dollars in DC go to provide immersion education to the kids of parents who DGAF about it and make no effort, while my kid was locked out of immersion programs due to bad lottery luck.


This is called public education. Everyone should get an equal chance. Unless it is an application school, then you don't get to rank people based on their "dedication" to the language. I pay tax dollars, too, and I am fine with everyone getting a chance to get in. You are ridiculous.


Good for you, but I think it's a waste of money to send a bunch of kids through immersion programs where they will not get the support they need to get the benefit of the program. If the minority of kids are actually learning the language, it's a poor use of public funds.

Perhaps instead of charter programs offered to a fraction of the population via lottery, which have mixed results and can even hamper learning in core subjects when kids are poorly supported at home, it would make more sense to invest in better elementary language education throughout the district.

Also, bet you anything you have a kid at an immersion school and you are "fine" with everyone getting a chance because you won the lottery and got in. Funny how that works.


You lose the bet. My kids are in immersion private school. I pay for the privilege. I still think public education should be open to all who want to apply. I still pay taxes.


Congratulations, no one cares.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh, are we ranting about immersion in DC? Cool, here's mine:

It annoys me that immersion spots are awarded based on the lottery with no effort to show whether parents will be committed to the immersion aspect, which means that my tax dollars in DC go to provide immersion education to the kids of parents who DGAF about it and make no effort, while my kid was locked out of immersion programs due to bad lottery luck.


This is called public education. Everyone should get an equal chance. Unless it is an application school, then you don't get to rank people based on their "dedication" to the language. I pay tax dollars, too, and I am fine with everyone getting a chance to get in. You are ridiculous.


+1 OP and this other poster are basically saying only kids who have parents just like me should have access to this resource. Buzz off, losers.


False. They are saying that people who don't give a flying f*** about immersion probably shouldn't be in immersion. There are lots of ways to support immersion, but doing absolutely nothing isn't one of them.

I'd support an option where parents or caregivers in immersion programs had to attend a couple programs through the year on how to support language learning at home, where families who didn't bother to show up for 3-4 hours of instruction over the course of a full year would be unenrolled. I'm sure you will scream at me that this is an unreasonable expectation, and I know it would never happen because it would be deemed inequitable, but I personally think it would be a better way to run these programs.

There are a lot of kids in immersion programs in DC who aren't learning the language AND are not getting a good basic education either (in part because they aren't learning the language). Who does that help? Why would you defend that system?


Good thing you don't get to decide how this works. You have no data to back up your assertions, either. You are just big mad that other people live their lives differently.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh, are we ranting about immersion in DC? Cool, here's mine:

It annoys me that immersion spots are awarded based on the lottery with no effort to show whether parents will be committed to the immersion aspect, which means that my tax dollars in DC go to provide immersion education to the kids of parents who DGAF about it and make no effort, while my kid was locked out of immersion programs due to bad lottery luck.


This is called public education. Everyone should get an equal chance. Unless it is an application school, then you don't get to rank people based on their "dedication" to the language. I pay tax dollars, too, and I am fine with everyone getting a chance to get in. You are ridiculous.


Good for you, but I think it's a waste of money to send a bunch of kids through immersion programs where they will not get the support they need to get the benefit of the program. If the minority of kids are actually learning the language, it's a poor use of public funds.

Perhaps instead of charter programs offered to a fraction of the population via lottery, which have mixed results and can even hamper learning in core subjects when kids are poorly supported at home, it would make more sense to invest in better elementary language education throughout the district.

Also, bet you anything you have a kid at an immersion school and you are "fine" with everyone getting a chance because you won the lottery and got in. Funny how that works.


You lose the bet. My kids are in immersion private school. I pay for the privilege. I still think public education should be open to all who want to apply. I still pay taxes.


Congratulations, no one cares.


You clearly cared enough to "bet" me on it. And to keep commenting.
Anonymous
What I think is funny is all the handwringing about immersion schools and how your child will be "fluent." hahahah. funny.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Oh, are we ranting about immersion in DC? Cool, here's mine:

It annoys me that immersion spots are awarded based on the lottery with no effort to show whether parents will be committed to the immersion aspect, which means that my tax dollars in DC go to provide immersion education to the kids of parents who DGAF about it and make no effort, while my kid was locked out of immersion programs due to bad lottery luck.


Immersion parent here: I wish you had gotten a spot. Exhausted seeing the multiple clueless parents who don’t try or push their kids to speak the target language. There is no school in dc that will teach your kids to speak another language without strong supports. And yes I constantly hear how “fluent” everyone’s kids are, and they are not. People are nice and the waiter at the Mexican restaurant/your Latinx neighbors/ the cruise director are just being polite and telling you that your kids speak great spanish. They actually are stumbling along and are somewhat comprehensible, but their grammar is atrocious and their pronunciation is not good.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Honestly, my kids go to an immersion private school and I would be doing them more harm than good trying to learn the language and use the same language at home to support them. I tried in the beginning but they are just leaps and bounds ahead of my ability to learn the it and my pronunciation and grammar are laughable compared to where they are in their ability to speak/read/write that second language. Unfortunately I missed the boat to fluently learn a second language, but my kids will be bilingual and that is what matters to me. They have plenty of ways to use and practice the language outside of school without my help.


OP here. Okay. I guess I must have different relationships with my kids. I want to know what they're learning, and they seem to have a fun time and take pride in trying to teach and correct me in my efforts. I guess I would feel pretty disappointed if (at least at this young age, preK3-2nd grade), I couldn't at least get a basic understanding of what they're learning in school. It seems a lot of parents don't really care about that.


Different strokes. Your parenting style is good for you. You don't need to criticize others' in order to feel better about yourself and your kids. Not sure why you "are struggling" to understand this. Seems like a veiled humble brag. Find something to do that can help build your inner self confidence. If that is learning a new language, so be it.


OP here. Honestly, I am more worried about the culture, like, is it worth it to be at this school. This isn't a humble brag. I'm honestly worried about the culture and fitting in.


Tell us the school.

In DCPS bilingual schools, am I wrong in thinking that half the kids are native speakers and the language is much more integrated into the school culture?


Yeah, not even close. There are a few Spanish immersion programs where that is true, but for most it's not at all true. And even at the programs where it is true, it will likely change over time (often it already has) because giving everyone equal access via the lottery means anyone can, and will, enroll. At Yu Ying and the French immersion programs, it's not at all true.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:What I think is funny is all the handwringing about immersion schools and how your child will be "fluent." hahahah. funny.


Different poster here, and yes I’m also laughing at this.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh, are we ranting about immersion in DC? Cool, here's mine:

It annoys me that immersion spots are awarded based on the lottery with no effort to show whether parents will be committed to the immersion aspect, which means that my tax dollars in DC go to provide immersion education to the kids of parents who DGAF about it and make no effort, while my kid was locked out of immersion programs due to bad lottery luck.


This is called public education. Everyone should get an equal chance. Unless it is an application school, then you don't get to rank people based on their "dedication" to the language. I pay tax dollars, too, and I am fine with everyone getting a chance to get in. You are ridiculous.


+1 OP and this other poster are basically saying only kids who have parents just like me should have access to this resource. Buzz off, losers.


False. They are saying that people who don't give a flying f*** about immersion probably shouldn't be in immersion. There are lots of ways to support immersion, but doing absolutely nothing isn't one of them.

I'd support an option where parents or caregivers in immersion programs had to attend a couple programs through the year on how to support language learning at home, where families who didn't bother to show up for 3-4 hours of instruction over the course of a full year would be unenrolled. I'm sure you will scream at me that this is an unreasonable expectation, and I know it would never happen because it would be deemed inequitable, but I personally think it would be a better way to run these programs.

There are a lot of kids in immersion programs in DC who aren't learning the language AND are not getting a good basic education either (in part because they aren't learning the language). Who does that help? Why would you defend that system?


Good thing you don't get to decide how this works. You have no data to back up your assertions, either. You are just big mad that other people live their lives differently.


For data, look at the PARCC scores at immersion programs in the city, and in particular look at the scores for at risk kids at these schools. Now consider these kids are ALSO not actually learning the immersion language either-- they are being failed twice. It's not a good situation.

Language immersion requires at home support to work. We are not serving children by offering immersion without ensuring they get the support they need for it to benefit them.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh, are we ranting about immersion in DC? Cool, here's mine:

It annoys me that immersion spots are awarded based on the lottery with no effort to show whether parents will be committed to the immersion aspect, which means that my tax dollars in DC go to provide immersion education to the kids of parents who DGAF about it and make no effort, while my kid was locked out of immersion programs due to bad lottery luck.


Immersion parent here: I wish you had gotten a spot. Exhausted seeing the multiple clueless parents who don’t try or push their kids to speak the target language. There is no school in dc that will teach your kids to speak another language without strong supports. And yes I constantly hear how “fluent” everyone’s kids are, and they are not. People are nice and the waiter at the Mexican restaurant/your Latinx neighbors/ the cruise director are just being polite and telling you that your kids speak great spanish. They actually are stumbling along and are somewhat comprehensible, but their grammar is atrocious and their pronunciation is not good.


I think people start out thinking it's going well because the novelty of a 4 or 5 year old speaking a foreign language delights them. It's not until 3rd or 4th grade where many parents realize their kid has a very rudimentary grasp on the language, and by then most of the immersion schools aren't actually doing immersion anymore anyway.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh, are we ranting about immersion in DC? Cool, here's mine:

It annoys me that immersion spots are awarded based on the lottery with no effort to show whether parents will be committed to the immersion aspect, which means that my tax dollars in DC go to provide immersion education to the kids of parents who DGAF about it and make no effort, while my kid was locked out of immersion programs due to bad lottery luck.


Immersion parent here: I wish you had gotten a spot. Exhausted seeing the multiple clueless parents who don’t try or push their kids to speak the target language. There is no school in dc that will teach your kids to speak another language without strong supports. And yes I constantly hear how “fluent” everyone’s kids are, and they are not. People are nice and the waiter at the Mexican restaurant/your Latinx neighbors/ the cruise director are just being polite and telling you that your kids speak great spanish. They actually are stumbling along and are somewhat comprehensible, but their grammar is atrocious and their pronunciation is not good.


I think people start out thinking it's going well because the novelty of a 4 or 5 year old speaking a foreign language delights them. It's not until 3rd or 4th grade where many parents realize their kid has a very rudimentary grasp on the language, and by then most of the immersion schools aren't actually doing immersion anymore anyway.


Absolutely correct. Older students at our immersion school aren’t forced to speak spanish anymore because they can’t. My mother is a spanish tutor, and in her opinion almost all the children without a spanish background speak very rudimentary spanish at best. Please understand that a spanish nanny and access to a Netflix account with spanish dubbing won’t do anything for your child.
Anonymous
I love how the people commenting have no kids at an immersion school, but they “know” everything about immersion.


I have not seen this at our school. Most families have at least one parent that understands the language. Of course I don’t know every family at the school. However there are parents that even go to Latin America for extended period of time to enroll the kids in summer programs there or par for immersion summer camps here.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh, are we ranting about immersion in DC? Cool, here's mine:

It annoys me that immersion spots are awarded based on the lottery with no effort to show whether parents will be committed to the immersion aspect, which means that my tax dollars in DC go to provide immersion education to the kids of parents who DGAF about it and make no effort, while my kid was locked out of immersion programs due to bad lottery luck.


This is called public education. Everyone should get an equal chance. Unless it is an application school, then you don't get to rank people based on their "dedication" to the language. I pay tax dollars, too, and I am fine with everyone getting a chance to get in. You are ridiculous.


+1 OP and this other poster are basically saying only kids who have parents just like me should have access to this resource. Buzz off, losers.


False. They are saying that people who don't give a flying f*** about immersion probably shouldn't be in immersion. There are lots of ways to support immersion, but doing absolutely nothing isn't one of them.

I'd support an option where parents or caregivers in immersion programs had to attend a couple programs through the year on how to support language learning at home, where families who didn't bother to show up for 3-4 hours of instruction over the course of a full year would be unenrolled. I'm sure you will scream at me that this is an unreasonable expectation, and I know it would never happen because it would be deemed inequitable, but I personally think it would be a better way to run these programs.

There are a lot of kids in immersion programs in DC who aren't learning the language AND are not getting a good basic education either (in part because they aren't learning the language). Who does that help? Why would you defend that system?


Good thing you don't get to decide how this works. You have no data to back up your assertions, either. You are just big mad that other people live their lives differently.


For data, look at the PARCC scores at immersion programs in the city, and in particular look at the scores for at risk kids at these schools. Now consider these kids are ALSO not actually learning the immersion language either-- they are being failed twice. It's not a good situation.

Language immersion requires at home support to work. We are not serving children by offering immersion without ensuring they get the support they need for it to benefit them.


This feels like an attempt to make sure the "right" parents/families are using the immersion programs, which is honestly kind of how it was 10 years ago. As a more diverse cross-section of parents access these programs, and as they are pressured to diversify their student bodies, we'll see more complaints like the folks above looking for any excuse to gatekeep their precious resources.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Honestly, my kids go to an immersion private school and I would be doing them more harm than good trying to learn the language and use the same language at home to support them. I tried in the beginning but they are just leaps and bounds ahead of my ability to learn the it and my pronunciation and grammar are laughable compared to where they are in their ability to speak/read/write that second language. Unfortunately I missed the boat to fluently learn a second language, but my kids will be bilingual and that is what matters to me. They have plenty of ways to use and practice the language outside of school without my help.


OP here. Okay. I guess I must have different relationships with my kids. I want to know what they're learning, and they seem to have a fun time and take pride in trying to teach and correct me in my efforts. I guess I would feel pretty disappointed if (at least at this young age, preK3-2nd grade), I couldn't at least get a basic understanding of what they're learning in school. It seems a lot of parents don't really care about that.


Different strokes. Your parenting style is good for you. You don't need to criticize others' in order to feel better about yourself and your kids. Not sure why you "are struggling" to understand this. Seems like a veiled humble brag. Find something to do that can help build your inner self confidence. If that is learning a new language, so be it.


OP here. Honestly, I am more worried about the culture, like, is it worth it to be at this school. This isn't a humble brag. I'm honestly worried about the culture and fitting in.


Tell us the school.

In DCPS bilingual schools, am I wrong in thinking that half the kids are native speakers and the language is much more integrated into the school culture?


Yeah, not even close. There are a few Spanish immersion programs where that is true, but for most it's not at all true. And even at the programs where it is true, it will likely change over time (often it already has) because giving everyone equal access via the lottery means anyone can, and will, enroll. At Yu Ying and the French immersion programs, it's not at all true.


There is no equal access when someone’s address determines whether they are in the school or not. These should all be DCPS citywide rather than neighborhood based. If they are based on neighborhood, at least put them in Columbia Heights or Brightwood where there are high concentrations of native speakers.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I love how the people commenting have no kids at an immersion school, but they “know” everything about immersion.


I have not seen this at our school. Most families have at least one parent that understands the language. Of course I don’t know every family at the school. However there are parents that even go to Latin America for extended period of time to enroll the kids in summer programs there or par for immersion summer camps here.


That may be your experience and there are a few immersion programs in DC like this (all of which are Spanish immersion). But it's not common. At our program it's less than half of the families we know who have a family member with any level of fluency (forget native speaker, I'm talking about reasonably conversant). At programs like Yu Ying, where we know many families, it's way less than half.

The thing is, you don't need to be fluent to support your kid in immersion. You just have to be committed. You need to be willing to reinforce at home and over the summer with books and television in the target language, maybe immersion camps or experiences, and just generally pushing your kid to keep practicing and engaging in the language. In fact, this is more important than having a parent who speaks the language if the parent does not actually speak the language WITH the child.

I'd say only about 10% of the families at our school have this level of commitment. I mean, most parents aren't that committed to anything, much less language instruction. The only thing I consistently see parents committing time and energy and sacrifice to regarding their kids is freaking soccer, for mysterious reasons.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I love how the people commenting have no kids at an immersion school, but they “know” everything about immersion.


I have not seen this at our school. Most families have at least one parent that understands the language. Of course I don’t know every family at the school. However there are parents that even go to Latin America for extended period of time to enroll the kids in summer programs there or par for immersion summer camps here.


That may be your experience and there are a few immersion programs in DC like this (all of which are Spanish immersion). But it's not common. At our program it's less than half of the families we know who have a family member with any level of fluency (forget native speaker, I'm talking about reasonably conversant). At programs like Yu Ying, where we know many families, it's way less than half.

The thing is, you don't need to be fluent to support your kid in immersion. You just have to be committed. You need to be willing to reinforce at home and over the summer with books and television in the target language, maybe immersion camps or experiences, and just generally pushing your kid to keep practicing and engaging in the language. In fact, this is more important than having a parent who speaks the language if the parent does not actually speak the language WITH the child.

I'd say only about 10% of the families at our school have this level of commitment. I mean, most parents aren't that committed to anything, much less language instruction. The only thing I consistently see parents committing time and energy and sacrifice to regarding their kids is freaking soccer, for mysterious reasons.


Way less than half? Euphemism of the thread. In fact, the number of YY AND DCI Chinese track students speaking any dialect of Chinese at home still numbers in the single digits at any given time (according to longtime YY and DCI Chinese teachers with keep in touch with). There have been multiple long threads on the subject of weak commitment to immersion in DC immersion charters in the last decade, mainly YY focused. If you do a search OP, you can learn a few things.

In a nutshell, many if not most DC charter immersion parents engage in magical thinking about kids becoming fluent in languages and the demands of the IB curriculum up the chain. The problem is endemic, and parents who point this out aren't appreciated in the school communities, other than by the like-minded. The reality is that it's very difficult for older teens to score high on IB Diploma Higher Level language exams DCI gives, even if they speak and understand languages quite well. There are some ambitious, realistic DCI feeder and DCI parents who knock themselves out, year in and year out, to ensure that kids can speak and understand immersion languages decently, but not many. We bailed on DCI for a suburban school with a test-in IBD program, after 25 years in the District, without regret. Good luck, OP.
post reply Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Message Quick Reply
Go to: