Yes that may be true, particularly post-pandemic. My kids are mid-elementary now and people were still thinking they won the lottery when they got an initial seat when MV8 opened. But I do think there are plenty of parents who still put up with lesser academics at some of the schools you listed as "getting what you hoped" because they want the security of a DCI feed. Which is now about to become a preference, so TBD on how they weigh the risk of losing the sixth grade lottery. |
If you made it to third grade at MV, then I have no doubt you plan on staying. Most families I know that left did so after a year or two as soon as they got a better lottery offer. There's a big difference between a IB Title 1 family KNOWING they'll have to leave to secure a middle school pathway, and a DCI intended family thinking they'd stay through and realizing they just couldn't. One speaks to dissatisfaction with the feeder, the other with the elementary school itself. |
What school? |
A lot of parents know how damaging poor language models are for their kids, and want to protect their kids from that. But I guess you don't really care about that. |
In her case there are issues with the school. But sure a lot of people leave due to middle school pathway. In my case we have experienced zero issues at MV8 and my kids are doing great according to their MAP results. |
The same argument OP is making could literally be applied to any subject in school and boils down to opinions about what parental support of education looks like. As your child gets older, you will likely reach a point where you can't really help them with school subjects anymore. That threshold is different for everyone, of course. In most cases, it makes no sense for the parent to learn (or relearn) subjects to support their child. I'm not going to relearn pre-calculus to help my child--I'd rather he get help and support from someone who knows a lot more than me in that subject. Isn't the same true for languages? If I don't know how to speak a language but I want my kids to learn it, me learning the language is only going to go so far to help them--and in some cases might hinder them. But whether I learn how to sing a kid's song in that language--and will actually sing it in public--doesn't mean anything about my support for my child's language learning.
-A parent with kids in a language immersion school that has learned some of the language, including the birthday song, but has never spoken or sung the language in public |
+2 |
my spanish is pretty good, generally, but let me think, "Estas son las mananitas que cantaba el rey david, hoy por ser el dia de tu santo te las cantamos a ti. Despierta, mi bien, despierta, mira que amanecio, que ya los pajaritos cantan la luna ya se metio....."
I've probably got some mistakes in there, didn't do the accents, and don't know any more verses, but hey!!!! Not everybody who's OK with a language has the birthday song down perfect... |
I don't have a problem with someone who doesn't speak a language enrolling their kid in language immersion, but disagree that language immersion is no different than a parent not wanting to learn "new math" for 4th graders or not learning enough physics to tutor their high school student. Language immersion IS different, especially when we're talking about immersion at the ECE level, which is when most of these schools are actually doing true immersion. |
No 7 year old is fluent, in any language. They do not having the vocabulary, reading or writing ability to be fluent. If someone came to me and claimed to be “fluent” in English because they can read Magic Treehouse, I would not take that person seriously but also not argue with them because what’s the point? The kid is going a great job… but not fluent. |
Ok, so how is it different? How is a parent who doesn’t speak the language going to help their child? |
Sounds like your neighbor is focused on providing the best education for her child. Changing schools in mid-elementary because your current school is not serving your child is not the self-own you seem to think it is. Maybe they were unlucky in the lottery in earlier grades. Maybe their school was good in lower grades but they watched as other invested families bailed by 3rd and chose to not be left behind. Maybe moving schools got them a preferable MS/HS feed. And if you are staying at MV8 for DCI, I get it, but that does not magically make it a great school. I'm betting it was not your first choice and you are making it work with what you were able to get in the lottery. Join the club. |
People have mentioned numerous ways in this thread: providing media in the target language, gaining enough familiarity to support their kid's immersion (not becoming fluent but making some effort to learn the basics so they can engage with their kid regarding the language), hiring sitters/nannies who speak the language, pursuing experiences in the target language (from travel to music classes and everything in between), etc. A lot of parents with kids in early years immersion (and many with kids in later years immersion) do some or all of the above. Meanwhile, almost no one is doing this much to support their kid's in HS-level science or math classes. So yes, immersion is different. |
I just held a first grade birthday party this weekend. Now I have to figure out which person I need to unvite next year! Dum dum dum... |
I saw a DCB birthday party, was that yours? |