'CPAC founder grovels amid groping claims'

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's weird and inappropriate that OP and others are mocking the fact this happened between two men. We are past that era where that should induce any shame, for one. And more importantly, making light of what sounds like an allegedly horrible assault is just gross.

I'm not sure about the others but the OP doesn't seem to be making light of the situation at all.

There's nothing wrong with men attracted to other men. He sexually assaulted other men. That's very wrong. He's so filled with repression and shame about his closeted homosexuality that his outlet for it is to use his position of power to grope people and get away with it. That's also very wrong. It's abuse of power in addition to sexual assault and sexual harassment in the workplace.

He's trying to salvage his career instead of just coming out of the closet. He's trying to promise he's really just a straight man. Ah yes, that straight urge to touch other men. Republicans that push gay people to pretend they're straight are the worst. No one is going to believe he's straight at this point.

I'm not sure his sexuality is the most important issue. If the allegations are true, he violently assaulted someone. I didnt know Schlapp's name prior to this or why you think he is especially homophobic, but I dont think you are the victim here.

So people do sexually assault others even when they aren't ashamed of their sexuality but in this case, I'd wager that his repression is what leads to this behavior. If he could just go out to a gay bar and pick someone up, he wouldn't have done this.

So it's not so much the sexuality that's the important issue, obviously that's the assault but this assault was propelled by his shame and repression combined with a propensity to grope people.

I am not going to psychoanalyze someone I dont know anything about. But the mocking tones in the posts here about homosexuality are hardly in the spirit of acceptance.

Also, a large body of research shows that sexual offenders get off on humiliating people by assaulting or harrassing them. So whether he is gay, straight, bi, or kink in his normal sex life is not the REASON he would choose to assault someone.

The allegation is that he "pummelled" the victim in the groin. Could he have gotten satisfaction from being a dom to a sub man? Possibly. But that isnt what he chose to do, allegedly. This issue here is about consent and violence. Not "tee hee" over whether he is a closeted gay. People are allowed to be closeted, they dont owe you insight into their sexual desires. Unless you can link evidence that he personally and directly attempted to overturn gay rights, I dont see how giggling about people being gay is okay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's weird and inappropriate that OP and others are mocking the fact this happened between two men. We are past that era where that should induce any shame, for one. And more importantly, making light of what sounds like an allegedly horrible assault is just gross.

I'm not sure about the others but the OP doesn't seem to be making light of the situation at all.

There's nothing wrong with men attracted to other men. He sexually assaulted other men. That's very wrong. He's so filled with repression and shame about his closeted homosexuality that his outlet for it is to use his position of power to grope people and get away with it. That's also very wrong. It's abuse of power in addition to sexual assault and sexual harassment in the workplace.

He's trying to salvage his career instead of just coming out of the closet. He's trying to promise he's really just a straight man. Ah yes, that straight urge to touch other men. Republicans that push gay people to pretend they're straight are the worst. No one is going to believe he's straight at this point.

I'm not sure his sexuality is the most important issue. If the allegations are true, he violently assaulted someone. I didnt know Schlapp's name prior to this or why you think he is especially homophobic, but I dont think you are the victim here.

So people do sexually assault others even when they aren't ashamed of their sexuality but in this case, I'd wager that his repression is what leads to this behavior. If he could just go out to a gay bar and pick someone up, he wouldn't have done this.

So it's not so much the sexuality that's the important issue, obviously that's the assault but this assault was propelled by his shame and repression combined with a propensity to grope people.

I am not going to psychoanalyze someone I dont know anything about. But the mocking tones in the posts here about homosexuality are hardly in the spirit of acceptance.

Also, a large body of research shows that sexual offenders get off on humiliating people by assaulting or harrassing them. So whether he is gay, straight, bi, or kink in his normal sex life is not the REASON he would choose to assault someone.

The allegation is that he "pummelled" the victim in the groin. Could he have gotten satisfaction from being a dom to a sub man? Possibly. But that isnt what he chose to do, allegedly. This issue here is about consent and violence. Not "tee hee" over whether he is a closeted gay. People are allowed to be closeted, they dont owe you insight into their sexual desires. Unless you can link evidence that he personally and directly attempted to overturn gay rights, I dont see how giggling about people being gay is okay.

Are you implying I'm giggling about him being gay? I'm giving you my beliefs on his situation. Take it or leave it. There's no giggling on my part. I've had plenty of people IN REAL LIFE giggle at me. I don't do that. You don't know me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This situation, below, is so unfair. The CPAC event is floundering, and Fox News may not even cover it, just because CPAC honcho Matt Schlapp “sexually fondled” another man.

What hypocrites! Matt has promised he won’t do it again. Doesn’t he deserve a second chance?

#RedemptionForMatt


https://www.rawstory.com/matt-schlapp-cpac-groping/

CPAC founder grovels amid groping claims: 'Kevin McCarthy is not coming to CPAC; I wish he would'

"Kevin McCarthy is not coming to CPAC; I wish he would," Schlapp said.

"[I]t remains to be seen if and how Fox News will cover the annual right-wing confab amid CPAC boss Matt Schlapp's alleged groping scandal," the report said.

McCarthy is too scared to attend.

Scared of what? There are no non-insane people speaking. It’s like Bolsonaro and Mike Lindell.

He will have to face the the people. He wont’ do that

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really is unfortunate to see CPAC suffering simply because Matt Schlapp tried to hook up with another man, or sexually fondled him, or whatever the term is. Can't people look past one lust-driven mistake?

The allegation is assault, not an indiscretion.

Allegations like this go waaay back. It’s a Democrat staple

The accuser worked for Herschel Walker’s campaign.

Makes no difference

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really is unfortunate to see CPAC suffering simply because Matt Schlapp tried to hook up with another man, or sexually fondled him, or whatever the term is. Can't people look past one lust-driven mistake?

The allegation is assault, not an indiscretion.

Allegations like this go waaay back. It’s a Democrat staple

The accuser worked for Herschel Walker’s campaign.

Makes no difference

This allegation is not a “Democrat staple” if it’s from someone on staff at a Republican’s campaign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's weird and inappropriate that OP and others are mocking the fact this happened between two men. We are past that era where that should induce any shame, for one. And more importantly, making light of what sounds like an allegedly horrible assault is just gross.

I'm not sure about the others but the OP doesn't seem to be making light of the situation at all.

There's nothing wrong with men attracted to other men. He sexually assaulted other men. That's very wrong. He's so filled with repression and shame about his closeted homosexuality that his outlet for it is to use his position of power to grope people and get away with it. That's also very wrong. It's abuse of power in addition to sexual assault and sexual harassment in the workplace.

He's trying to salvage his career instead of just coming out of the closet. He's trying to promise he's really just a straight man. Ah yes, that straight urge to touch other men. Republicans that push gay people to pretend they're straight are the worst. No one is going to believe he's straight at this point.

I'm not sure his sexuality is the most important issue. If the allegations are true, he violently assaulted someone. I didnt know Schlapp's name prior to this or why you think he is especially homophobic, but I dont think you are the victim here.

So people do sexually assault others even when they aren't ashamed of their sexuality but in this case, I'd wager that his repression is what leads to this behavior. If he could just go out to a gay bar and pick someone up, he wouldn't have done this.

So it's not so much the sexuality that's the important issue, obviously that's the assault but this assault was propelled by his shame and repression combined with a propensity to grope people.

I am not going to psychoanalyze someone I dont know anything about. But the mocking tones in the posts here about homosexuality are hardly in the spirit of acceptance.

Also, a large body of research shows that sexual offenders get off on humiliating people by assaulting or harrassing them. So whether he is gay, straight, bi, or kink in his normal sex life is not the REASON he would choose to assault someone.

The allegation is that he "pummelled" the victim in the groin. Could he have gotten satisfaction from being a dom to a sub man? Possibly. But that isnt what he chose to do, allegedly. This issue here is about consent and violence. Not "tee hee" over whether he is a closeted gay. People are allowed to be closeted, they dont owe you insight into their sexual desires. Unless you can link evidence that he personally and directly attempted to overturn gay rights, I dont see how giggling about people being gay is okay.

I don’t think there’s giggling about people being gay here. I think there’s giggling that there are finally at least some consequences from Republicans to deplorable behavior by a Republican, in that some of them are avoiding Schlapp’s conference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really is unfortunate to see CPAC suffering simply because Matt Schlapp tried to hook up with another man, or sexually fondled him, or whatever the term is. Can't people look past one lust-driven mistake?

The allegation is assault, not an indiscretion.

Allegations like this go waaay back. It’s a Democrat staple

The accuser worked for Herschel Walker’s campaign.

Makes no difference

This allegation is not a “Democrat staple” if it’s from someone on staff at a Republican’s campaign.

Seems being a "closeted homosexual" is a Republican staple. Not that there's anything wrong with that. MAGA!

[Anonymous]

My granddaddy, a proud Kentucky gentlemen, slow to speak but forthright when he did, had a saying he was especially find of. On summer nights, you might hear it a couple of times.

"Young fella," he'd say, "If your name even turns up in a newspaper headline near to the phrase 'His Genitals', why, son, you're plum outta luck..."

I miss the old guy.


Political Aide Files Lawsuit Accusing Matt Schlapp of ‘Aggressively Fondling’ His Genitals

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/ex-political-aide-files-lawsuit-accusing-matt-schlapp-of-aggressively-fondling-his-genitals-and-then-defaming-him/

“Schlapp then moved his hand and “began aggressively fondling Mr. Doe’s genital area in a sustained fashion.

“Mr. Schlapp’s aggressive fondling of Mr. Doe’s genital area in a sustained fashion proceeded from lust.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My granddaddy, a proud Kentucky gentlemen, slow to speak but forthright when he did, had a saying he was especially find of. On summer nights, you might hear it a couple of times.

"Young fella," he'd say, "If your name even turns up in a newspaper headline near to the phrase 'His Genitals', why, son, you're plum outta luck..."

I miss the old guy.


Political Aide Files Lawsuit Accusing Matt Schlapp of ‘Aggressively Fondling’ His Genitals

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/ex-political-aide-files-lawsuit-accusing-matt-schlapp-of-aggressively-fondling-his-genitals-and-then-defaming-him/

“Schlapp then moved his hand and “began aggressively fondling Mr. Doe’s genital area in a sustained fashion.

“Mr. Schlapp’s aggressive fondling of Mr. Doe’s genital area in a sustained fashion proceeded from lust.”

The best part is that Shlapp texted the victim later in the evening and requested his presence in Schlapp's hotel room. People are laughing about what a hypocrite he is. He cancelled the Log Cabin Republicans from CPAC last year and is constantly proselytizing about the sanctity of marriage. Maybe he should have become a priest.

[Anonymous]

CPAC: The Conference for Gropers and Groypers

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's weird and inappropriate that OP and others are mocking the fact this happened between two men. We are past that era where that should induce any shame, for one. And more importantly, making light of what sounds like an allegedly horrible assault is just gross.

I'm not sure about the others but the OP doesn't seem to be making light of the situation at all.

There's nothing wrong with men attracted to other men. He sexually assaulted other men. That's very wrong. He's so filled with repression and shame about his closeted homosexuality that his outlet for it is to use his position of power to grope people and get away with it. That's also very wrong. It's abuse of power in addition to sexual assault and sexual harassment in the workplace.

He's trying to salvage his career instead of just coming out of the closet. He's trying to promise he's really just a straight man. Ah yes, that straight urge to touch other men. Republicans that push gay people to pretend they're straight are the worst. No one is going to believe he's straight at this point.

I'm not sure his sexuality is the most important issue. If the allegations are true, he violently assaulted someone. I didnt know Schlapp's name prior to this or why you think he is especially homophobic, but I dont think you are the victim here.

So people do sexually assault others even when they aren't ashamed of their sexuality but in this case, I'd wager that his repression is what leads to this behavior. If he could just go out to a gay bar and pick someone up, he wouldn't have done this.

So it's not so much the sexuality that's the important issue, obviously that's the assault but this assault was propelled by his shame and repression combined with a propensity to grope people.

I am not going to psychoanalyze someone I dont know anything about. But the mocking tones in the posts here about homosexuality are hardly in the spirit of acceptance.

Also, a large body of research shows that sexual offenders get off on humiliating people by assaulting or harrassing them. So whether he is gay, straight, bi, or kink in his normal sex life is not the REASON he would choose to assault someone.

The allegation is that he "pummelled" the victim in the groin. Could he have gotten satisfaction from being a dom to a sub man? Possibly. But that isnt what he chose to do, allegedly. This issue here is about consent and violence. Not "tee hee" over whether he is a closeted gay. People are allowed to be closeted, they dont owe you insight into their sexual desires. Unless you can link evidence that he personally and directly attempted to overturn gay rights, I dont see how giggling about people being gay is okay.

I don’t think there’s giggling about people being gay here. I think there’s giggling that there are finally at least some consequences from Republicans to deplorable behavior by a Republican, in that some of them are avoiding Schlapp’s conference.

Schlapp is NOT being attacked for homosexuality. He is being attacked for his deep, vicious hypocrisy, given he has enabled and promoted anti-gay behavior and legislation, he is being questioned for his psychotic behavior in trying to demonize and marginalize others for behavior that he himself engages in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It really is unfortunate to see CPAC suffering simply because Matt Schlapp tried to hook up with another man, or sexually fondled him, or whatever the term is. Can't people look past one lust-driven mistake?

What?
The Republican party is 1000% full of pedos.

He doesn't get a pass it was not the first time.

The lawsuit against him is dam good. He will lose. Not sure about jail but he will lose he is a disgusting POS and you want people to ignore someone who was hurt?

CPAC is NAZIVILLE, Pedo Country,

[Anonymous]

Matty & Mercedes are garbage utter crap.

Matty did this he is gross.

Who stands with CPAC? They literally had Russian flags flying last time and are NAZIs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's weird and inappropriate that OP and others are mocking the fact this happened between two men. We are past that era where that should induce any shame, for one. And more importantly, making light of what sounds like an allegedly horrible assault is just gross.

I'm not sure about the others but the OP doesn't seem to be making light of the situation at all.

There's nothing wrong with men attracted to other men. He sexually assaulted other men. That's very wrong. He's so filled with repression and shame about his closeted homosexuality that his outlet for it is to use his position of power to grope people and get away with it. That's also very wrong. It's abuse of power in addition to sexual assault and sexual harassment in the workplace.

He's trying to salvage his career instead of just coming out of the closet. He's trying to promise he's really just a straight man. Ah yes, that straight urge to touch other men. Republicans that push gay people to pretend they're straight are the worst. No one is going to believe he's straight at this point.

I'm not sure his sexuality is the most important issue. If the allegations are true, he violently assaulted someone. I didnt know Schlapp's name prior to this or why you think he is especially homophobic, but I dont think you are the victim here.

So people do sexually assault others even when they aren't ashamed of their sexuality but in this case, I'd wager that his repression is what leads to this behavior. If he could just go out to a gay bar and pick someone up, he wouldn't have done this.

So it's not so much the sexuality that's the important issue, obviously that's the assault but this assault was propelled by his shame and repression combined with a propensity to grope people.

I am not going to psychoanalyze someone I dont know anything about. But the mocking tones in the posts here about homosexuality are hardly in the spirit of acceptance.

Also, a large body of research shows that sexual offenders get off on humiliating people by assaulting or harrassing them. So whether he is gay, straight, bi, or kink in his normal sex life is not the REASON he would choose to assault someone.

The allegation is that he "pummelled" the victim in the groin. Could he have gotten satisfaction from being a dom to a sub man? Possibly. But that isnt what he chose to do, allegedly. This issue here is about consent and violence. Not "tee hee" over whether he is a closeted gay. People are allowed to be closeted, they dont owe you insight into their sexual desires. Unless you can link evidence that he personally and directly attempted to overturn gay rights, I dont see how giggling about people being gay is okay.

I don’t think there’s giggling about people being gay here. I think there’s giggling that there are finally at least some consequences from Republicans to deplorable behavior by a Republican, in that some of them are avoiding Schlapp’s conference.

Schlapp is NOT being attacked for homosexuality. He is being attacked for his deep, vicious hypocrisy, given he has enabled and promoted anti-gay behavior and legislation, he is being questioned for his psychotic behavior in trying to demonize and marginalize others for behavior that he himself engages in.

How does Josh Hawley figure into all of this? Wonder if there's an opportunity for him to chauffeur Matt Schlapp now and again?

https://www.queerty.com/josh-hawley-cant-remember-poster-half-naked-man-hanging-bed-college-20210309

[Anonymous]

#DontSchlappMeBro


GOP operative comes forward as accuser in sexual misconduct claim against CPAC head Matt Schlapp

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/gop-operative-comes-forward-as-accuser-in-sexual-misconduct-claim-against-cpac-head/ar-AA18npXS

At the bar, Huffman alleged, Schlapp’s leg made what felt like intentional contact with his own.

A few minutes into the drive back to his hotel, Schlapp rested his hand on Huffman’s leg, Huffman said.

Huffman’s mind raced as Schlapp’s hand remained on his thigh for most of the ride to his hotel.

Before getting out of the car, Schlapp rubbed Huffman’s genitals, Huffman said. Then he invited Huffman to his hotel room.