'CPAC founder grovels amid groping claims'

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course there are more incidents

To be honest? I don't trust this stuff anymore. Too many times it turns out to be a false hit list, so to speak.

Also, it is possible these men, maybe without meaning to, put out "signals" in a way where Matt thought they were interested in having a sexual encounter.
So when Matt kissed, groped and/or fondled them, he thought he was responding to mutual interest.

Is Matt married to a woman?

Yes. Mercedes Schlapp!

[Anonymous]

I always think of him as "Dick Schlapp" when I hear his name.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course there are more incidents

To be honest? I don't trust this stuff anymore. Too many times it turns out to be a false hit list, so to speak.

Also, it is possible these men, maybe without meaning to, put out "signals" in a way where Matt thought they were interested in having a sexual encounter.
So when Matt kissed, groped and/or fondled them, he thought he was responding to mutual interest.

So, you're really taking Schlapp's side on this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course there are more incidents

To be honest? I don't trust this stuff anymore. Too many times it turns out to be a false hit list, so to speak.

Also, it is possible these men, maybe without meaning to, put out "signals" in a way where Matt thought they were interested in having a sexual encounter.
So when Matt kissed, groped and/or fondled them, he thought he was responding to mutual interest.

So, you're really taking Schlapp's side on this?

NP. Look at the wording here:

The vice chairman of the board of the American Conservative Union, Charlie Gerow, announced his resignation on Friday in a letter to other directors that called on them to authorize an investigation including any additional allegations that they or staff have become aware of, according to multiple people familiar with the letter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation.

Wording like that? Nope.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course there are more incidents

To be honest? I don't trust this stuff anymore. Too many times it turns out to be a false hit list, so to speak.

Also, it is possible these men, maybe without meaning to, put out "signals" in a way where Matt thought they were interested in having a sexual encounter.
So when Matt kissed, groped and/or fondled them, he thought he was responding to mutual interest.

Sorry but if you're somebody's boss, you need more than "signals" before you grope them, three beers in. Either they make a move on you, or you have a conversation before anything happens. Jeez...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course there are more incidents

To be honest? I don't trust this stuff anymore. Too many times it turns out to be a false hit list, so to speak.

Also, it is possible these men, maybe without meaning to, put out "signals" in a way where Matt thought they were interested in having a sexual encounter.
So when Matt kissed, groped and/or fondled them, he thought he was responding to mutual interest.

Is Matt married to a woman?

Yes. Mercedes Schlapp!

Mercy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course there are more incidents

To be honest? I don't trust this stuff anymore. Too many times it turns out to be a false hit list, so to speak.

Also, it is possible these men, maybe without meaning to, put out "signals" in a way where Matt thought they were interested in having a sexual encounter.
So when Matt kissed, groped and/or fondled them, he thought he was responding to mutual interest.

Perhaps the skirts these men were wearing were too short.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course there are more incidents

To be honest? I don't trust this stuff anymore. Too many times it turns out to be a false hit list, so to speak.

Also, it is possible these men, maybe without meaning to, put out "signals" in a way where Matt thought they were interested in having a sexual encounter.
So when Matt kissed, groped and/or fondled them, he thought he was responding to mutual interest.

Is Matt married to a woman?

Yes. Mercedes Schlapp!

When you have Mercedes Schlapp, you get its valves adjusted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course there are more incidents

To be honest? I don't trust this stuff anymore. Too many times it turns out to be a false hit list, so to speak.

Also, it is possible these men, maybe without meaning to, put out "signals" in a way where Matt thought they were interested in having a sexual encounter.
So when Matt kissed, groped and/or fondled them, he thought he was responding to mutual interest.

Perhaps the skirts these men were wearing were too short.

Yes, or their blouse was cut too low. It could have happened that way.
Just asking questions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Their followers are no brighter. Anyone remember this?



And sorry Matt, but you have to get consent. Especially from employees.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Their followers are no brighter. Anyone remember this?



And sorry Matt, but you have to get consent. Especially from employees.

That little hussy with the flags was asking for a grope to be made!

[Anonymous]

Please stop mocking Matt Schlapp. His lust for Male Flesh simply got the better of him. He is a Christian man and a Conservative Patriot.

Redemption can be his, if liberals will only grant it to him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Please stop mocking Matt Schlapp. His lust for Male Flesh simply got the better of him. He is a Christian man and a Conservative Patriot.

Redemption can be his, if liberals will only grant it to him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please stop mocking Matt Schlapp. His lust for Male Flesh simply got the better of him. He is a Christian man and a Conservative Patriot.

Redemption can be his, if liberals will only grant it to him.

That’s pretty much the way of it if you’re GOP. Spend a lifetime denigrating Group A, slip up and show you’re part of Group A, gnash your teeth and cry and everyone forgets about it. Convenient!