AZ now bans abortion based on dormant 160-year old law

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Come on. Clearly this is what Republicans and AZ residents want. Where are the defenders of this law? I’d love to hear from them.

It’ll take a few hours for the trolls to find out their talking points.

But probably along the lines of “killing babies is disgusting/shameful/immoral”

What else can they say? Clearly it’s not in the best interests of women or society.

I think they’ll go with the “babies feel pain at 15 weeks” so we have to repeal AZ current law, which allows up to 15 weeks.

I can’t believe this is even happening at this point. Did they not just see Alabama flip a seat? How are these people so politically out of touch? Because they aren’t doing this on legal or moral grounds.

You know what is also painful? Giving birth. If "feels pain" is the standard that works both ways.

Stubbing your toe can also be painful, but probably not as painful as getting your toe pulled of your foot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

The commercials write themselves

Vote blue vote blue vote blue or we will find ourselves officially in the Handmaid’s Tale.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

The commercials write themselves

Wait, all our resident GOP trolls told us that most republicans don't support this law. Yet republicans refused (again) to repeal the law when it came up for a vote. I'm beginning to think that most republicans do in fact support this law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The commercials write themselves

Wait, all our resident GOP trolls told us that most republicans don't support this law. Yet republicans refused (again) to repeal the law when it came up for a vote. I'm beginning to think that most republicans do in fact support this law.

I too am beginning to think this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The commercials write themselves

Vote blue vote blue vote blue or we will find ourselves officially in the Handmaid’s Tale.

Wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Forced birthers are happily showing everyone how disposable they find inalienable rights.

"The Supreme Court, in its ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, overruled Roe v. Wade and nearly 50 years of constitutional precedent and held that there is no constitutional right to abortion." So the right to LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness trumps your request.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Vote blue vote blue vote blue or we will find ourselves officially in the Handmaid’s Tale.

Wrong.

Alas, you are correct. We are already more there than we'd like to admit to ourselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Forced birthers are happily showing everyone how disposable they find inalienable rights.

"The Supreme Court, in its ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, overruled Roe v. Wade and nearly 50 years of constitutional precedent and held that there is no constitutional right to abortion." So the right to LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness trumps your request.

Forced birthers have shown just how disposable life is to them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Forced birthers are happily showing everyone how disposable they find inalienable rights.

"The Supreme Court, in its ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, overruled Roe v. Wade and nearly 50 years of constitutional precedent and held that there is no constitutional right to abortion." So the right to LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness trumps your request.

Does the life of the mother count at all?
How close to death must she be before you think abortion is acceptable? What is your threshold for fever, blood loss, stage of cancer diagnosis where it suddenly becomes ok to abort?
Have you seriously never known anyone in your life who has suffered an ectopic, a missed miscarriage, PPROM before viability, placental abruption, fatal fetal diagnosis, etc?
Are you comfortable with saying that child victims of rape should be forced to carry pregnancies to term? You realize there's no exception in this AZ law for that, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Forced birthers are happily showing everyone how disposable they find inalienable rights.

"The Supreme Court, in its ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, overruled Roe v. Wade and nearly 50 years of constitutional precedent and held that there is no constitutional right to abortion." So the right to LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness trumps your request.

Please. Slavery was so called legal at one point as well and that was wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Forced birthers are happily showing everyone how disposable they find inalienable rights.

"The Supreme Court, in its ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, overruled Roe v. Wade and nearly 50 years of constitutional precedent and held that there is no constitutional right to abortion." So the right to LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness trumps your request.

Does the life of the mother count at all?
How close to death must she be before you think abortion is acceptable? What is your threshold for fever, blood loss, stage of cancer diagnosis where it suddenly becomes ok to abort?
Have you seriously never known anyone in your life who has suffered an ectopic, a missed miscarriage, PPROM before viability, placental abruption, fatal fetal diagnosis, etc?
Are you comfortable with saying that child victims of rape should be forced to carry pregnancies to term? You realize there's no exception in this AZ law for that, right?

They seem to be comfortable with women dying and with 12 year olds giving birth to a rapist's baby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Forced birthers are happily showing everyone how disposable they find inalienable rights.

"The Supreme Court, in its ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, overruled Roe v. Wade and nearly 50 years of constitutional precedent and held that there is no constitutional right to abortion." So the right to LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness trumps your request.

Why do you people quote the Declaration of Independence and pretend it’s the Constitution?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Forced birthers are happily showing everyone how disposable they find inalienable rights.

"The Supreme Court, in its ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, overruled Roe v. Wade and nearly 50 years of constitutional precedent and held that there is no constitutional right to abortion." So the right to LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness trumps your request.

Does the life of the mother count at all?
How close to death must she be before you think abortion is acceptable? What is your threshold for fever, blood loss, stage of cancer diagnosis where it suddenly becomes ok to abort?
Have you seriously never known anyone in your life who has suffered an ectopic, a missed miscarriage, PPROM before viability, placental abruption, fatal fetal diagnosis, etc?
Are you comfortable with saying that child victims of rape should be forced to carry pregnancies to term? You realize there's no exception in this AZ law for that, right?

They seem to be comfortable with women dying and with 12 year olds giving birth to a rapist's baby.

It’s clear to me that all of these forced birthers think a woman’s life is not that important and that she can’t think on her own….you know, how it was back in 19th century.

As a woman, why should I accept that kind of thinking? What don’t they get?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Forced birthers are happily showing everyone how disposable they find inalienable rights.

"The Supreme Court, in its ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, overruled Roe v. Wade and nearly 50 years of constitutional precedent and held that there is no constitutional right to abortion." So the right to LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness trumps your request.

Does the life of the mother count at all?
How close to death must she be before you think abortion is acceptable? What is your threshold for fever, blood loss, stage of cancer diagnosis where it suddenly becomes ok to abort?
Have you seriously never known anyone in your life who has suffered an ectopic, a missed miscarriage, PPROM before viability, placental abruption, fatal fetal diagnosis, etc?
Are you comfortable with saying that child victims of rape should be forced to carry pregnancies to term? You realize there's no exception in this AZ law for that, right?

They seem to be comfortable with women dying and with 12 year olds giving birth to a rapist's baby.

It’s clear to me that all of these forced birthers think a woman’s life is not that important and that she can’t think on her own….you know, how it was back in 19th century.

As a woman, why should I accept that kind of thinking? What don’t they get?

You shouldn’t. But so many do. It’s insane —over 50% of white women voted for a Trump. Over 50% of Catholics voted for a man who makes fun of the disabled and pilloried refugees and the poor. 43% of families with a union member in house voted for a man that wants to destroy unions and workers’ rights. A large number of people just don’t vote in their self-interest. Obviously some have conflicting interests—some of those white women were choosing tax cuts over bodily autonomy. But most had no rational self-interested reason to vote that way. That’s what so aggravating — many people would apparently rather vote in spite for others rather than their own self interest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Forced birthers are happily showing everyone how disposable they find inalienable rights.

"The Supreme Court, in its ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, overruled Roe v. Wade and nearly 50 years of constitutional precedent and held that there is no constitutional right to abortion." So the right to LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness trumps your request.

Does the life of the mother count at all?
How close to death must she be before you think abortion is acceptable? What is your threshold for fever, blood loss, stage of cancer diagnosis where it suddenly becomes ok to abort?
Have you seriously never known anyone in your life who has suffered an ectopic, a missed miscarriage, PPROM before viability, placental abruption, fatal fetal diagnosis, etc?
Are you comfortable with saying that child victims of rape should be forced to carry pregnancies to term? You realize there's no exception in this AZ law for that, right?

They seem to be comfortable with women dying and with 12 year olds giving birth to a rapist's baby.

It’s clear to me that all of these forced birthers think a woman’s life is not that important and that she can’t think on her own….you know, how it was back in 19th century.

As a woman, why should I accept that kind of thinking? What don’t they get?

To many conservatives voting for this, control and spite are worth more to them than their own rights. Many also believe God will protect them but won't protect "the wicked." They have to find out the hard way yet again.