RFK Jr. Running as independent

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is so unserious.

Wait till you hear about his running mate.

Oh my God. This is amazing.

Well she is very pretty

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is so unserious.

Wait till you hear about his running mate.

Oh my God. This is amazing.

Right? I had a lot of fun in college and am very far from a prude, but seriously? Gross.

[Anonymous]

I heard on the radio tonight her introduction by RFK Jr at the rally in Oakland, and then when she started talking. she said that Americans are hurting due to chronic diseases and that she will put an end to chronic diseases once she is VP by gathering AI and the best scientists, they will look into the databases (i am not sure what she was referring to) and they will solve the chronic diseases in weeks!! in weeks!!. she also added making America healthy again.

I mean, how stupid do you need to be to believe this stuff. that she can gather "the best scientists" and cure all chronic diseases affecting Americans? is she Trump on steroid?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I heard on the radio tonight her introduction by RFK Jr at the rally in Oakland, and then when she started talking. she said that Americans are hurting due to chronic diseases and that she will put an end to chronic diseases once she is VP by gathering AI and the best scientists, they will look into the databases (i am not sure what she was referring to) and they will solve the chronic diseases in weeks!! in weeks!!. she also added making America healthy again.

I mean, how stupid do you need to be to believe this stuff. that she can gather "the best scientists" and cure all chronic diseases affecting Americans? is she Trump on steroid?

Weird that someone who cares about health would be hanging around with a dangerous and deranged anti-vaxxer like RFK Jr. who like so many others are running around promoting fear of getting the vaccines "because of myocarditis" when the fact is you're far more likely to get myocarditis from covid itself.

"Why won't anyone debate RFK Jr?" - well I'm sure a lot of people would happily debate him on it, for example here Joe Rogan gets smacked down for that same line.
https://www.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/1bnt00l/joe_gets_factchecked_by_josh_szeps/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This VP pick ought to end the footsie game that some conservatives have been playing with RFK Jr. Just another leftist nutcase after all.

That’s your hope anyway, that RFK, Nutbjob doesn’t peel off Trump votes, but he’s running as a spoiler at the behest of Republicans. He’s yours. You can have him.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Nothing says "DEMOCRACY" like working to block ballot access for anyone who is deemed a threat to Biden.........

In the past week the Democratic Party and other outside groups have put together a team to oppose third-party and independent candidates, a sign that Democrats are ready to fight back against candidacies they perceive as spoiler threats, like Kennedy.

The effort is staffed by longtime operatives like communications consultant Lis Smith, who helped guide Pete Buttigieg’s 2020 presidential campaign, and Dana Remus, who until recently served as Biden’s White House counsel, underscoring the seriousness of the concern.

The Democratic National Committee calls Kennedy a “stalking horse” who will increase Trump’s chances of winning in November. They point to significant contributions from Timothy Mellon, a Trump mega donor, to American Values 2024, and to lingering concerns that in 2016 third-party candidates may have tipped the presidency to Trump.

While Democratic attention was initially directed toward the wide array of third-party contenders, such as independent Cornel West and the No Labels coalition, Kennedy has become the focus of more energy as of late.

https://www.politico.com/newsletters/politico-nightly/2024/03/21/rfk-jr-and-the-ballot-access-wars-00148478

[Anonymous]

And running spoilers to try to throw the election to a candidate that can not win on his own?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And running spoilers to try to throw the election to a candidate that can not win on his own?

Who are you to decide who *can* and *cannot* win on his own?
Who are you to dictate how others should vote?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And running spoilers to try to throw the election to a candidate that can not win on his own?

Who are you to decide who *can* and *cannot* win on his own?
Who are you to dictate how others should vote?

I am not an idiot. Fighting back against a spoiler is fair game.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And running spoilers to try to throw the election to a candidate that can not win on his own?

Who are you to decide who *can* and *cannot* win on his own?
Who are you to dictate how others should vote?

I am not an idiot. Fighting back against a spoiler is fair game.

Fine. Fight against a candidate based on policy.
Fighting to prevent *anyone* from appearing on the ballot is one of the most unDemocratic things you can do.
But, what do you expect from the party who falsely screams "Threat to Democracy!" every chance they get?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And running spoilers to try to throw the election to a candidate that can not win on his own?

Who are you to decide who *can* and *cannot* win on his own?
Who are you to dictate how others should vote?

I am not an idiot. Fighting back against a spoiler is fair game.

Fine. Fight against a candidate based on policy.
Fighting to prevent *anyone* from appearing on the ballot is one of the most unDemocratic things you can do.
But, what do you expect from the party who falsely screams "Threat to Democracy!" every chance they get?

I dont think for a minute he is running on policy. you are a fool. he is running to help trump win because trump can not get enough votes to win the election without nonsense like spoilers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And running spoilers to try to throw the election to a candidate that can not win on his own?

Who are you to decide who *can* and *cannot* win on his own?
Who are you to dictate how others should vote?

I am not an idiot. Fighting back against a spoiler is fair game.

Fine. Fight against a candidate based on policy.
Fighting to prevent *anyone* from appearing on the ballot is one of the most unDemocratic things you can do.
But, what do you expect from the party who falsely screams "Threat to Democracy!" every chance they get?

I dont think for a minute he is running on policy. you are a fool. he is running to help trump win because trump can not get enough votes to win the election without nonsense like spoilers.

If Biden is such a great candidate, he should be able to win regardless of who is on the ballot, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nothing says "DEMOCRACY" like working to block ballot access for anyone who is deemed a threat to Biden.........

In the past week the Democratic Party and other outside groups have put together a team to oppose third-party and independent candidates, a sign that Democrats are ready to fight back against candidacies they perceive as spoiler threats, like Kennedy.

The effort is staffed by longtime operatives like communications consultant Lis Smith, who helped guide Pete Buttigieg’s 2020 presidential campaign, and Dana Remus, who until recently served as Biden’s White House counsel, underscoring the seriousness of the concern.

The Democratic National Committee calls Kennedy a “stalking horse” who will increase Trump’s chances of winning in November. They point to significant contributions from Timothy Mellon, a Trump mega donor, to American Values 2024, and to lingering concerns that in 2016 third-party candidates may have tipped the presidency to Trump.

While Democratic attention was initially directed toward the wide array of third-party contenders, such as independent Cornel West and the No Labels coalition, Kennedy has become the focus of more energy as of late.

https://www.politico.com/newsletters/politico-nightly/2024/03/21/rfk-jr-and-the-ballot-access-wars-00148478

No one is blocking ballot access. The states have set rules about signatures and deadlines.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And running spoilers to try to throw the election to a candidate that can not win on his own?

Who are you to decide who *can* and *cannot* win on his own?
Who are you to dictate how others should vote?

I am not an idiot. Fighting back against a spoiler is fair game.

Fine. Fight against a candidate based on policy.
Fighting to prevent *anyone* from appearing on the ballot is one of the most unDemocratic things you can do.
But, what do you expect from the party who falsely screams "Threat to Democracy!" every chance they get?

Pretty rich coming from the people who cut black people from voter rolls for no reason but they are black, or trim the number of polling places causing HUGE lines to cast a vote. I could go on, but it will just go over your head.