Did GOP/Kavanaugh conspire with Whelan to dox and accuse an innocent individual of sexual assault

[Anonymous]

This is what comes up on this link:

"An exact match for christine-b-137b3b3 could not be found.

The LinkedIn profile you're looking for isn't public or doesn't exist. To search and filter million LinkedIn members, log in or join LinkedIn today."

Again, this is why all the news sources were relying on her archived Linked In. And why it is not credible to say that Ford noticed Whelan was accessing her Linked In on Sunday.

***BS - I can pull it up from that link.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her Linkedin page has not been scrubbed - I just pulled it up. It uses an initial for her name but the page is still intact.

lol lol!! ed whelan and CRC can't even get anything right. give up guys.

I am relying on what major news sources say because I don't have Linked in. I find it hard to believe that ABC news is relying on her archived page if a live Linked In were there for the asking. But anything is possible.

Have tried various initial name/combos through Google and nothing is coming up.

Maybe PP who found her LinkedIn could post it.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/christine-b-137b3b3/

This is what comes up on this link:

"An exact match for christine-b-137b3b3 could not be found.

The LinkedIn profile you're looking for isn't public or doesn't exist. To search and filter million LinkedIn members, log in or join LinkedIn today."

Again, this is why all the news sources were relying on her archived Linked In. And why it is not credible to say that Ford noticed Whelan was accessing her Linked In on Sunday.

That's funny -- I got this:

Christine B.

Professor, Palo Alto University and Stanford University Consortium
Stanford, California
Connect Connect with Christine B.More actions

Stanford-PGSP Consortium University of Southern California
University of Southern California
See contact info
See contact info
See connections (329)
329 connections
Specialties: Statisitical Data Analysis
Experience
Stanford-PGSP Consortium
Professor
Company NameStanford-PGSP Consortium
Dates EmployedSep 2012 – Present
Employment Duration6 yrs 1 mo
LocationStanford, California
Teach Statistics, Psychometrics, and Research Methods. Mentor students and Chair Dissertation Committees. Serve on Faculty Senate. Write manuscripts for publication.
Stanford University
Research Psychologist and Biostatistician
... (etc)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It says she looked at her Linked In page on Sunday and noticed Whelan tried to view it. That would not have been possible if she had scrubbed it. And we are pretty sure she hired a professional to scrub her out of the internet unless she is unusually compute savvy. Scrubbing a name as thoroughly from the internet as her name has been scrubbed simply cannot be done in a matter of hours on a Sunday.

The point of the story seems to be to suggest that the White House leaked her name to Whelan because Ford sent the email recording Whelan's attempt 90 minutes after the Post revealed her name to the White House.

The story simply is not plausible and does not line up with the Post's original story breaking her name as it is clear from that her name was out there a few days earlier, the reason given for her deciding to go public on Sunday.

This is an effort on the part of the Wapo reporters to establish a link between Whelan and the White House. It does not succeed.

Apparently WaPo is insinuating that her LinkedIn account was not deleted and Whelan looked her up after being tipped off by WH. If you are challenging that theory - here is another, much worse for Kavanaugh.

The other person who would know it was Dr. Ford is Kavanaugh, if the alleged assault happened. He could have told Whelan that Dr. Ford may disclose her identity...

There is no way Kavanaugh was not privy to what Whelan was doing. Democrats need to investigate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her Linkedin page has not been scrubbed - I just pulled it up. It uses an initial for her name but the page is still intact.

lol lol!! ed whelan and CRC can't even get anything right. give up guys.

I am relying on what major news sources say because I don't have Linked in. I find it hard to believe that ABC news is relying on her archived page if a live Linked In were there for the asking. But anything is possible.

Have tried various initial name/combos through Google and nothing is coming up.

Maybe PP who found her LinkedIn could post it.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/christine-b-137b3b3/

This is what comes up on this link:

"An exact match for christine-b-137b3b3 could not be found.

The LinkedIn profile you're looking for isn't public or doesn't exist. To search and filter million LinkedIn members, log in or join LinkedIn today."

Again, this is why all the news sources were relying on her archived Linked In. And why it is not credible to say that Ford noticed Whelan was accessing her Linked In on Sunday.

That's funny -- I got this:

Christine B.

Professor, Palo Alto University and Stanford University Consortium
Stanford, California
Connect Connect with Christine B.More actions

Stanford-PGSP Consortium University of Southern California
University of Southern California
See contact info
See contact info
See connections (329)
329 connections
Specialties: Statisitical Data Analysis
Experience
Stanford-PGSP Consortium
Professor
Company NameStanford-PGSP Consortium
Dates EmployedSep 2012 – Present
Employment Duration6 yrs 1 mo
LocationStanford, California
Teach Statistics, Psychometrics, and Research Methods. Mentor students and Chair Dissertation Committees. Serve on Faculty Senate. Write manuscripts for publication.
Stanford University
Research Psychologist and Biostatistician
... (etc)

Her account access requires you to have linkedIn account and logged in...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It seems to me that there is zero chance Kavanaugh wasn't involved with this insane bonkers Ed Whelan thing

Exactly. Whelan would not have said anything publicly without first consulting with kavanaugh. Whelan would not want to say something that could jeopardize kavanaugh's confirmation. I'm sure everything said on this matter is carefully scrutinized prior to going on the record. No one just blurts out this sort of detailed info without consent from kavanaugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like Whelan knew Ford's identity before it was publicly released.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/kavanaugh-ally-says-he-did-not-communicate-with-white-house-or-supreme-court-nominee-about-theory-of-another-attacker/2018/09/21/88335f1a-bdaa-11e8-b7d2-0773aa1e33da_story.html?utm_term=.08fb50e939c5

On Sunday, Ford noticed that — even before her name became public — Whelan appeared to be seeking information about her.

That morning, Ford alerted an associate via email that Whelan had looked at her LinkedIn page, according to the email, which was reviewed by The Post. LinkedIn allows some subscribers to see who views their pages. Ford sent the email about 90 minutes after The Post shared her name with a White House spokesman and hours before her identity was revealed in a story posted on its website.

A White House spokesman said Friday that neither Kavanaugh nor anyone in the White House gave Ford’s name to Whelan before it was disclosed by The Post. Whelan did not respond to a request for comment on how he first learned of Ford’s identity.

Can someone explain this?

I thought her Linked In had been scrubbed along with everything else. Some people were able to get to an archived copy of her Linked In, which takes some knowledge and skill, but would she have been able to get an alert of people accessing an archived copy? If so she must have gotten thousands of alerts once her name was released.

that's the point - he went to her LinkedIn page before her name was leaked

It takes a lot of work and knowledge to scrub yourself from the internet. It doesn't seem credible that she managed to do it all between hearing from Whelan and the Post disclosure. Even people who are very tech savvy run into difficulties--like forgetting their passwords that allow them to disable their accounts. This is why people often hire firms to do the scrubbing.

She hired security before the WaPo article. That's what they do.

Precisely.

And in fact, according to the original WaPo article she knew her name was out there much earlier--a Buzzfeed reporter attempted to talk to her as she left a classroom, presumably on Friday. So the article claiming she received an alert about Whelan accessing her Linked In on Sunday makes no sense--her Linked In could not have been live at that point.

This isn't my field, but I am pretty sure she would not have received an alert about Whelan accessing her archived Linked In page. The archive was no doubt the way reporters armed with her name were able to track her down at her university.

so you think she's just lying, whereas you just get to make up any facts you want?

Nope--the story likely came from the "associate" mentioned in the article. Both sides of this story seem to have a number of people who are trying to help out one or the other and who can't seem to help tripping up in their bungled efforts.

The WP was shown a copy of the email.

[Anonymous]

I was able to see her LinkedIn profile, no problem. You have to be logged in.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/kavanaugh-ally-says-he-did-not-communicate-with-white-house-or-supreme-court-nominee-about-theory-of-another-attacker/2018/09/21/88335f1a-bdaa-11e8-b7d2-0773aa1e33da_story.html

90 minutes from when the White House received the letter to when Whelan accessed her LinkedIn account. If her name was redacted from the letter the WH received, then the only way Whelan could have know it was Ford was from Kavanaugh directly. Which means Kavanaugh identified Ford as a person he assaulted.

[Anonymous]

I didn't see a link to Whelan's tweet on here. Here's a link with the face and name of the Atlanta school teacher redacted. https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/whelan-nutbar-twitter-thread-preserved-for-posterity

I saw the teacher's name on a letter of endorsement for Kavanaugh. The link above shows his yearbook page and he definitely was friends with Judge and Kavanaugh. The fact that he's not screaming tells me Whelan had his permission. I hope the Atlanta school he works for removes him from the classroom until he can be investigated. I also think there needs to be an investigation on how Whelan got Dr. Ford's name before it was published and how much Kavanaugh knows about this plot. Dr. Ford has already said she was friends with (teacher) and visited him when he was in the hospital. It's frightening that these lawyers run this country and they are so stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It says she looked at her Linked In page on Sunday and noticed Whelan tried to view it. That would not have been possible if she had scrubbed it. And we are pretty sure she hired a professional to scrub her out of the internet unless she is unusually compute savvy. Scrubbing a name as thoroughly from the internet as her name has been scrubbed simply cannot be done in a matter of hours on a Sunday.

The point of the story seems to be to suggest that the White House leaked her name to Whelan because Ford sent the email recording Whelan's attempt 90 minutes after the Post revealed her name to the White House.

The story simply is not plausible and does not line up with the Post's original story breaking her name as it is clear from that her name was out there a few days earlier, the reason given for her deciding to go public on Sunday.

This is an effort on the part of the Wapo reporters to establish a link between Whelan and the White House. It does not succeed.

Apparently WaPo is insinuating that her LinkedIn account was not deleted and Whelan looked her up after being tipped off by WH. If you are challenging that theory - here is another, much worse for Kavanaugh.

The other person who would know it was Dr. Ford is Kavanaugh, if the alleged assault happened. He could have told Whelan that Dr. Ford may disclose her identity...

There is no way Kavanaugh was not privy to what Whelan was doing. Democrats need to investigate.

yep - that's exactly right. it seems hard to imagine kavanaugh wasn't involved in this. which means he must have known who was accusing him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It says she looked at her Linked In page on Sunday and noticed Whelan tried to view it. That would not have been possible if she had scrubbed it. And we are pretty sure she hired a professional to scrub her out of the internet unless she is unusually compute savvy. Scrubbing a name as thoroughly from the internet as her name has been scrubbed simply cannot be done in a matter of hours on a Sunday.

The point of the story seems to be to suggest that the White House leaked her name to Whelan because Ford sent the email recording Whelan's attempt 90 minutes after the Post revealed her name to the White House.

The story simply is not plausible and does not line up with the Post's original story breaking her name as it is clear from that her name was out there a few days earlier, the reason given for her deciding to go public on Sunday.

This is an effort on the part of the Wapo reporters to establish a link between Whelan and the White House. It does not succeed.

Apparently WaPo is insinuating that her LinkedIn account was not deleted and Whelan looked her up after being tipped off by WH. If you are challenging that theory - here is another, much worse for Kavanaugh.

The other person who would know it was Dr. Ford is Kavanaugh, if the alleged assault happened. He could have told Whelan that Dr. Ford may disclose her identity...

There is no way Kavanaugh was not privy to what Whelan was doing. Democrats need to investigate.

yep - that's exactly right. it seems hard to imagine kavanaugh wasn't involved in this. which means he must have known who was accusing him.

Of course he did. What a POS.

[Anonymous]

Her LinkedIn Account is fully accessible to anyone logged into LinkedIn.

How hard is this to understand?

[Anonymous]

I cannot imagine anyone who learned her name not looking her up. That was the first thing I did. And, I found that pretty much everything was wiped clean.

So, here is where we are from what I have seen reported. Not vouching for these reports.

Sometime in the early '80s, Ford remembers that she was assaulted by Kavanaugh and told no one.
2012: Ford remembered an event that took place years and years ago. This memory was reported while in therapy--and therapist wrote that four boys were involved. No names.
Sometime in 2012: Ford told her husband that it was Kavanaugh.
Also in 2012: Kavanaugh's name was reported to be on short list of SC nominees if Romney was elected.

My question: did the news report about Romney prompt Ford to tell her husband that Kavanaugh was the guy?

2018: Ford reports that there were only two guys in the room. One was Mark Judge.

July 2018: Feinstein gets letter--which has not been released to the public or the Committee Chair (Grassley) Reportedly, Ford asked to remain anonymous.
Meanwhile, Ford hires "resister" lawyers to represent her. She takes a polygraph. At some point she pretty much is removed from social media. There was a news report where she was participating in a "science protest" against this administration and wore a pink hat crocheted to resemble a brain.

It is not unreasonable to assume that she spent the time since July with her lawyers preparing for going public.
After the lawyers saying she wanted to come forward and tell her story (two weeks ago) she has been underground. She has reported death threats (which I absolutely believe--this seems to be common these days. However, many others involved on the other side have also received death threats.)

Stories are now swirling around that she does not wish to fly. This I also believe could be true--although, it would be interesting to know how long she has followed this practice.

Bottom line: it is her word against Kavanaugh's.
I do think women should be taken seriously. However, it is not unreasonable to believe that she would never have come forward with these allegations, had Kavanaugh been nominated by Obama.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[…]
I do think women should be taken seriously. However, it is not unreasonable to believe that she would never have come forward with these allegations, had Kavanaugh been nominated by Obama.

That actually is pretty unreasonable. You’re suggesting that’s she came forward out of some sadistic partisan loyalty when there’s zero evidence for that.

And it’s insanely unreasonable to suggest that Obama would have ever nominated the partisan hack that is Kavanaugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Her LinkedIn Account is fully accessible to anyone logged into LinkedIn.

How hard is this to understand?

It's hard to understand if you're Ed Whelan and associates (who did not even realize that Ford would see who had been snooping her account).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I cannot imagine anyone who learned her name not looking her up. That was the first thing I did. And, I found that pretty much everything was wiped clean.

So, here is where we are from what I have seen reported. Not vouching for these reports.

Sometime in the early '80s, Ford remembers that she was assaulted by Kavanaugh and told no one.
2012: Ford remembered an event that took place years and years ago. This memory was reported while in therapy--and therapist wrote that four boys were involved. No names.
Sometime in 2012: Ford told her husband that it was Kavanaugh.
Also in 2012: Kavanaugh's name was reported to be on short list of SC nominees if Romney was elected.

My question: did the news report about Romney prompt Ford to tell her husband that Kavanaugh was the guy?

2018: Ford reports that there were only two guys in the room. One was Mark Judge.

July 2018: Feinstein gets letter--which has not been released to the public or the Committee Chair (Grassley) Reportedly, Ford asked to remain anonymous.
Meanwhile, Ford hires "resister" lawyers to represent her. She takes a polygraph. At some point she pretty much is removed from social media. There was a news report where she was participating in a "science protest" against this administration and wore a pink hat crocheted to resemble a brain.

It is not unreasonable to assume that she spent the time since July with her lawyers preparing for going public.
After the lawyers saying she wanted to come forward and tell her story (two weeks ago) she has been underground. She has reported death threats (which I absolutely believe--this seems to be common these days. However, many others involved on the other side have also received death threats.)

Stories are now swirling around that she does not wish to fly. This I also believe could be true--although, it would be interesting to know how long she has followed this practice.

Bottom line: it is her word against Kavanaugh's.
I do think women should be taken seriously. However, it is not unreasonable to believe that she would never have come forward with these allegations, had Kavanaugh been nominated by Obama.

Thanks for the summary.
One big question I have, and if she testifies, I hope she is asked.....
If she didn’t want to go public, and she wanted to remain anonymous, what did she expect Diane Feinstein to do with her letter? What did she hope the outcome to be?