Did GOP/Kavanaugh conspire with Whelan to dox and accuse an innocent individual of sexual assault

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think Wheelan may be right. Simply because Ford claims she couldn’t have mixed them up, that doesn’t discredit the possibility that she did. Ford is clearly motivated by a political goal.

I agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Wheelan may be right. Simply because Ford claims she couldn’t have mixed them up, that doesn’t discredit the possibility that she did. Ford is clearly motivated by a political goal.

I agree.

In that case you would definitely be rooting for and calling your GOP leaders to ensure they investigate this by professional investigators, rather than the invetigator-wanna-be Whacky Whelan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Wheelan may be right. Simply because Ford claims she couldn’t have mixed them up, that doesn’t discredit the possibility that she did. Ford is clearly motivated by a political goal.

What’s it like, you living your sad online life having no morality or decency whatsoever?

Because I’m unwilling to crucify someone based on an unproven, *mere* allegation? Have you no decency, sir?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Wheelan may be right. Simply because Ford claims she couldn’t have mixed them up, that doesn’t discredit the possibility that she did. Ford is clearly motivated by a political goal.

I agree.

In that case you would definitely be rooting for and calling your GOP leaders to ensure they investigate this by professional investigators, rather than the invetigator-wanna-be Whacky Whelan.

Why should a 36 year old allegation be investigated by law enforcement, when no crime has even been reported to law enforcement? What a waste of resources.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Wheelan may be right. Simply because Ford claims she couldn’t have mixed them up, that doesn’t discredit the possibility that she did. Ford is clearly motivated by a political goal.

What’s it like, you living your sad online life having no morality or decency whatsoever?

Because I’m unwilling to crucify someone based on an unproven, *mere* allegation? Have you no decency, sir?

I'm willing to crucify Whelan for this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Wheelan may be right. Simply because Ford claims she couldn’t have mixed them up, that doesn’t discredit the possibility that she did. Ford is clearly motivated by a political goal.

I agree.

In that case you would definitely be rooting for and calling your GOP leaders to ensure they investigate this by professional investigators, rather than the invetigator-wanna-be Whacky Whelan.

Why should a 36 year old allegation be investigated by law enforcement, when no crime has even been reported to law enforcement? What a waste of resources.

so if you'll believe this now apologized for and removed twitter investigation, I suppose you'll believe an investigation that the other side does on its own.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Wheelan may be right. Simply because Ford claims she couldn’t have mixed them up, that doesn’t discredit the possibility that she did. Ford is clearly motivated by a political goal.

What’s it like, you living your sad online life having no morality or decency whatsoever?

Because I’m unwilling to crucify someone based on an unproven, *mere* allegation? Have you no decency, sir?

You are deeply dishonest and indecent. There are no indicators whatsoever that Ford is spurred by politics. You should be so ashamed of yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Wheelan may be right. Simply because Ford claims she couldn’t have mixed them up, that doesn’t discredit the possibility that she did. Ford is clearly motivated by a political goal.

I agree.

In that case you would definitely be rooting for and calling your GOP leaders to ensure they investigate this by professional investigators, rather than the invetigator-wanna-be Whacky Whelan.

Why should a 36 year old allegation be investigated by law enforcement, when no crime has even been reported to law enforcement? What a waste of resources.

Determining the legitimacy of a Supreme Court candidate, who will serve for a lifetime, is hardly a waste of resources.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Wheelan may be right. Simply because Ford claims she couldn’t have mixed them up, that doesn’t discredit the possibility that she did. Ford is clearly motivated by a political goal.

I agree.

In that case you would definitely be rooting for and calling your GOP leaders to ensure they investigate this by professional investigators, rather than the invetigator-wanna-be Whacky Whelan.

Why should a 36 year old allegation be investigated by law enforcement, when no crime has even been reported to law enforcement? What a waste of resources.

Determining the legitimacy of a Supreme Court candidate, who will serve for a lifetime, is hardly a waste of resources.

Otherwise, he would always be an illegitimate justice like Trump is an illegitimate President.

[Anonymous]

This is one of the lowest things I have ever heard. Someone needs to look into this. This poor man is now being accused and thrown into this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is one of the lowest things I have ever heard. Someone needs to look into this. This poor man is now being accused and thrown into this.

This is what ethics looks like nowadays.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is one of the lowest things I have ever heard. Someone needs to look into this. This poor man is now being accused and thrown into this.

Or worse still, there is the possibility that he is being paid to be the fall guy until Brett’s on the bench.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is one of the lowest things I have ever heard. Someone needs to look into this. This poor man is now being accused and thrown into this.

Or worse still, there is the possibility that he is being paid to be the fall guy until Brett’s on the bench.

In that case, he should be called to testify too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is one of the lowest things I have ever heard. Someone needs to look into this. This poor man is now being accused and thrown into this.

Or worse still, there is the possibility that he is being paid to be the fall guy until Brett’s on the bench.

I felt bad for him until I read this. Dear lord.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Wheelan may be right. Simply because Ford claims she couldn’t have mixed them up, that doesn’t discredit the possibility that she did. Ford is clearly motivated by a political goal.

I agree.

In that case you would definitely be rooting for and calling your GOP leaders to ensure they investigate this by professional investigators, rather than the invetigator-wanna-be Whacky Whelan.

Why should a 36 year old allegation be investigated by law enforcement, when no crime has even been reported to law enforcement? What a waste of resources.

Because we are talking about a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court. This isn’t a criminal proceeding.