Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Here is the real problem, PP. Everybody has a different idea of what "sick" means. I totally agree that children with fevers and very sick should stay home. I feel that way more for the child's health than for others, but the result is the same. But this isn't what you guys are saying. Many of you PPs are saying that you don't want a kid with even a runny nose out in public, and that is just plain ridiculous. Nobody here is saying to take a kid in public if it would violate a daycare/preschool policy. What we are saying is that all b/c YOU think my kid is sick b/c he has a runny nose does not mean that he is so sick that he needs to be quarantined at home.
If you are THAT concerned about germs (to the extent that a runny nose bothers you), then seriously - YOU need to stay away from public places b/c many people are sick and contagious before they show any symptoms at all.
Well stated, thanks.
My child's colds are like mine: one or two days of feeling really lousy, maybe a touch of fever (and we stay home those days), followed by a week of runny nose and lingering cough. I absolutely keep her at home when she is listless and ill; once she gets her appetite and energy back, starts sleeping through the night again, and is generally back to her fun self, we resume our lives, no matter what her nose is doing. And if one of you ill-mannered kowtow-to-me-and-mine type parents gets in my face about it, you will get the most (politely delivered-- there are kids around) vicious tongue-lashing of your life.