Message
OP, it all depends on how much you are willing to pay. If you pay $30 per hr, you would get a good candidates even if it is just for one month.
Post on Nextdoor or the nanny fb groups. But id wait until May it’s too early to book someone unless you pay a retainer
Hi i m looking for a job as nanny ...we can talk about the nanny position if You wish and the Rent
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:anyone making the nanny work there? If she is forced to do it, its akin to human trafficking. If she is not forced to work there, then she is happy with what she is getting, she can always leave and work somewhere else.


The most naive take. Or you’re trying to assuage your own guilt because you also pay illegally and pitifully low. If not, you’re missing the huge power imbalance. In this situation the power is more unfairly balanced than in a typical employer/employee relationship. Isn’t this obvious? I guess not. Lots of people are missing the obvious in the country.


It all depends on the area and demand for Nannies.


Also, it’s nannies, since when is Nanny/Nannies a proper noun? Why do so many posters on this forum have a lack of knowledge of this? It makes you look dim.

It’s a proper noun here. Suck it up.


Except, it’s not. Suck it up and go back to school or continue to be uneducated. You’ll also continue to look dumb to everyone around you. This is second grade level information.


It’s autocorrect on my phone. No one is on here trying to write PhD essays. Try to stay on topic.
Anonymous wrote: thank you I hear your point, but the law supports a different approach


Why would the law support him paying for your AP when you both have 50-50 and equal income.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:anyone making the nanny work there? If she is forced to do it, its akin to human trafficking. If she is not forced to work there, then she is happy with what she is getting, she can always leave and work somewhere else.


The most naive take. Or you’re trying to assuage your own guilt because you also pay illegally and pitifully low. If not, you’re missing the huge power imbalance. In this situation the power is more unfairly balanced than in a typical employer/employee relationship. Isn’t this obvious? I guess not. Lots of people are missing the obvious in the country.


It all depends on the area and demand for Nannies.


Also, it’s nannies, since when is Nanny/Nannies a proper noun? Why do so many posters on this forum have a lack of knowledge of this? It makes you look dim.

It’s a proper noun here. Suck it up.


Except, it’s not. Suck it up and go back to school or continue to be uneducated. You’ll also continue to look dumb to everyone around you. This is second grade level information.
thank you I hear your point, but the law supports a different approach
Well, usually live in nannies do make less. Some people might prefer this arrangement, since they save a lot on rent and commuting. It depends on the people involved. Post and ad and see OP.
Anonymous wrote:A nanny told me she’s more formal and less affectionate with the toddler she takes care of, no hugs or anything like that. She said some mothers would be upset if their child got any kind of hug from a nanny.

*If cameras are suspected…
A nanny told me she’s more formal and less affectionate with the toddler she takes care of, no hugs or anything like that. She said some mothers would be upset if their child got any kind of hug from a nanny.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:anyone making the nanny work there? If she is forced to do it, its akin to human trafficking. If she is not forced to work there, then she is happy with what she is getting, she can always leave and work somewhere else.


The most naive take. Or you’re trying to assuage your own guilt because you also pay illegally and pitifully low. If not, you’re missing the huge power imbalance. In this situation the power is more unfairly balanced than in a typical employer/employee relationship. Isn’t this obvious? I guess not. Lots of people are missing the obvious in the country.


It all depends on the area and demand for Nannies.


Also, it’s nannies, since when is Nanny/Nannies a proper noun? Why do so many posters on this forum have a lack of knowledge of this? It makes you look dim.

It’s a proper noun here. Suck it up.
Then you pay for it. You need the child care, he doesn't. You make almost equal money and each have the kids for the same amount of time.
https://www.ncsl.org/human-services/child-support-guideline-models

One of the best resources I’ve seen—again Maryland uses “income shares” model, which adds in the total childcare cost, even if different care providers.
Yeah, maybe I’m not explaining it well. I tried to go light on description but probably made it worse. In sum—My ex is a documented abusiver, criminal and alcoholic past. He works from home. Makes good money. I do not work from home. I make less money but decent. I have had an au Pair assisting my house, and it works well for my kids and au pairs already. However We cannot share an au pair. No Au Pair wants to go work for my ex given his treatment towards them when they do, and his criminal history. However I REQUIRE more care due to my nature of my job— and I don’t work from home. Au pairs have already been working for me, in my home, and like it here, with me and my kids, and it works best for us and my job; we occasionally tried them working at his house, but it didn’t go well and the au pairs refused. No Au Pair agency is going to make them work in his house where they don’t feel safe, given past of POs, abuse and criminal history. Also The Maryland law already states that childcare costs will be shared pro rata (combined cost, apportioned divided proportional to income) in ANY post divorce. See below. NOTE: That’s NOT unique to me!! That is the existing law. Hence why I was asking if anyone has actually had this experience of dividing up childcare in Maryland prorata??
——————————-
Fyi, the Law:

§ 12-204.
(a) (1) The basic child support obligation shall be determined in accordance with the schedule of basic child support obligations in subsection (e) of this section. The basic child support obligation shall be divided between the parents in proportion to their adjusted actual incomes.
—————————
So, again this is the law and it's quite common —unfortunately I just don't know of anyone at this point myself. Any of you who think it’s just not fair to him well, there’s many things in life that people perceive are unfair. I think it’s unfair that given his abusive criminal past I still have to try to do 50-50 custody sharing him. But, so it is!

I appreciate people’s feedback, but some of you that say I am being unreasonable— I really don’t think you understand my situation. Again, I welcome hearing from anyone who has actually shared Childcare prorata in Maryland, using different care providers for the same children (esp if one was au pair?) How did you demonstrate calculations? Many thanks!
College students are back at school in August unless you can find one who doesn't go back until September. Your best bet is going to be camps or whatever your 3 year old does the rest of the year.
Go to: 
FreeMarker template error (DEBUG mode; use RETHROW in production!): Template inclusion failed (for parameter value "addivs/bottom.htm"): Template not found for name "default/addivs/bottom.htm". The name was interpreted by this TemplateLoader: FileTemplateLoader(baseDir="/var/lib/tomcat/webapps/nanny-forum/templates", canonicalBasePath="/var/lib/tomcat/webapps/nanny-forum/templates/"). ---- FTL stack trace ("~" means nesting-related): - Failed at: #include "addivs/bottom.htm" [in template "default/user_posts_show.htm" at line 131, column 1] ---- Java stack trace (for programmers): ---- freemarker.core._MiscTemplateException: [... Exception message was already printed; see it above ...] at freemarker.core.Include.accept(Include.java:160) at freemarker.core.Environment.visit(Environment.java:324) at freemarker.core.MixedContent.accept(MixedContent.java:54) at freemarker.core.Environment.visit(Environment.java:324) at freemarker.core.Environment.process(Environment.java:302) at freemarker.template.Template.process(Template.java:325) at net.jforum.JForum.processCommand(JForum.java:233) at net.jforum.JForum.service(JForum.java:200) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:623) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:210) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:154) at org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.WsFilter.doFilter(WsFilter.java:51) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:179) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:154) at net.jforum.util.legacy.clickstream.ClickstreamFilter.doFilter(ClickstreamFilter.java:59) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:179) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:154) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:168) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:90) at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:481) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:130) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:93) at org.apache.catalina.valves.AbstractAccessLogValve.invoke(AbstractAccessLogValve.java:670) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:74) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:346) at org.apache.coyote.ajp.AjpProcessor.service(AjpProcessor.java:424) at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProcessorLight.process(AbstractProcessorLight.java:63) at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$ConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:928) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.doRun(NioEndpoint.java:1786) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.SocketProcessorBase.run(SocketProcessorBase.java:52) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1191) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:659) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread$WrappingRunnable.run(TaskThread.java:63) at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840) Caused by: freemarker.template.TemplateNotFoundException: Template not found for name "default/addivs/bottom.htm". The name was interpreted by this TemplateLoader: FileTemplateLoader(baseDir="/var/lib/tomcat/webapps/nanny-forum/templates", canonicalBasePath="/var/lib/tomcat/webapps/nanny-forum/templates/"). at freemarker.template.Configuration.getTemplate(Configuration.java:1833) at freemarker.core.Environment.getTemplateForInclusion(Environment.java:2044) at freemarker.core.Include.accept(Include.java:158) ... 33 more Messages posted by Anonymous

Information
 

An error has occurred.

For detailed error information, please see the HTML source code, and contact the forum Administrator.

freemarker.template.TemplateNotFoundException: Template not found for name "default/addivs/bottom.htm".
The name was interpreted by this TemplateLoader: FileTemplateLoader(baseDir="/var/lib/tomcat/webapps/nanny-forum/templates", canonicalBasePath="/var/lib/tomcat/webapps/nanny-forum/templates/").
 
Forum Index