You can disagree with someone but to insult them, call them names, and rant like this just makes you look small. I automatically dismiss anything you have to say because of your hyperbolic vitriol |
Thank you for your views.
Nanny B is going to be my first preference provided I have no issues during the one month trial. I tried her 2 more times for part time care and found her to be very willing to help. She even cooked a decent pasta salad that my kiddo liked. I heard from one of the references for Nanny A but it was given by a professor who had good things to say about her as a student. That is well and good but am doubtful if she would be able to manage a full time nanny position involving some amount of cooking as well. I feel that nannies who have families are generally used to and better with cooking. A single nanny might not be used to cooking and I have no way to try her out either. |
I don't know if I'd make that generalization about cooking. A younger nanny might have less experience cooking and therefore not be ready to cook for a family she works for. Older nannies typically have more experience with cooking...single ones and those with a family. I know plenty of nannies who are married and/or have kids of their own whose cooking you couldn't pay me to eat on a regular basis. On the flip side I know several single nannies (late 20s-early 30s...myself included) who are great cooks and whose nanny families love what is made. Cooking is usually a result of experience as well as effort and interest...not necessarily one's family status. |
Sounds like you made a good choice. I would not be ok with nanny a if all she could provide was a reference from a professor from school and not real babysitting experience. |