You're being obtuse. The ad was for silver spring. $10/hour is not market for even the most basic of nannies. $10/hour would be an appropriate live in rate depending on the job requirements. For live out she'd need to pay more like $15/hour, nanny could find a 2 bedroom apartment and a roommate, paying $600-700/month for her portion AND not have to live with her boss and have someone telling her how to live her life. |
For a first or second position, less then 2 years of experience working with children, fine. Third position or later and/or more than 2 years of experience? NO WAY! Sorry, but I live-in exclusively. That's a horrible rate! |
I work as a live in for $500 a week flat, 52 weeks a year. My kids are school aged, so most of the time I'm only working 15hrs a week, I take on various jobs during the day, including dog walking and some babysitting of young kids, I also do light housekeeping for the family (I do all of the laundry and grocery shopping, walk the dog once a day, and do an overnight once a month). Snow days, teacher work days and SOME summer weeks are longer hours, up to 45, but even in summer the kids are often signed up for half day camps. I do not vacation with my family, but they take approx. 4 weeks off a year and I try to time my vacations with theirs. On the weeks I'm at 15hrs, my pay is $33/hr and the weeks I'm at 45, it comes to $10/hr. I love my arrangement! |
I agree. As long as people are willing to work for $5/Hr., then people will continue paying such ridiculous wages. |