Anonymous wrote:The whole world hasn’t decided how it feels about Coach yet. Stay tuned
Anonymous wrote:I don't like any bags with logos.
Anonymous wrote:Op here: stigma being its now a mid-range low quality brand, people have strong feelings about the brand, the raids, the counterfeits, the purses being seen as “tacky”, etc
Just from my search I created this post here without reviving any of the old threads, here’s a few where this feeling is expressed:
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1215420.page#27878685
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1147407.page
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1124516.page
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1231891.page#28493361
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the States there’s a stigma associated with Coach brand which surprised me given they are making what could be considered a comeback.
I’m 40, I am old enough to remember the good quality Coach days and the terrible cloth logo days.
Have you seen Coach lately? I left the brand long ago, but the new bags are gorgeous.
Anonymous wrote:In the States there’s a stigma associated with Coach brand which surprised me given they are making what could be considered a comeback.
I’m 40, I am old enough to remember the good quality Coach days and the terrible cloth logo days.
Anonymous wrote:I'm also 40 and yeah, Coach does have a stigma associated with it.
I know that it is trendy again and their true vintage bags are great quality, but I'm not sure I'd ever be able to bring myself to buy a new Coach bag. When I was a young adult they were definitely considered "Hermes for Housekeepers": a brand poor people considered fancy and aspirational but that actual rich people would not wear.
I also probably could never bring myself to buy Michael Kors for the same reason.