Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do a search. This has been discussed and debated so many times.
Each person who starts to rewatch the series thinks they're having a unique thought, but in reality it's an annual thread on DCUM:
Watched Sex and the City for the first time in a while
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/912349.page
Rewatching Sex and the City
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/843691.page
Carrie Bradshaw is a loser
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/782267.page
Is it just me or was Carrie Bradshaw the most annoying character from the 90s?
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/567698.page
Anonymous wrote:The reason it is bad is because it is not sympathetically written about women in those situations, it was written by a team of gay men and really it should have been about gay men in NYC it would have been a lot more entertaining and still interesting to watch now. Because of that disconnect it was and is, terrible.
Anonymous wrote:Do a search. This has been discussed and debated so many times.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I never fell for the appeal of this show. I found it mildly amusing. The women who loved it in the nineties were so transparent and 'faux feminist'. It appealed to the masses I guess.
I agree and I think I was the target audience (white woman born in 70s, lived in NYC in the 90s). However, there were certain observations that, at the time, spoke to a certain truth that was not otherwise being voiced. The “he’s just not that into you” episode stuck with me. The one where Samantha gets frustrated that women are expected to wax everything and men aren’t. The one where carrie complains that women who get married and have babies have all sorts of celebrations of those moments but women who make other decisions go uncelebrated by their friends. And, at least back in the 90s (probably less true now), the observation that a bi guy is generally always going to dump you for a man.
So I wasn’t a huge fan, thought the character were mostly annoying, but—like Seinfeld—there were certain observations made in it that we’re not being said openly other places.
Anonymous wrote:I never fell for the appeal of this show. I found it mildly amusing. The women who loved it in the nineties were so transparent and 'faux feminist'. It appealed to the masses I guess.
Anonymous wrote:I used to love this show but it does not hold up. I used to think Carrie was the epitome of cool, but she seems clingy and mean! Kristen Davis's acting is painful. Cynthia Nixon is terrific of course, as is Kim Cattrall, but overall the dialogue is stilted and it's just...BIZARRE to watch. Very dated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone takes this show way too seriously....
Yup. It's weird how much rage this old show inspires. No one talks about the influence Seinfeld had on young men because they would sound insane if they did.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nixon is terrific? Lol. Everyone always hated her character. Everything about her is repulsive.
I don't remember that narrative at all. I remember people complaining about the way she was styled on the show -- Nixon is a lovely woman but Miranda was always styled to look as awkward and ugly as possible. But I don't remember anyone saying she was repulsive. Most of my friends found her the most tolerable of the quartet -- a lot of lawyers in my circle of friends and people identified a lot more with her than with any of the others except maybe Samantha at times (but her character is a caricature much of the time).
Anonymous wrote:Everyone takes this show way too seriously....