+100 I'm a normal weight or the thinner side of normal according to BMI and height weight charts. I wear tiny sizes because of vanity sizing and people tell me I'm thin when I'm not, just normal. I don't understand why the 200 lb poster with the pictures thinks that no one would think this is what 200 lbs looks like. I would have guessed 200 lbs. |
I'm also on the thinner side of normal, but I wouldn't have guessed 200lbs.
I envy her self-confidence, even if she is on the heavier side. I'm sure I have a body image issue, but I wish I could enjoy a glass of wine without thinking that one glass will make me fat. |
Believe me, I'm not confident now!!! At 160 (white dress), yes. And that was not overweight, IMO. But I do think it's a matter of discussing this with women who are on the thinner side and prefer the lean look. I remember a thread not too long ago about Scarlett Jo on the beach and the women here thought she looked fat! ![]() |
I am very normal, not thin, not overweight. I am 5'5" and 140 pounds. I would really like to lose 10 to 15 pounds. At that weight I would have a flat stomach, which I've never had.
Despite being normal, certain heavier coworkers are constantly telling me to eat more, that I'm so skinny, that if I lose any weight their will be nothing left, etc. It drives me bonkers. Americans definitely have a distorted view of what is normal. |
I am the PP who just said I was normal. I think SJ looks fabulous there. But she probably weighs no more than 120-130 there. |
So do I. But the women of DCUM gave her a beating. Same with Kim K who I think has an absolutely fantastic body. ![]() |
To the PP with the pics:
You look very good wearing your bikini. After 3 children??? yes! I am 28 yo, no children and am recovering from a big weight loss (50 lbs) and believe me: at 150 and 5,7" you look way better than me! I am white and my skin looks awful and full of stretch marks. you go girl! |
but you didn't need to lose 10-15lbs - you needed to lose 30+ lbs. And yes, I agree with the PP - you do not look sexy or attractive. Its a skewed conception based on the fact that many other women who look like you are likely even heavier. I live in a predominately African American area and at the pool, you are right, you would be considered rail thin. |
Question for you: Which body type do you find more attractive: Kim K and Beyonce or Giselle and Natalie Portman? |
I just have no self-control. I have a perfect life aside from this. Good marriage, great kids, successful jobs, educated, etc... and I have both the means (time, access to a gym) and the money to exercise. I am lazy. I hate exercising. I hate sweating. And I eat when I am happy, sad, depressed, celebrating something, bored, and on and on! I eat all the time and I love food.
I occasionally catch a glimpse of myself on the mirror and think, "Wow, I look huge". But more often than not I think, "I look pretty good!" But in pictures is where I look gross. So I avoid the lens. I am 30-40 lbs overweight. |
I hope it's not Linda but I have a bad feeling....... |
Kim and Beyonce are both very fit. Just a different body type. PP's pictures are not fit at all. |
AA Man here. Unfortunately, you are 100% correct. |
I think you might be confused. I never claimed to be fit. Only that, at 160, I felt sexy and I want to get back there. If you believe I was fat in the white dress, you're clearly just not willing to admit when you're wrong. There's nothing remotely fat about me in that pic. The other pics I posted was just to show my weight gain, so I know I wasn't fit in those....That's kind of my point. |
I think the PP with the pics does look better than her weight would suggest - I certainly would look far worse on that weight. For one, she somehow looks taller than 5' 2''. That said, there is no comparison between that and Kim K or Scarlett Johansson. They are clearly several dozen pounds lighter than PP on what she considers to be her best photo ("white dress"). |