Anonymous wrote:

FrankWinston wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Next to Madison, Hayfield has the best chance to win the championship of any FCPS this season. Can we get rid of the hate for the next month so the kids can focus on football. These are children we are talking about.

So to you, high school football is more important than finding out the truth, seeing if laws were broken etc. Yikes.

Also, these aren't children we are talking about, most are in their late teens. Don't try and make them more sympathetic figures by framing them in the same lens as a ten year old. Also, most of us are talking about the adults who got the "children" as you call them to lie and possibly break the law and not the "children" themselves, many of whom had to know they were violating rules at a minimum.

Anyone under 18 is still a child. These are kids persuing special interests, growing, and navigating through life.

There is a hot special place for every one of the white supremacists targeting this children and interfering with the Hayfield season because of the color of their skin and their coaches skin.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one is rooting for Hayfraud. They shouldn’t even be able to play because of their VHSL violations. No one likes a cheater.

How’d they cheat?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Next to Madison, Hayfield has the best chance to win the championship of any FCPS this season. Can we get rid of the hate for the next month so the kids can focus on football. These are children we are talking about.

Nope, we only root for non-cheating teams here in FCPS

Also, what about the 2023 Hayfield players that were summarily booted (or chased) off the team when Overton showed w/his crew from PWC ? Do you care about those children ? And I am some of those had to be black, given the makeup of the school.

None were booted. The kids that wanted to compete, stayed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

FrankWinston wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Next to Madison, Hayfield has the best chance to win the championship of any FCPS this season. Can we get rid of the hate for the next month so the kids can focus on football. These are children we are talking about.

So to you, high school football is more important than finding out the truth, seeing if laws were broken etc. Yikes.

Also, these aren't children we are talking about, most are in their late teens. Don't try and make them more sympathetic figures by framing them in the same lens as a ten year old. Also, most of us are talking about the adults who got the "children" as you call them to lie and possibly break the law and not the "children" themselves, many of whom had to know they were violating rules at a minimum.

Anyone under 18 is still a child. These are kids persuing special interests, growing, and navigating through life.

There is a hot special place for every one of the white supremacists targeting this children and interfering with the Hayfield season because of the color of their skin and their coaches skin.

Technically speaking, the group of young adult cheaters that are being lead by actual adult cheaters (coaches, parents and administrators), are adolescents. This is the age group between 12-18 years old. Medically, it’s also based on height, weight and the presence of body hair. Those in this age bracket can be held accountable as adults from a legal perspective.

So, there is an especially hot place for all those that continue to use the race card in a situation that does not warrant it. This is not a race issue. It is a right/wrong, ethical, moral and legal issue. Legal because they all committed fraud. When this deflection tactic is used, you are likely a narcissist. Any rational, healthy, honestly adult, regardless of color of skin can see this. Please step aside.

Anonymous wrote:

FrankWinston wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Next to Madison, Hayfield has the best chance to win the championship of any FCPS this season. Can we get rid of the hate for the next month so the kids can focus on football. These are children we are talking about.

So to you, high school football is more important than finding out the truth, seeing if laws were broken etc. Yikes.

Also, these aren't children we are talking about, most are in their late teens. Don't try and make them more sympathetic figures by framing them in the same lens as a ten year old. Also, most of us are talking about the adults who got the "children" as you call them to lie and possibly break the law and not the "children" themselves, many of whom had to know they were violating rules at a minimum.

Anyone under 18 is still a child. These are kids persuing special interests, growing, and navigating through life.

There is a hot special place for every one of the white supremacists targeting this children and interfering with the Hayfield season because of the color of their skin and their coaches skin.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one is rooting for Hayfraud. They shouldn’t even be able to play because of their VHSL violations. No one likes a cheater.

How’d they cheat?

How you so lazy? (Read the thread).

FrankWinston wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

FrankWinston wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Next to Madison, Hayfield has the best chance to win the championship of any FCPS this season. Can we get rid of the hate for the next month so the kids can focus on football. These are children we are talking about.

So to you, high school football is more important than finding out the truth, seeing if laws were broken etc. Yikes.

Also, these aren't children we are talking about, most are in their late teens. Don't try and make them more sympathetic figures by framing them in the same lens as a ten year old. Also, most of us are talking about the adults who got the "children" as you call them to lie and possibly break the law and not the "children" themselves, many of whom had to know they were violating rules at a minimum.

Anyone under 18 is still a child. These are kids persuing special interests, growing, and navigating through life.

There is a hot special place for every one of the white supremacists targeting this children and interfering with the Hayfield season because of the color of their skin and their coaches skin.

Yet again, all you can clutch to is false claims of racism because you don't have facts, logic or anything else to cling to. Also, medically speaking, almost none, if any, of those you are pretending to defend are children. The term "child" medically speaking is typically defined a person between birth and the start of puberty. Again, sit this one out.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Genuine question. How come schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley do not have this football cheating issue?

Good question. I think it starts with the adults. Parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley have different priorities, it appears, than their "peers" at Hayfield. For example, parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley seem to deprioritize things like illegal recruiting and winning at all costs and instead prioritize things like teaching the kids under their purview important life lessons. It also seems that parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't feel the need to live vicariously through their children, whereas parents at Hayfield do. So, because of this, at the end of the day, schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't end up cheating at football.

I am guessing that wasn't the answer you were looking for as you picked three very specific schools that might look demographically similar in nature and you were again trying to play the race card, but my answer is correct. Take the L.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Genuine question. How come schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley do not have this football cheating issue?

Good question. I think it starts with the adults. Parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley have different priorities, it appears, than their "peers" at Hayfield. For example, parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley seem to deprioritize things like illegal recruiting and winning at all costs and instead prioritize things like teaching the kids under their purview important life lessons. It also seems that parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't feel the need to live vicariously through their children, whereas parents at Hayfield do. So, because of this, at the end of the day, schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't end up cheating at football.

I am guessing that wasn't the answer you were looking for as you picked three very specific schools that might look demographically similar in nature and you were again trying to play the race card, but my answer is correct. Take the L.

OMG, you can't be serious. Shaking my head.
-signed a McLean parent

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one is rooting for Hayfraud. They shouldn’t even be able to play because of their VHSL violations. No one likes a cheater.

How’d they cheat?

How you so lazy? (Read the thread).

I see nothing but lies and rumors in the thread. Nothing concrete.

Just as the VHSL had nothing concrete. They probably expected to get a white supremacist judge in court that wasn’t going to look at real facts and conclusions of law. They wanted one of those judges that was just going to rule against the Blacks no matter what.

Anonymous wrote:

FrankWinston wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

FrankWinston wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Next to Madison, Hayfield has the best chance to win the championship of any FCPS this season. Can we get rid of the hate for the next month so the kids can focus on football. These are children we are talking about.

So to you, high school football is more important than finding out the truth, seeing if laws were broken etc. Yikes.

Also, these aren't children we are talking about, most are in their late teens. Don't try and make them more sympathetic figures by framing them in the same lens as a ten year old. Also, most of us are talking about the adults who got the "children" as you call them to lie and possibly break the law and not the "children" themselves, many of whom had to know they were violating rules at a minimum.

Anyone under 18 is still a child. These are kids persuing special interests, growing, and navigating through life.

There is a hot special place for every one of the white supremacists targeting this children and interfering with the Hayfield season because of the color of their skin and their coaches skin.

Yet again, all you can clutch to is false claims of racism because you don't have facts, logic or anything else to cling to. Also, medically speaking, almost none, if any, of those you are pretending to defend are children. The term "child" medically speaking is typically defined a person between birth and the start of puberty. Again, sit this one out.

Black's Law Dictionary defines a child as a person under 18 years of age, but your probably right though since your probably white.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Genuine question. How come schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley do not have this football cheating issue?

Good question. I think it starts with the adults. Parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley have different priorities, it appears, than their "peers" at Hayfield. For example, parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley seem to deprioritize things like illegal recruiting and winning at all costs and instead prioritize things like teaching the kids under their purview important life lessons. It also seems that parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't feel the need to live vicariously through their children, whereas parents at Hayfield do. So, because of this, at the end of the day, schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't end up cheating at football.

I am guessing that wasn't the answer you were looking for as you picked three very specific schools that might look demographically similar in nature and you were again trying to play the race card, but my answer is correct. Take the L.

OMG, you can't be serious. Shaking my head.
-signed a McLean parent

FrankWinston wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Next to Madison, Hayfield has the best chance to win the championship of any FCPS this season. Can we get rid of the hate for the next month so the kids can focus on football. These are children we are talking about.

So to you, high school football is more important than finding out the truth, seeing if laws were broken etc. Yikes.

Also, these aren't children we are talking about, most are in their late teens. Don't try and make them more sympathetic figures by framing them in the same lens as a ten year old. Also, most of us are talking about the adults who got the "children" as you call them to lie and possibly break the law and not the "children" themselves, many of whom had to know they were violating rules at a minimum.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Next to Madison, Hayfield has the best chance to win the championship of any FCPS this season. Can we get rid of the hate for the next month so the kids can focus on football. These are children we are talking about.

Nope, we only root for non-cheating teams here in FCPS

Also, what about the 2023 Hayfield players that were summarily booted (or chased) off the team when Overton showed w/his crew from PWC ? Do you care about those children ? And I am some of those had to be black, given the makeup of the school.