Anonymous wrote:Next to Madison, Hayfield has the best chance to win the championship of any FCPS this season. Can we get rid of the hate for the next month so the kids can focus on football. These are children we are talking about.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Next to Madison, Hayfield has the best chance to win the championship of any FCPS this season. Can we get rid of the hate for the next month so the kids can focus on football. These are children we are talking about.

Nope, we only root for non-cheating teams here in FCPS

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Genuine question. How come schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley do not have this football cheating issue?

Good question. I think it starts with the adults. Parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley have different priorities, it appears, than their "peers" at Hayfield. For example, parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley seem to deprioritize things like illegal recruiting and winning at all costs and instead prioritize things like teaching the kids under their purview important life lessons. It also seems that parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't feel the need to live vicariously through their children, whereas parents at Hayfield do. So, because of this, at the end of the day, schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't end up cheating at football.

I am guessing that wasn't the answer you were looking for as you picked three very specific schools that might look demographically similar in nature and you were again trying to play the race card, but my answer is correct. Take the L.

BS. My kid has friends at Langley and I’m familiar with the Langley football roster. All of those kids don’t live within the zoning boundaries and some left private school to play football at Langley.

Langley has even had far worse off field scandals due to the actions of the head football coach and a teacher this year.

Langley has white kids and white coaches so there is no outrage and not even much mention.

They don't have to live within the school zone if they have a valid transfer from FCPS (usually for academic reasons).
Kids are allowed to transfer from privates to their zoned publics for any reason other than sports. I guess these kids and parents were smart enough to keep their mouths shut.

There was no scrutiny or allegations for them to respond to either.

Likely because they didn't do anything wrong.

Yeah, white coaches and white players and their families don’t cheat or do anything wrong.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Genuine question. How come schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley do not have this football cheating issue?

Good question. I think it starts with the adults. Parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley have different priorities, it appears, than their "peers" at Hayfield. For example, parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley seem to deprioritize things like illegal recruiting and winning at all costs and instead prioritize things like teaching the kids under their purview important life lessons. It also seems that parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't feel the need to live vicariously through their children, whereas parents at Hayfield do. So, because of this, at the end of the day, schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't end up cheating at football.

I am guessing that wasn't the answer you were looking for as you picked three very specific schools that might look demographically similar in nature and you were again trying to play the race card, but my answer is correct. Take the L.

BS. My kid has friends at Langley and I’m familiar with the Langley football roster. All of those kids don’t live within the zoning boundaries and some left private school to play football at Langley.

Langley has even had far worse off field scandals due to the actions of the head football coach and a teacher this year.

Langley has white kids and white coaches so there is no outrage and not even much mention.

They don't have to live within the school zone if they have a valid transfer from FCPS (usually for academic reasons).
Kids are allowed to transfer from privates to their zoned publics for any reason other than sports. I guess these kids and parents were smart enough to keep their mouths shut.

There was no scrutiny or allegations for them to respond to either.

Likely because they didn't do anything wrong.

Yeah, white coaches and white players and their families don’t cheat or do anything wrong.

Blah blah blah.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Genuine question. How come schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley do not have this football cheating issue?

Good question. I think it starts with the adults. Parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley have different priorities, it appears, than their "peers" at Hayfield. For example, parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley seem to deprioritize things like illegal recruiting and winning at all costs and instead prioritize things like teaching the kids under their purview important life lessons. It also seems that parents, coaches, administrators at schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't feel the need to live vicariously through their children, whereas parents at Hayfield do. So, because of this, at the end of the day, schools like Oakton, McLean, and Langley don't end up cheating at football.

I am guessing that wasn't the answer you were looking for as you picked three very specific schools that might look demographically similar in nature and you were again trying to play the race card, but my answer is correct. Take the L.

BS. My kid has friends at Langley and I’m familiar with the Langley football roster. All of those kids don’t live within the zoning boundaries and some left private school to play football at Langley.

Langley has even had far worse off field scandals due to the actions of the head football coach and a teacher this year.

Langley has white kids and white coaches so there is no outrage and not even much mention.

They don't have to live within the school zone if they have a valid transfer from FCPS (usually for academic reasons).
Kids are allowed to transfer from privates to their zoned publics for any reason other than sports. I guess these kids and parents were smart enough to keep their mouths shut.

There was no scrutiny or allegations for them to respond to either.

Likely because they didn't do anything wrong.

Yeah, white coaches and white players and their families don’t cheat or do anything wrong.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Next to Madison, Hayfield has the best chance to win the championship of any FCPS this season. Can we get rid of the hate for the next month so the kids can focus on football. These are children we are talking about.

Nope, we only root for non-cheating teams here in FCPS

Also, what about the 2023 Hayfield players that were summarily booted (or chased) off the team when Overton showed w/his crew from PWC ? Do you care about those children ? And I am some of those had to be black, given the makeup of the school.

FrankWinston wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Next to Madison, Hayfield has the best chance to win the championship of any FCPS this season. Can we get rid of the hate for the next month so the kids can focus on football. These are children we are talking about.

So to you, high school football is more important than finding out the truth, seeing if laws were broken etc. Yikes.

Also, these aren't children we are talking about, most are in their late teens. Don't try and make them more sympathetic figures by framing them in the same lens as a ten year old. Also, most of us are talking about the adults who got the "children" as you call them to lie and possibly break the law and not the "children" themselves, many of whom had to know they were violating rules at a minimum.

Anonymous wrote:No one is rooting for Hayfraud. They shouldn’t even be able to play because of their VHSL violations. No one likes a cheater.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one is rooting for Hayfraud. They shouldn’t even be able to play because of their VHSL violations. No one likes a cheater.

How’d they cheat?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That letter is wildly inaccurate. Did she post it online anywhere with open comments?

And why did she only talk to Hayfield stakeholders? ALL FCPS students, teachers, and parents have a stake in this cheating scandal.

it is also on her FB page: https://www.facebook.com/Marcia.FCPS.Franconia

Anonymous wrote:There is more bickering on this forum than on the underground fairfax football thread that has become a civil discussion among football parents ever since the injunction.