Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No child is the social equal of an adult. That is what use of the requisite title reinforces.
This statement bothers me. I think this mentality is what disempowers children from coming forward as victims of abuse and at the same time empowers the abuser to think the kid will not tell.
IMO this is why these situations happen more within the Roman Catholic and Christian Fundamentalist faiths than others, the view that some humans are superior to others. All humans deserve respect.
After attending a very traditional K-8, my DC now attends a progressive high school. I was feeling pretty icky about the addressing teachers by first name policy, but everything else regarding the school's fit to my child was perfect. So I decided to bite the bullet on the first name issue, much the same way I decided to bite the bullet on the "girls can not wear pants" issue at the previous school.
I now feel very differently about the first name policy. I have found at the high school level it has helped create an environment where DC is taking more responsibility for her education. She has learned not to shy away from conflict or accept a situation and/or grade/assignment that does not seem quite right and to respectfully negotiate and stand her ground and to be her own advocate. It is ALWAYS respectful and she also accepts that the educator does have the last word. I credit this to the feeling of openness and mutual respect the first name policy has created at my child's school.
That said, she still addresses adults as Mr. Ms. Mrs until invited to address them by last name. Funny enough, though this is what we have modeled for her since day one, *I* have always preferred children address me by first name. The Ms or Mrs thing always seemed cold to me.