Virginia School Board Proposes Burning Books

BlueFredneck
Member Offline
Anonymous wrote:Burning books is certainly a bad choice of words. We don't want to burn any books in the USA, but limiting what books are available to kids in schools is not unreasonable. Books should be age appropriate, and kids should not be forced or indoctrinated into politically charged ideologies.

However, I would also argue that Big Tech censorship is the modern day equivalent of book burning. It's convenient to claim you are only censoring "misinformation" and "hate speech" - But who gets to determine this? Sometimes Democrats will call a political opinion "hate speech" simply because it is a position held by most white conservatives. Sometimes they will call facts "misinformation" for bizarre reasons. For example, someone posting a personal bad reaction to a vaccine will get hit with a "misinformation" label stating that vaccines are extremely safe. The fact that vaccines are usually safe does not make someone's personal experience "misinformation". The truth is the truth. Of course the Wuhan lab leak theory was called "hate speech" until investigations revealed that it might possibly be true.

I could go on and on, but the point is censorship is bad and prevents us from openly sharing ideas and arriving at the truth.


So checking out books under false pretenses and then burning them allows us to arrive at the truth, how, exactly?
Anonymous
jsteele wrote:Make sure to attend this upcoming book burning event in Fredericksburg:

https://www.facebook.com/events/5126619377351497

Start having your children check out library books from there schools now! (Ones you do NOT want in our schools)At the school board meeting we will have a fire pit in the parking lot. And will burn every last one of them you bring. Yes, at the end of the year, we will have to pay for them. But this year no one will be able to check them out. Feel free to bring marshmallows and a stick.




This should be the footage on every Democratic campaign ad in Virginia in 2022.
Anonymous
If a kid checks out a library book with the intent on their part or their parent's part being to burn it, and then the parent takes or allows the kid to go to an event where the book is actually burned, I kind of hope the student is banned from the school library for an extended period of time. You can't just borrow something - knowing full well you don't intend to return it & in fact want to destroy it - and then pay the same fine that's paid in case of accidental loss or damage, then expect to go right back to being trusted to borrow school property. If that book burning event happens, that's just nuts.
jsteele
Site Admin Online
Anonymous wrote:If a kid checks out a library book with the intent on their part or their parent's part being to burn it, and then the parent takes or allows the kid to go to an event where the book is actually burned, I kind of hope the student is banned from the school library for an extended period of time. You can't just borrow something - knowing full well you don't intend to return it & in fact want to destroy it - and then pay the same fine that's paid in case of accidental loss or damage, then expect to go right back to being trusted to borrow school property. If that book burning event happens, that's just nuts.


I'm no lawyer but wouldn't this be destruction of property and aiding and abetting?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Burning books is certainly a bad choice of words. We don't want to burn any books in the USA, […]

Did you read Jeff’s post? The GOP literally wants to burn books.


So two random school board members in Fredericksburg = "The GOP"? Interesting.
DP
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Burning books is certainly a bad choice of words. We don't want to burn any books in the USA, […]

Did you read Jeff’s post? The GOP literally wants to burn books.


So two random school board members in Fredericksburg = "The GOP"? Interesting.
DP

Which GOP have spoken out against this?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Burning books is certainly a bad choice of words. We don't want to burn any books in the USA, […]

Did you read Jeff’s post? The GOP literally wants to burn books.


So two random school board members in Fredericksburg = "The GOP"? Interesting.
DP

Which GOP have spoken out against this?


Do members of the GOP or Democratic Party generally speak out about comments made by random local school board members?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:That's the GOP for you. The anti-intellectual party. Keep voting for them, women and "concerned moms." This should help your children's education.


+1

Illiterate, hysterical moms.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Burning books is certainly a bad choice of words. We don't want to burn any books in the USA, […]

Did you read Jeff’s post? The GOP literally wants to burn books.


So two random school board members in Fredericksburg = "The GOP"? Interesting.
DP

Which GOP have spoken out against this?


Do members of the GOP or Democratic Party generally speak out about comments made by random local school board members?


Apparently random local school board members got Youngkin elected.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Burning books is certainly a bad choice of words. We don't want to burn any books in the USA, […]

Did you read Jeff’s post? The GOP literally wants to burn books.


So two random school board members in Fredericksburg = "The GOP"? Interesting.
DP

Which GOP have spoken out against this?


Do members of the GOP or Democratic Party generally speak out about comments made by random local school board members?


Apparently random local school board members got Youngkin elected.


Your wild strawmen and gaslighting are getting you nowhere. Other than two school board members in Fredericksburg, no one wants to burn any books. They simply don't want inappropriate sexual content in public school libraries. You can easily pick up all the trash you want your kids to read at any public library. No worries.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Burning books is certainly a bad choice of words. We don't want to burn any books in the USA, […]

Did you read Jeff’s post? The GOP literally wants to burn books.


So two random school board members in Fredericksburg = "The GOP"? Interesting.
DP

Which GOP have spoken out against this?


Do members of the GOP or Democratic Party generally speak out about comments made by random local school board members?

About book burning? Yes, it comes up. I haven’t seen a single maga on this board speak out against it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Kinda reminds me of what’s going on with statues. Instead of ripping and destroying statues, how about having a vote on having them removed. Same thing with these books. Just vote on removal or make them age appropriate. Simple as that. Cmon folks.


+1
But that's common sense. Does not compute here.

I haven’t actually heard a single con speak out against the book burning (or even the banning).

Maybe you should use a smidge more common sense and see if there have been any historical analogues:
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Burning books is certainly a bad choice of words. We don't want to burn any books in the USA, […]

Did you read Jeff’s post? The GOP literally wants to burn books.


So two random school board members in Fredericksburg = "The GOP"? Interesting.
DP

Which GOP have spoken out against this?


Do members of the GOP or Democratic Party generally speak out about comments made by random local school board members?


Apparently random local school board members got Youngkin elected.


Your wild strawmen and gaslighting are getting you nowhere. Other than two school board members in Fredericksburg, no one wants to burn any books. They simply don't want inappropriate sexual content in public school libraries. You can easily pick up all the trash you want your kids to read at any public library. No worries.



Wasn’t that Youngkin’s winning platform? We keep hearing that you all voted for Youngkin because of local school boards.

Make up your mind.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Burning books is certainly a bad choice of words. We don't want to burn any books in the USA, […]

Did you read Jeff’s post? The GOP literally wants to burn books.


So two random school board members in Fredericksburg = "The GOP"? Interesting.
DP

Which GOP have spoken out against this?


Do members of the GOP or Democratic Party generally speak out about comments made by random local school board members?


Apparently random local school board members got Youngkin elected.


Your wild strawmen and gaslighting are getting you nowhere. Other than two school board members in Fredericksburg, no one wants to burn any books. They simply don't want inappropriate sexual content in public school libraries. You can easily pick up all the trash you want your kids to read at any public library. No worries.



Wasn’t that Youngkin’s winning platform? We keep hearing that you all voted for Youngkin because of local school boards.

Make up your mind.


WTH are you talking about? Once again: two random SB members does not mean a majority of people want to “burn books.” Your hyperbole is idiotic.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Burning books is certainly a bad choice of words. We don't want to burn any books in the USA, […]

Did you read Jeff’s post? The GOP literally wants to burn books.


So two random school board members in Fredericksburg = "The GOP"? Interesting.
DP

Which GOP have spoken out against this?


Do members of the GOP or Democratic Party generally speak out about comments made by random local school board members?


Apparently random local school board members got Youngkin elected.


Your wild strawmen and gaslighting are getting you nowhere. Other than two school board members in Fredericksburg, no one wants to burn any books. They simply don't want inappropriate sexual content in public school libraries. You can easily pick up all the trash you want your kids to read at any public library. No worries.



Wasn’t that Youngkin’s winning platform? We keep hearing that you all voted for Youngkin because of local school boards.

Make up your mind.


WTH are you talking about? Once again: two random SB members does not mean a majority of people want to “burn books.” Your hyperbole is idiotic.

Do you condemn book burning?
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: