Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
|
Isn't it very, very weird how, to the best of my knowledge, not one official from the Utah hospital, not one communication director, surgeon or nurse, ever went on record with any reporter? Meanwhile, at the church shooting in Michigan, the hospital had named officials on record immediately.
But according to "Charlie's best friend" an unnamed "surgeon" told him his buddy had "Superman" bones...? "Dr. Michael Danic, the medical chief of staff at Henry Ford Genesys Hospital, provided an update on the victims injured in the Michigan church attack during a press conference on Sept. 29." https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2025/09/29/michigan-church-shooting-press-conference-live-stream/86421353007/ https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/local/2025/09/29/doctor-gives-update-on-victims-injured-in-grand-blanc-township-church-attack/ |
Anonymous
Still waiting to see the bullets from UVU. Also the round recovered from Kirk's neck. Maybe we need a little more time to see if forensics finds a match with the marker ink from Dallas or Michigan. |
Anonymous
Huh? No. -RN and Democrat. Conspiracy theory posts like this used to be for the Qanon pizzagate stuff of the right. Just stop. |
Anonymous
| The only two times there have been very public shootings with no report or disclosure from licensed medical practitioners or medical examiners are the Butler PA shooting and the Charlie Kirk shooting. |
Anonymous
Former journalist here. No editor I know would ever print that “man of steel” bullet-stopping miracle bones crap from an alleged surgeon without naming the surgeon. To me, that is manufactured horseshit, yet it was published by NY Post, Fox News, Daily Mail, and others.
Didn’t name the coroner, either. Two lapses like this wouldn’t make it past a high school kid editing a school paper.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15118967/amp/charlie-kirk-miracle-surgeon-bullet-exit-wound.html |
Anonymous
| I am confused, which surgeon operated on CK? I thought he was DOA or nearly? Only the pathologist should have been retrieving any bullets |
Anonymous
I know this is from way upthread, but I think it's worth reminding people that he said this. I'm sickened by the ruckus this nonsense has caused. He didn't deserve it. I did not deserve to have my social media Feeds and news channels polluted by this nobody and his death. Meanwhile, Nigerian Christians are getting massacred right now by Islamist terrorists and nobody cares. It's not part of the Approved Media Circus. |
Anonymous
Fabrication is the cardinal sin of publishing. Well, it used to be. Clearly not the case anymore. |
Anonymous
Amen! |
Anonymous
It's always better to have someone die as your fairy tale purported martyr than to have them slowly pull away from your ideology and tactics. According to some close to Kirk, he was slowly challenging the overwhelming zionist influence in America and the tactics that were being used. His wife has remained disturbingly quiet in refuting or acknowledging these accusations. |
Anonymous
|
|
Anonymous
Here is the full quote since you leftist morons never take the time to read or listen to the full statement..... “Yeah, it's a great question. Thank you. So, I'm a big Second Amendment fan but I think most politicians are cowards when it comes to defending why we have a Second Amendment. This is why I would not be a good politician, or maybe I would, I don't know, because I actually speak my mind. The Second Amendment is not about hunting. I love hunting. The Second Amendment is not even about personal defense. That is important. The Second Amendment is there, God forbid, so that you can defend yourself against a tyrannical government. And if that talk scares you — "wow, that's radical, Charlie, I don't know about that" — well then, you have not really read any of the literature of our Founding Fathers. Number two, you've not read any 20th-century history. You're just living in Narnia. By the way, if you're actually living in Narnia, you would be wiser than wherever you're living, because C.S. Lewis was really smart. So I don't know what alternative universe you're living in. You just don't want to face reality that governments tend to get tyrannical and that if people need an ability to protect themselves and their communities and their families. Now, we must also be real. We must be honest with the population. Having an armed citizenry comes with a price, and that is part of liberty. Driving comes with a price. 50,000, 50,000, 50,000 people die on the road every year. That's a price. You get rid of driving, you'd have 50,000 less auto fatalities. But we have decided that the benefit of driving — speed, accessibility, mobility, having products, services — is worth the cost of 50,000 people dying on the road. So we need to be very clear that you're not going to get gun deaths to zero. It will not happen. You could significantly reduce them through having more fathers in the home, by having more armed guards in front of schools. We should have a honest and clear reductionist view of gun violence, but we should not have a utopian one. You will never live in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won't have a single gun death. That is nonsense. It's drivel. But I am, I, I — I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational. Nobody talks like this. They live in a complete alternate universe. So then, how do you reduce? Very simple. People say, oh, Charlie, how do you stop school shootings? I don't know. How did we stop shootings at baseball games? Because we have armed guards outside of baseball games. That's why. How did we stop all the shootings at airports? We have armed guards outside of airports. How do we stop all the shootings at banks? We have armed guards outside of banks. How did we stop all the shootings at gun shows? Notice there's not a lot of mass shootings at gun shows, there's all these guns. Because everyone's armed. If our money and our sporting events and our airplanes have armed guards, why don't our children?” |
Anonymous
I agree the quote is manufactured and probably embellishment from whatever a surgeon told the family. But to expect a nurse, doctor, surgeon, etc to go on the record is ridiculous. I work for a major trauma center and everyone is expected to direct media to the hospital PR person; even then, the PR person can only say what the family permits due to privacy laws. Otherwise, you lose your job. |
Anonymous
PS, agree he probably did not make it to surgery but the hospital still likely had a trauma surgeon assess him on arrival. |