'21-22' DMV LACROSSE OUTLOOK

[Anonymous]

And I’m not so sure that most of those commits (other than the goalie) play much at the next level. None are really physically imposing and seem to be on the smaller side. Not much of a problem in HS but will be in college.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SJC
They max out their 12 hours a week every week.
Four 3 hour practices a week since September 1.

You quite literally have no clue. That is not their schedule.

[Anonymous]

Agree—SJC is a great team because they play well together and are well coached. Sum is greater than the parts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Getting a little carried away dad…SJC is no way near the undefeated Landon 2017. That team had multiple players who attended top ranked D1 schools and are contributing now that they are in college. SJC has a number of really good players who play well together as a team. But other than the goalie, there is not one player who could be considered a 5 star. Landon had multiple 5 stars including the fogo who went something close to 80% and Epstein who may have been National POY. If SJC goes undefeated this year I may change my tune, but the fact remains there is a huge talent disparity between the two teams that you are comparing.

This is a lot of coping. The attack will play a lot in college and the 24 is unbelievable. The Lehigh pole will definitely play. Has best stick in country. The SSDM will play right away for Cuse. I’m not sure what will stop the Cuse pole from playing. The new Fogo will also play a lot in college too. I don’t see the Cuse middie playing but he can score anywhere with both hands. Could see him transferring and tearing it up somewhere else.

[Anonymous]

A lot of projection, dad. I hope they all play in college but the fact of the matter is that only the goalie looks like a 5 star, the rest you mentioned are good players but most undersized.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A lot of projection, dad. I hope they all play in college but the fact of the matter is that only the goalie looks like a 5 star, the rest you mentioned are good players but most undersized.

Alrighty coach. Guess all the college coaches that called and offered are totally wrong. They should have reached out to you to get your views. Lol You know they do not recruit based off of what IL rankings right? We shall see if these so called “undersized” players aren’t on the field.

[Anonymous]

Is it correct that many of the SJC seniors started their freshman year?

[Anonymous]

67 pages of shit talking. Is this a record?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:67 pages of shit talking. Is this a record?

You made it. 🤔

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A lot of projection, dad. I hope they all play in college but the fact of the matter is that only the goalie looks like a 5 star, the rest you mentioned are good players but most undersized.

Alrighty coach. Guess all the college coaches that called and offered are totally wrong. They should have reached out to you to get your views. Lol You know they do not recruit based off of what IL rankings right? We shall see if these so called “undersized” players aren’t on the field.

I think there is a major disconnect between IL projections and what college coaches see. I trust college coaches' opinions a heck of a lot more than beat lax writers writing for Inside Lacrosse. College coaches are making bets on kids athletic and mental ability over a 5 - 6 year period. Some of the kids they recruit are complete busts, some are average, and some kids they land are total surprises (Pat Spencer ring a bell)

The reality is, some of the kids who you often hear about in the top 25 IL rankings for their respectful class year, make an impact in college, and some hardly even see the field, and some don't even make it past a year or two of playing.

My son graduated from an IAC school, he was not a blue-chip rate recruit out of HS. He worked his tail off and managed to play big-time minutes as a junior and senior. Ironically, some of the kids, who was highly touted coming out of his HS and rival schools in the area, didn't even play after their sophomore season.

[Anonymous]

Several factors at play outside of players abilities with IL too.

One glaring factor is if dad is dropping some serious money to Ty he will give you a bump. 👀. Poor kid will be exposed in college.

[Anonymous]

IL only ranked the top 10 players in the 2022 class so we really don’t know where they feel the players stand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is it correct that many of the SJC seniors started their freshman year?

Old Fogo
Spalding Transfer Fail
Cuse Mid
Cuse SSDM
Cuse D
Lehigh D

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it correct that many of the SJC seniors started their freshman year?

Old Fogo
Spalding Transfer Fail
Cuse Mid
Cuse SSDM
Cuse D
Lehigh D

More like (22 Staters at Championship freshman year)

AF Fogo
Drexel attack
Syracuse D
Navy attack
Syracuse M

Others played a ton but weren’t starters

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Getting a little carried away dad…SJC is no way near the undefeated Landon 2017. That team had multiple players who attended top ranked D1 schools and are contributing now that they are in college. SJC has a number of really good players who play well together as a team. But other than the goalie, there is not one player who could be considered a 5 star. Landon had multiple 5 stars including the fogo who went something close to 80% and Epstein who may have been National POY. If SJC goes undefeated this year I may change my tune, but the fact remains there is a huge talent disparity between the two teams that you are comparing.

Landon had a tougher schedule that year, but this SJC team is just as stacked and has a chance to do something special this year.