Labor Sec. Acosta accused of helping Jeffrey Epstein beat sex trafficking charges

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:this is really gross

https://twitter.com/TheRealHolli/status/1149046964715057152

Though apparently this lawsuit was withdrawn - and who knows if the claims are legitimate

https://www.vox.com/2019/7/9/20686347/jeffrey-epstein-trump-bill-clinton

Clinton has not been accused of any specific sexual misconduct connected to Epstein. As for Trump: During the 2016 campaign, Trump was sued by an anonymous woman who claimed he raped her at an Epstein party when she was 13 years old. However, several journalists who dug into this allegation back then came away voicing caution or downright skepticism, and the accuser withdrew her lawsuit shortly before the election.

So there hasn’t yet been corroboration of Epstein-related wrongdoing on Trump’s part by media outlets, or any accusation against Clinton at all. But the question of whether other influential figures will be implicated in Epstein’s crimes remains an open one. Julie Brown, a Miami Herald investigative reporter who has covered Epstein’s case intensively, said on MSNBC Sunday that “there are probably quite a few important people, powerful people, who are sweating it out right now.”

I tend to believe the women! Who knows who's threatening whom?

I am all about conspiracy, and we'll go one way or the other - full out confessions that are mind-blowing or all swept back under the rug. I am leaning toward the latter.

When the FBI raided his NY house, didn't they find a bunch of labelled tapes with names in his safe? Young "name" + "name" Assuming that's also not conveniently lost.

When they searched his place in FL when he was first caught, they found empty safes. The states attorney wouldn't have gotten a warrant to search any of his other locations, but the feds (Acosta) certainly could have gotten a warrant for his Manhattan residency, NM residency, and Virgin Island location at the same time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Date this videotaped interview aired: Nov. 4, 2016. Days before the 2016 election.
Not curious at all, is it?

It was the end of an incredibly strange case that featured an anonymous plaintiff who had refused almost all requests for interviews, two anonymous corroborating witnesses whom no one in the press had spoken to, and a couple of seriously shady characters — with an anti-Trump agenda and a penchant for drama — who had aggressively shopped the story around to media outlets for over a year.

Those shady characters — a former reality TV producer who calls himself “Al Taylor” and a “Never Trump” conservative activist named Steve Baer — had been mostly unsuccessful in getting the media to bite. There are a few very good reasons for that, which the Huffington Post’s Ryan Grim succinctly summed up: Taylor and Baer have been really sketchy about the whole thing, and since the accuser is anonymous, journalists can’t do anything to verify her claims. The only journalist who has actually interviewed Johnson, Emily Shugerman at Revelist, came away confused and even doubting whether Johnson really exists.

The lawsuit Johnson filed in New York was actually her second attempt to sue Trump and Epstein. The first was in California in April of this year, a claim Johnson filed herself that got thrown out on technical grounds — she’d filed a civil rights suit, but failed to actually state an applicable civil rights claim.

There were a couple of odd things about that lawsuit. The address listed on court documents as Johnson’s was actually a foreclosed, abandoned home, and the phone number was disconnected. Maybe Johnson was just using a fake address because she was homeless; she was, after all, also described as being indigent. But it’s fishy.

The lawsuit also described details that were so lurid — “almost cinematic in their depravity,” as Jezebel’s Anna Merlan put it — that they’re almost hard to believe. Some of those details were omitted from the second lawsuit, the New York Daily News reported:

Gone from the new lawsuit is an allegation that Trump threw money at the plaintiff for an abortion when she expressed fear about getting pregnant after being raped. Gone, too, is the allegation that Trump called co-defendant and accused pedophile and sex party host Jeffrey Epstein a “Jew bastard,” and her request for $100 million in damages.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/policy-and-politics/2016/11/3/13501364/trump-rape-13-year-old-lawsuit-katie-johnson-allegation

No it’s completely believable.

Thank you for posting this. The woman is a loon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Date this videotaped interview aired: Nov. 4, 2016. Days before the 2016 election.
Not curious at all, is it?

It was the end of an incredibly strange case that featured an anonymous plaintiff who had refused almost all requests for interviews, two anonymous corroborating witnesses whom no one in the press had spoken to, and a couple of seriously shady characters — with an anti-Trump agenda and a penchant for drama — who had aggressively shopped the story around to media outlets for over a year.

Those shady characters — a former reality TV producer who calls himself “Al Taylor” and a “Never Trump” conservative activist named Steve Baer — had been mostly unsuccessful in getting the media to bite. There are a few very good reasons for that, which the Huffington Post’s Ryan Grim succinctly summed up: Taylor and Baer have been really sketchy about the whole thing, and since the accuser is anonymous, journalists can’t do anything to verify her claims. The only journalist who has actually interviewed Johnson, Emily Shugerman at Revelist, came away confused and even doubting whether Johnson really exists.

The lawsuit Johnson filed in New York was actually her second attempt to sue Trump and Epstein. The first was in California in April of this year, a claim Johnson filed herself that got thrown out on technical grounds — she’d filed a civil rights suit, but failed to actually state an applicable civil rights claim.

There were a couple of odd things about that lawsuit. The address listed on court documents as Johnson’s was actually a foreclosed, abandoned home, and the phone number was disconnected. Maybe Johnson was just using a fake address because she was homeless; she was, after all, also described as being indigent. But it’s fishy.

The lawsuit also described details that were so lurid — “almost cinematic in their depravity,” as Jezebel’s Anna Merlan put it — that they’re almost hard to believe. Some of those details were omitted from the second lawsuit, the New York Daily News reported:

Gone from the new lawsuit is an allegation that Trump threw money at the plaintiff for an abortion when she expressed fear about getting pregnant after being raped. Gone, too, is the allegation that Trump called co-defendant and accused pedophile and sex party host Jeffrey Epstein a “Jew bastard,” and her request for $100 million in damages.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/policy-and-politics/2016/11/3/13501364/trump-rape-13-year-old-lawsuit-katie-johnson-allegation

No it’s completely believable.

Thank you for posting this. The woman is a loon.

You are welcome. Whatever people want to believe is what they will believe, but the Trump raping the 13 year old girl story is based on garbage and sensationalism that Vox can’t even choke down.

[Anonymous]

“Jezebel previously detailed the bizarre backstory behind two lawsuits Johnson filed against Trump and celebrity sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who she said also raped her at a party in 1994. A group of men worked for a year to push the rape allegations into the news, while preventing access to Johnson. No journalist has ever been able to speak to her directly in person or confirm her existence.”

Oh ok.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/theslot.jezebel.com/the-woman-who-accused-trump-of-raping-her-at-13-just-dr-1788603598/amp

[Anonymous]

I agree the Katie Johnson rape accusation story is pretty weak. Maybe if other women come forward to openly accuse him of rape and sexual misconduct I could believe Trump really was a skeevy perv. Oh wait...

[Anonymous]

Trump Rape Accusers Turn On Each Other

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-rape-accusers-turn-on-each-other

“The accuser—who used the name Katie Johnson to file a lawsuit in Manhattan Federal Court—alleges the Republican presidential nominee raped her in the summer of 1994, when she was 13, while attending a sex party at the New York City mansion of notorious pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein. The claim was basically a repeat of her earlier lawsuit, filed in California in May without legal representation, which was dismissed on procedural grounds for failing to make a claim under an applicable statute.”

So far, so good. Sort of.


“This time around, Johnson had a team of supporters behind her—a motley crew that included anti-abortion conservative donor Steve Baer and a man who calls himself “Al Taylor,” a mysterious foul-mouthed ex-producer of The Jerry Springer Show, the two unified by one common passion: a blinding hatred for Donald Trump.

For a time, it seemed like a perfect marriage between a #NeverTrump Republican with money to spend and a penniless woman and her handler who allegedly had the ammunition to sink the Republican nominee.”

Jerry Springer producer? SIGN ME UP!


“Baer and Taylor, both eccentric in their own right, have turned on each other in a war of escalating all-caps emails. Baer now claims he is withholding additional financial support for Johnson. He and Taylor are threatening to sue one another. And Baer’s antics—which include delivering an unpixelated tape, of a woman he claims to be Katie Johnson, to GOP presidential hopefuls and House Speaker Paul Ryan—allegedly brought the FBI and the police to his door.“

Financial support withdrawn? Shits about to get real up in here.

“Taylor says he met Katie Johnson a few years ago at a party, where she allegedly told him that she had been raped as a teen by Trump. (The Guardian has convincingly reported that “Taylor” is actually a publicity-loving conspiracy peddler named Norm Lubow, a theory that Taylor has fervently denied: “AL TAYLOR, BORN AL TAYLOR, ALWAYS BEEN AL TAYLOR AND ALWAYS WILL BE AL TAYLOR,” he signed a recent email.)“

So the Guardian found out the guy was using a fake name/persona? Excellent!

“In February 2016, when it seemed possible that Trump could clinch the GOP nomination, Johnson, with Taylor’s help, decided to make what Taylor called a “murder insurance” video where she—disguised in a wig–would offer details of her alleged attack. They hired a videographer, Jonathann Launer, and agreed to pay him with a 20 percent stake in whatever money the tape might bring in from tabloids willing to purchase it.“

Bingo! Get that paper whoever you all are!

“Despite numerous attempts to meet with Katie Johnson—and repeated promises from Meagher to produce her for an interview—The Daily Beast has never spoken with Trump’s accuser.”

Nice try, Daily Beast. We know you are actually not reporters but MURDERERS! Good thing there’s the murder insurance YouTube video. Amateurs.

“Though Baer says he has never actually seen Katie Johnson, he claims he has spoken to her on the phone and watched her 48-minute video. And with sworn affidavits and a pending federal case, Bear viewed Johnson’s allegations against Trump as a “slam dunk.”

“I believe her,” Baer told The Daily Beast.”

Ok, who has seen Katie Johnson? Anyone?

So on May 20, Baer says, he wired $19,000 to California.

A portion of that money, $13,000, was sent to Taylor, ostensibly for Johnson, to cover a move to her own apartment, where only Taylor would know her whereabouts. “Well, that’s what I was told,” Baer said, “They could have gone and partied.”

“The remaining cash was sent to Jonathann Launer, in exchange for his stake in the video’s potential earnings. (Launer did not return a request for comment, but both Taylor and Baer confirmed this account.) Meanwhile, Taylor was shopping the video of Johnson to outlets like Gawker, with a suggested price tag of $1 million, and a promise to spend any funds on Johnson’s protection—to keep her safe from Trump and Epstein, whom Taylor contends will have her killed if they can find her. As of this writing, no one has purchased it.“

Totally aboveboard. Honest. Believable.

“Baer also maintains the website JusticeforKatie.org, a repository for documents related to Johnson’s case and a place to donate to the Justice for Katie Legal Fund and Trust. “Armed personal security, private detectives, researchers, transport, safe housing, lawyers, polygraph experts and paralegals are needed now,” the website claims. Baer says that so far, he has been the only contributor to the trust, which technically owns Launer’s share of Johnson’s video, and that the fund holds $4.50.“

I cant even pretend this is real anymore. It’s bizzare.

“Several of the clips from that video, with Katie’s face pixelated, are available online, posted by one “Bianca Manix.” A person using the same name has posted the videos along with a “Trump Victims Unite” Facebook page, to other anti-Trump Facebook pages. And a Twitter account belonging to Bianca Manix has six tweets.”

Uhhhhhh thank you Daily Beast, for that magical ride into an episode of whatever the hell that is, but sure isn’t anything that democrats will read and understand that their “Trump raped a 13 year old” hysteria is based on grifters, lies, an invisible victim, and a YouTube video shopped around for $100k.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I agree the Katie Johnson rape accusation story is pretty weak. Maybe if other women come forward to openly accuse him of rape and sexual misconduct I could believe Trump really was a skeevy perv. Oh wait...

1,000,000 women could say Trump raped them. They could cry, and get legal representation, and give interviews. But unless they have evidently, it’s just a claim.

If I came to your house and said your husband raped me, would you call the police on him and get a divorce lawyer immediately?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump Rape Accusers Turn On Each Other

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-rape-accusers-turn-on-each-other

“The accuser—who used the name Katie Johnson to file a lawsuit in Manhattan Federal Court—alleges the Republican presidential nominee raped her in the summer of 1994, when she was 13, while attending a sex party at the New York City mansion of notorious pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein. The claim was basically a repeat of her earlier lawsuit, filed in California in May without legal representation, which was dismissed on procedural grounds for failing to make a claim under an applicable statute.”

So far, so good. Sort of.


“This time around, Johnson had a team of supporters behind her—a motley crew that included anti-abortion conservative donor Steve Baer and a man who calls himself “Al Taylor,” a mysterious foul-mouthed ex-producer of The Jerry Springer Show, the two unified by one common passion: a blinding hatred for Donald Trump.

For a time, it seemed like a perfect marriage between a #NeverTrump Republican with money to spend and a penniless woman and her handler who allegedly had the ammunition to sink the Republican nominee.”

Jerry Springer producer? SIGN ME UP!


“Baer and Taylor, both eccentric in their own right, have turned on each other in a war of escalating all-caps emails. Baer now claims he is withholding additional financial support for Johnson. He and Taylor are threatening to sue one another. And Baer’s antics—which include delivering an unpixelated tape, of a woman he claims to be Katie Johnson, to GOP presidential hopefuls and House Speaker Paul Ryan—allegedly brought the FBI and the police to his door.“

Financial support withdrawn? Shits about to get real up in here.

“Taylor says he met Katie Johnson a few years ago at a party, where she allegedly told him that she had been raped as a teen by Trump. (The Guardian has convincingly reported that “Taylor” is actually a publicity-loving conspiracy peddler named Norm Lubow, a theory that Taylor has fervently denied: “AL TAYLOR, BORN AL TAYLOR, ALWAYS BEEN AL TAYLOR AND ALWAYS WILL BE AL TAYLOR,” he signed a recent email.)“

So the Guardian found out the guy was using a fake name/persona? Excellent!

“In February 2016, when it seemed possible that Trump could clinch the GOP nomination, Johnson, with Taylor’s help, decided to make what Taylor called a “murder insurance” video where she—disguised in a wig–would offer details of her alleged attack. They hired a videographer, Jonathann Launer, and agreed to pay him with a 20 percent stake in whatever money the tape might bring in from tabloids willing to purchase it.“

Bingo! Get that paper whoever you all are!

“Despite numerous attempts to meet with Katie Johnson—and repeated promises from Meagher to produce her for an interview—The Daily Beast has never spoken with Trump’s accuser.”

Nice try, Daily Beast. We know you are actually not reporters but MURDERERS! Good thing there’s the murder insurance YouTube video. Amateurs.

“Though Baer says he has never actually seen Katie Johnson, he claims he has spoken to her on the phone and watched her 48-minute video. And with sworn affidavits and a pending federal case, Bear viewed Johnson’s allegations against Trump as a “slam dunk.”

“I believe her,” Baer told The Daily Beast.”

Ok, who has seen Katie Johnson? Anyone?

So on May 20, Baer says, he wired $19,000 to California.

A portion of that money, $13,000, was sent to Taylor, ostensibly for Johnson, to cover a move to her own apartment, where only Taylor would know her whereabouts. “Well, that’s what I was told,” Baer said, “They could have gone and partied.”

“The remaining cash was sent to Jonathann Launer, in exchange for his stake in the video’s potential earnings. (Launer did not return a request for comment, but both Taylor and Baer confirmed this account.) Meanwhile, Taylor was shopping the video of Johnson to outlets like Gawker, with a suggested price tag of $1 million, and a promise to spend any funds on Johnson’s protection—to keep her safe from Trump and Epstein, whom Taylor contends will have her killed if they can find her. As of this writing, no one has purchased it.“

Totally aboveboard. Honest. Believable.

“Baer also maintains the website JusticeforKatie.org, a repository for documents related to Johnson’s case and a place to donate to the Justice for Katie Legal Fund and Trust. “Armed personal security, private detectives, researchers, transport, safe housing, lawyers, polygraph experts and paralegals are needed now,” the website claims. Baer says that so far, he has been the only contributor to the trust, which technically owns Launer’s share of Johnson’s video, and that the fund holds $4.50.“

I cant even pretend this is real anymore. It’s bizzare.

“Several of the clips from that video, with Katie’s face pixelated, are available online, posted by one “Bianca Manix.” A person using the same name has posted the videos along with a “Trump Victims Unite” Facebook page, to other anti-Trump Facebook pages. And a Twitter account belonging to Bianca Manix has six tweets.”

Uhhhhhh thank you Daily Beast, for that magical ride into an episode of whatever the hell that is, but sure isn’t anything that democrats will read and understand that their “Trump raped a 13 year old” hysteria is based on grifters, lies, an invisible victim, and a YouTube video shopped around for $100k.

People in Trump's orbit - whether pro-Trump or anti-Trump - are grifters. Shocking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump Rape Accusers Turn On Each Other

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-rape-accusers-turn-on-each-other

“The accuser—who used the name Katie Johnson to file a lawsuit in Manhattan Federal Court—alleges the Republican presidential nominee raped her in the summer of 1994, when she was 13, while attending a sex party at the New York City mansion of notorious pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein. The claim was basically a repeat of her earlier lawsuit, filed in California in May without legal representation, which was dismissed on procedural grounds for failing to make a claim under an applicable statute.”

So far, so good. Sort of.


“This time around, Johnson had a team of supporters behind her—a motley crew that included anti-abortion conservative donor Steve Baer and a man who calls himself “Al Taylor,” a mysterious foul-mouthed ex-producer of The Jerry Springer Show, the two unified by one common passion: a blinding hatred for Donald Trump.

For a time, it seemed like a perfect marriage between a #NeverTrump Republican with money to spend and a penniless woman and her handler who allegedly had the ammunition to sink the Republican nominee.”

Jerry Springer producer? SIGN ME UP!


“Baer and Taylor, both eccentric in their own right, have turned on each other in a war of escalating all-caps emails. Baer now claims he is withholding additional financial support for Johnson. He and Taylor are threatening to sue one another. And Baer’s antics—which include delivering an unpixelated tape, of a woman he claims to be Katie Johnson, to GOP presidential hopefuls and House Speaker Paul Ryan—allegedly brought the FBI and the police to his door.“

Financial support withdrawn? Shits about to get real up in here.

“Taylor says he met Katie Johnson a few years ago at a party, where she allegedly told him that she had been raped as a teen by Trump. (The Guardian has convincingly reported that “Taylor” is actually a publicity-loving conspiracy peddler named Norm Lubow, a theory that Taylor has fervently denied: “AL TAYLOR, BORN AL TAYLOR, ALWAYS BEEN AL TAYLOR AND ALWAYS WILL BE AL TAYLOR,” he signed a recent email.)“

So the Guardian found out the guy was using a fake name/persona? Excellent!

“In February 2016, when it seemed possible that Trump could clinch the GOP nomination, Johnson, with Taylor’s help, decided to make what Taylor called a “murder insurance” video where she—disguised in a wig–would offer details of her alleged attack. They hired a videographer, Jonathann Launer, and agreed to pay him with a 20 percent stake in whatever money the tape might bring in from tabloids willing to purchase it.“

Bingo! Get that paper whoever you all are!

“Despite numerous attempts to meet with Katie Johnson—and repeated promises from Meagher to produce her for an interview—The Daily Beast has never spoken with Trump’s accuser.”

Nice try, Daily Beast. We know you are actually not reporters but MURDERERS! Good thing there’s the murder insurance YouTube video. Amateurs.

“Though Baer says he has never actually seen Katie Johnson, he claims he has spoken to her on the phone and watched her 48-minute video. And with sworn affidavits and a pending federal case, Bear viewed Johnson’s allegations against Trump as a “slam dunk.”

“I believe her,” Baer told The Daily Beast.”

Ok, who has seen Katie Johnson? Anyone?

So on May 20, Baer says, he wired $19,000 to California.

A portion of that money, $13,000, was sent to Taylor, ostensibly for Johnson, to cover a move to her own apartment, where only Taylor would know her whereabouts. “Well, that’s what I was told,” Baer said, “They could have gone and partied.”

“The remaining cash was sent to Jonathann Launer, in exchange for his stake in the video’s potential earnings. (Launer did not return a request for comment, but both Taylor and Baer confirmed this account.) Meanwhile, Taylor was shopping the video of Johnson to outlets like Gawker, with a suggested price tag of $1 million, and a promise to spend any funds on Johnson’s protection—to keep her safe from Trump and Epstein, whom Taylor contends will have her killed if they can find her. As of this writing, no one has purchased it.“

Totally aboveboard. Honest. Believable.

“Baer also maintains the website JusticeforKatie.org, a repository for documents related to Johnson’s case and a place to donate to the Justice for Katie Legal Fund and Trust. “Armed personal security, private detectives, researchers, transport, safe housing, lawyers, polygraph experts and paralegals are needed now,” the website claims. Baer says that so far, he has been the only contributor to the trust, which technically owns Launer’s share of Johnson’s video, and that the fund holds $4.50.“

I cant even pretend this is real anymore. It’s bizzare.

“Several of the clips from that video, with Katie’s face pixelated, are available online, posted by one “Bianca Manix.” A person using the same name has posted the videos along with a “Trump Victims Unite” Facebook page, to other anti-Trump Facebook pages. And a Twitter account belonging to Bianca Manix has six tweets.”

Uhhhhhh thank you Daily Beast, for that magical ride into an episode of whatever the hell that is, but sure isn’t anything that democrats will read and understand that their “Trump raped a 13 year old” hysteria is based on grifters, lies, an invisible victim, and a YouTube video shopped around for $100k.

People in Trump's orbit - whether pro-Trump or anti-Trump - are grifters. Shocking.

These people are in Trump’s orbit? No journalist has ever met much less interviewed “Katie Johnson.” Yet liberals and dcum are howling Trump raped her. You people are buffoons, dolts, fools, and sheep.

[Anonymous]

OMG. What a sh#tshow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OMG. What a sh#tshow.

Vox and Daily Beast have even detailed the sh#tshow that is the Katie Johnson rape claim, yet people post “Trump is a pedo that raped a 13 year old girl.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree the Katie Johnson rape accusation story is pretty weak. Maybe if other women come forward to openly accuse him of rape and sexual misconduct I could believe Trump really was a skeevy perv. Oh wait...

1,000,000 women could say Trump raped them. They could cry, and get legal representation, and give interviews. But unless they have evidently, it’s just a claim.

If I came to your house and said your husband raped me, would you call the police on him and get a divorce lawyer immediately?

If 24 women came to your house and said your husband raped them, I should think at some point it would dawn on you that you’re married to a predator.

Donald bragged about sexually assaulting women. Your ongoing defense of a pervert and dirtbag is so gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree the Katie Johnson rape accusation story is pretty weak. Maybe if other women come forward to openly accuse him of rape and sexual misconduct I could believe Trump really was a skeevy perv. Oh wait...

1,000,000 women could say Trump raped them. They could cry, and get legal representation, and give interviews. But unless they have evidently, it’s just a claim.

If I came to your house and said your husband raped me, would you call the police on him and get a divorce lawyer immediately?

If 24 women came to me and said my DH assaulted them, I might look into it. Depends on how much money DH gives me, I guess. /s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree the Katie Johnson rape accusation story is pretty weak. Maybe if other women come forward to openly accuse him of rape and sexual misconduct I could believe Trump really was a skeevy perv. Oh wait...

1,000,000 women could say Trump raped them. They could cry, and get legal representation, and give interviews. But unless they have evidently, it’s just a claim.

If I came to your house and said your husband raped me, would you call the police on him and get a divorce lawyer immediately?

And, how many of these claims, which are eventually proven totally bogus, will the left believe before they see that this is more of the "boy who cried wolf" syndrome?
There is a pattern here, alright. Salacious claim (with similar details that the left has been promoting) ----> Outrage on the left -------> Claim proved false ---------> The left ignores the facts

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG. What a sh#tshow.

Vox and Daily Beast have even detailed the sh#tshow that is the Katie Johnson rape claim, yet people post “Trump is a pedo that raped a 13 year old girl.”

I think it is possible, even probable, that the Johnson claim is largely bogus AND that Trump is a skeevy dude who assaults women.