As a Democrat, it all feels hopeless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I had to stop watching the news after Trump getting shot. Republicans are basically saying any criticism of Trump is an incitement of violence. Republicans are just revolting. I’m truly disgusted by all their bad faith arguments. I need to stop reading the posts here. The GOP is revolting.

He almost died. Criticize him all you want for valid reasons, but the violent rhetoric that caused us to be an inch away from a civil war by fear-mongering about how our country will die if he gets elected—needs to stop.

This was the first time ever, since the SS created their counter sniper team—that any SS sniper needed to fire their rifle to neutralize a threat.

And it was to protect Trump, and yall just can’t stand that given the moral high ground narrative you’ve created around Democrats.

It’s really, incredibly sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just can’t imagine why women would vote against their own interests after it took decades to win some of their rights.

But you know what? Let them.

The only way these kind of people learn their lessons is by living the consequences of their actions.

So let them be in the kitchen instead of office, always popping babies and be financially dependent on husbands, unable to get a divorce or support themselves, uneducated, while the men make money and keep a mistress or two around. Pathetic fools.

We pay for the consequences of our choices by the way we live.

Oh no, women will be kept out of the office! What a tragic situation. The office is the most magical and beautiful place anyone could ever be. (Wonder why no fed employees want to go back to the office, absolute mystery innit?)

Yes. Having your own bank account and having control over your body and where you live and how you spend your days is magical.

Then how do you explain Republicans appointing first black lieutenant governor in Virginia?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You guys get it now? Trump will be 47, unless you kill him. Which is possible.

What a disgusting thing to say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just can’t imagine why women would vote against their own interests after it took decades to win some of their rights.

But you know what? Let them.

The only way these kind of people learn their lessons is by living the consequences of their actions.

So let them be in the kitchen instead of office, always popping babies and be financially dependent on husbands, unable to get a divorce or support themselves, uneducated, while the men make money and keep a mistress or two around. Pathetic fools.

We pay for the consequences of our choices by the way we live.

+ millions
It is baffling. It’s equally incomprehensible that anyone who is not a rich white heterosexual man thinks that project 2025 and maga will work out well for them.

There will be no union protection, no Medicare, social security or Medicaid. Rural white Americans on federal disability insurance are sure going to be surprised when they find out what it’s like to live without government assistance.

They will be ok, they survived in 2016-2020, I am pretty sure they can make another four years. But if you are truly care about them, you can donate all your money to those communities directly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just can’t imagine why women would vote against their own interests after it took decades to win some of their rights.

But you know what? Let them.

The only way these kind of people learn their lessons is by living the consequences of their actions.

So let them be in the kitchen instead of office, always popping babies and be financially dependent on husbands, unable to get a divorce or support themselves, uneducated, while the men make money and keep a mistress or two around. Pathetic fools.

We pay for the consequences of our choices by the way we live.

Maybe because republicans are fighting for women’s rights.

I will stick with the party who isn’t delusional enough to think men are women and push women out of female spaces for a biological man. I will stick with the party who wants to protect women from getting their chances stolen by boys who think they’re women.

[Anonymous]

Here’s a thought still. You all can still leave like you lied and said you would back in 2016. I guess we will call your bluff again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just can’t imagine why women would vote against their own interests after it took decades to win some of their rights.

But you know what? Let them.

The only way these kind of people learn their lessons is by living the consequences of their actions.

So let them be in the kitchen instead of office, always popping babies and be financially dependent on husbands, unable to get a divorce or support themselves, uneducated, while the men make money and keep a mistress or two around. Pathetic fools.

We pay for the consequences of our choices by the way we live.

Lots of husbands screwing around on their feminists wives all of the time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just can’t imagine why women would vote against their own interests after it took decades to win some of their rights.

But you know what? Let them.

The only way these kind of people learn their lessons is by living the consequences of their actions.

So let them be in the kitchen instead of office, always popping babies and be financially dependent on husbands, unable to get a divorce or support themselves, uneducated, while the men make money and keep a mistress or two around. Pathetic fools.

We pay for the consequences of our choices by the way we live.

No one wants to repeal a woman’s right to work and get an education. Keep pushing your false little agenda. Your husband is probably screwing around on you anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just can’t imagine why women would vote against their own interests after it took decades to win some of their rights.

But you know what? Let them.

The only way these kind of people learn their lessons is by living the consequences of their actions.

So let them be in the kitchen instead of office, always popping babies and be financially dependent on husbands, unable to get a divorce or support themselves, uneducated, while the men make money and keep a mistress or two around. Pathetic fools.

We pay for the consequences of our choices by the way we live.

Oh no, women will be kept out of the office! What a tragic situation. The office is the most magical and beautiful place anyone could ever be. (Wonder why no fed employees want to go back to the office, absolute mystery innit?)

Yes. Having your own bank account and having control over your body and where you live and how you spend your days is magical.

Then how do you explain Republicans appointing first black lieutenant governor in Virginia?

They’ll appoint a woman who made a patriarchal bargain, who promote the patriarchy. These women do it for small p power. Better to save themselves than all women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

They tried to send him to prison

He(they) tried to un-alive him and he survived by a miracle or luck.

1. What do you mean “tried” to send him? A jury of peers found him guilty in the court of law. There is a rule of law and legal process in this country.

2. I’m pretty sure if the wanted to kill him, the would not send a 20 year old who was rejected from a school shooting club.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Oh no, women will be kept out of the office! What a tragic situation. The office is the most magical and beautiful place anyone could ever be. (Wonder why no fed employees want to go back to the office, absolute mystery innit?)

It’s a metaphor. Another metaphor is when men were sending rockets into space, women were making them coffee.

A career makes you financially independent, gives you social status, keeps you mentally sharp, educates you, surrounds you with educated peers, etc.

But sure, choose your role as a domestic slave.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

They tried to send him to prison

He(they) tried to un-alive him and he survived by a miracle or luck.

1. What do you mean “tried” to send him? A jury of peers found him guilty in the court of law. There is a rule of law and legal process in this country.

2. I’m pretty sure if the wanted to kill him, the would not send a 20 year old who was rejected from a school shooting club.

The way the USSS did nothing and watched the guy indicates they didn’t care or let it go.

The guy was theee for 2 mins.

Also, the constant hate and spew s at him telling the liberals to get Trump in the bullseye shows what they truly wanted to happen. Also the amount of liberals comparing the shooter missed is appalling, I’m glad Libs if TikTok is exposing them

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Lots of husbands screwing around on their feminists wives all of the time.

The difference is - feminists can devorce.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just can’t imagine why women would vote against their own interests after it took decades to win some of their rights.

But you know what? Let them.

The only way these kind of people learn their lessons is by living the consequences of their actions.

So let them be in the kitchen instead of office, always popping babies and be financially dependent on husbands, unable to get a divorce or support themselves, uneducated, while the men make money and keep a mistress or two around. Pathetic fools.

We pay for the consequences of our choices by the way we live.

Maybe because republicans are fighting for women’s rights.

I will stick with the party who isn’t delusional enough to think men are women and push women out of female spaces for a biological man. I will stick with the party who wants to protect women from getting their chances stolen by boys who think they’re women.

+1 and pretending being drafted to fight in Ukraine is “controlling their (women’s) bodies.

Delusional people cramming lies down our throats, spit that mess out and tell them take themselves over to ukraine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Lots of husbands screwing around on their feminists wives all of the time.

The difference is - feminists can devorce.

True feminists would never marry, so the divorce should not be an issue for them.