"No Labels" Party

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poor baby

+1
Aw. Poor Republican trolls acting new.

I know, it’s some great Republican trolling to say that Trump and Biden are terrible candidates and both parties should have done better.

That is who the voters are choosing as their candidates. Your efforts to change the system would be better spent advocating for greater participation in the primaries or institution of rank choice voting, etc. Third party candidates can not actually win a national election. as much as that frustrates you, that is the system.

Why can't we all just accept the fact that Trump and Biden are amazing candidates and we couldn't do better if we tried? LOL

Go ahead and try. One will be the president and you need to understand that the spoiler helps trump. That is reality as much as you object.

Reality is few people want Trump or Biden to be president going forward and rightly so. Any approach you can come up with to convince people to vote for either of them isn't going to change that sentiment and Trump and Biden certainly are not likely to do anything to help their causes over the next 11.5 months considering their deteriorating mental health statuses. It is what it is.

I’m a Democrat (a real one, not just a Republican who pretends to be Democrat online) and I wasn’t thrilled when Biden won the nomination. I voted for Elizabeth Warren.

But I’ve been pretty happy with Biden. He’s done a lot, especially given the strong headwind of the GOP’s rising fascism and the other headwind of the “mainstream” media hating his guts and undercutting wherever possible. Frankly I find the constant harping on Biden’s age to be ageism in the absence of any proof that he’s actually slipping. Did you see that for the first time in forty years, America’s economy is doing better than China’s? That’s effing monumental. He keeps trying for all Americans and the GOP keeps batting down as much as they can. I’ve been happy with Biden and I’m excited to vote for him again.

Although I’ll be honest. I get more excited to vote for him the dumber the criticisms against him are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poor baby

+1
Aw. Poor Republican trolls acting new.

I know, it’s some great Republican trolling to say that Trump and Biden are terrible candidates and both parties should have done better.

That is who the voters are choosing as their candidates. Your efforts to change the system would be better spent advocating for greater participation in the primaries or institution of rank choice voting, etc. Third party candidates can not actually win a national election. as much as that frustrates you, that is the system.

Why can't we all just accept the fact that Trump and Biden are amazing candidates and we couldn't do better if we tried? LOL

Go ahead and try. One will be the president and you need to understand that the spoiler helps trump. That is reality as much as you object.

Reality is few people want Trump or Biden to be president going forward and rightly so. Any approach you can come up with to convince people to vote for either of them isn't going to change that sentiment and Trump and Biden certainly are not likely to do anything to help their causes over the next 11.5 months considering their deteriorating mental health statuses. It is what it is.

As it stands today I can still vote for whomever I choose. Not my job to “support” bat sh*T crazy trump or feeble minded Biden. I will vote for the person I think is best on the voting day that might me a thirds party so be it. You do you.

If you want to educate yourself about who your third party vote helps to win the election, do that. If you want to remain an ignoramus, your choice. You do you.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Huh. After the way he’s been acting for the last few years, I wouldn’t have guessed that. Good for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Huh. After the way he’s been acting for the last few years, I wouldn’t have guessed that. Good for him.

I too agree with a lot of what Manchin said in that interview. I don't know that he is the right person for the job but someone likely will eventually need to step up to replace Biden as Trump's primary competition in the 2024 general election. No sane person wants Trump back in office and it's becoming more and more evident everyday that Biden is not the favorite to be beat Trump that he should be and we need him to be. Turning 81 next month, Biden is likely to do more to hurt his case for re-election than to help it between now and election day 2024. We've already asked too much of him and we should be thankful for what he has given us in return while letting him retire to spend his final days in leisure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Huh. After the way he’s been acting for the last few years, I wouldn’t have guessed that. Good for him.

I too agree with a lot of what Manchin said in that interview. I don't know that he is the right person for the job but someone likely will eventually need to step up to replace Biden as Trump's primary competition in the 2024 general election. No sane person wants Trump back in office and it's becoming more and more evident everyday that Biden is not the favorite to be beat Trump that he should be and we need him to be. Turning 81 next month, Biden is likely to do more to hurt his case for re-election than to help it between now and election day 2024. We've already asked too much of him and we should be thankful for what he has given us in return while letting him retire to spend his final days in leisure.

Interesting new tack from another Republican poster, but you’re really tedious with this trolling.

[Anonymous]

I look forward to Governor Newsom being the 2024 Democrat nominee

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Huh. After the way he’s been acting for the last few years, I wouldn’t have guessed that. Good for him.

I too agree with a lot of what Manchin said in that interview. I don't know that he is the right person for the job but someone likely will eventually need to step up to replace Biden as Trump's primary competition in the 2024 general election. No sane person wants Trump back in office and it's becoming more and more evident everyday that Biden is not the favorite to be beat Trump that he should be and we need him to be. Turning 81 next month, Biden is likely to do more to hurt his case for re-election than to help it between now and election day 2024. We've already asked too much of him and we should be thankful for what he has given us in return while letting him retire to spend his final days in leisure.

If this country wants to take our kids down to the polling place and show them how to fill in the circle to put a rapist back in the oval office than maybe we deserve that level of presidential representation. Maybe that is the ugly truth about where this country is at this point.

[Anonymous]

And if voters are too stupid too understand that using your one vote to throw away to no labels does nothing to keep that rapist out of the oval office and probably helps him, maybe that is also the ugly truth. That is certainly what no labels is counting on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And if voters are too stupid too understand that using your one vote to throw away to no labels does nothing to keep that rapist out of the oval office and probably helps him, maybe that is also the ugly truth. That is certainly what no labels is counting on.

No labels has no candidate. What we need American voters to do is to vote for whoever is most likely to beat Trump of the candidates running in 2024. It's becoming more and more evident every day that the person most likely to beat Trump isn't Joe Biden.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And if voters are too stupid too understand that using your one vote to throw away to no labels does nothing to keep that rapist out of the oval office and probably helps him, maybe that is also the ugly truth. That is certainly what no labels is counting on.

No labels has no candidate. What we need American voters to do is to vote for whoever is most likely to beat Trump of the candidates running in 2024. It's becoming more and more evident every day that the person most likely to beat Trump isn't Joe Biden.

+1
“Former Wisconsin Reps. Reid Ribble, a Republican from Green Bay, and Ron Kind, a La Crosse Democrat, joined Gephardt Wednesday in opposing a potential No Labels candidate. Both men, who were members of the No Labels-founded bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus, contended the 2024 election was not the right time for a third-party candidate.”
https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/elections/2023/11/16/ex-congressmen-warn-against-no-labels-3rd-party-presidential-effort/71592385007/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And if voters are too stupid too understand that using your one vote to throw away to no labels does nothing to keep that rapist out of the oval office and probably helps him, maybe that is also the ugly truth. That is certainly what no labels is counting on.

No labels has no candidate. What we need American voters to do is to vote for whoever is most likely to beat Trump of the candidates running in 2024. It's becoming more and more evident every day that the person most likely to beat Trump isn't Joe Biden.

He is the only candidate that has in fact beaten trump. Take a look at that instead of listening to some anonymous poster hanging in the no labels thread on dcum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And if voters are too stupid too understand that using your one vote to throw away to no labels does nothing to keep that rapist out of the oval office and probably helps him, maybe that is also the ugly truth. That is certainly what no labels is counting on.

No labels has no candidate. What we need American voters to do is to vote for whoever is most likely to beat Trump of the candidates running in 2024. It's becoming more and more evident every day that the person most likely to beat Trump isn't Joe Biden.

He is the only candidate that has in fact beaten trump. Take a look at that instead of listening to some anonymous poster hanging in the no labels thread on dcum.

This is true but 2024 isn't 2020 and I don't want to be a lazy minded fool with the blood of a Trump 2024 victory on my hands.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I look forward to Governor Newsom being the 2024 Democrat nominee

California is already given for the Dems. Whitmer would be the candidate to run for a guaranteed victory over Trump. Newsome would likely easily beat Trump too but we're looking for the absolutely guarantee that Biden can't give us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And if voters are too stupid too understand that using your one vote to throw away to no labels does nothing to keep that rapist out of the oval office and probably helps him, maybe that is also the ugly truth. That is certainly what no labels is counting on.

No labels has no candidate. What we need American voters to do is to vote for whoever is most likely to beat Trump of the candidates running in 2024. It's becoming more and more evident every day that the person most likely to beat Trump isn't Joe Biden.

He is the only candidate that has in fact beaten trump. Take a look at that instead of listening to some anonymous poster hanging in the no labels thread on dcum.

This is true but 2024 isn't 2020 and I don't want to be a lazy minded fool with the blood of a Trump 2024 victory on my hands.

Trump has only driven voters away. Repulsed them.