Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/26/opinion/dallas-ice-shooter-kirk-luigi.html?smid=bsky-nytopinion&smtyp=cur

“Violence that at least looks left-wing really does appear to be on the rise,” our columnist Michelle Goldberg writes. “Yet the men committing the highest-profile left-coded killings have little discernible connection to progressive politics, on or offline.”

Yeah all the "liberal" papers are running this now, go figure. They can't bear to report on a Cato study showing the opposite.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This kid had no prior girlfriends and had been married all of a year or two and was out there masquerading as a relationship expert, ridiculing men and telling them to act gelded & emasculated to their wives. This isn’t Christianity, it’s subversive Netflix feminism. This sheltered dweeb wasn’t an expert on anything, he was a rich grifter being manipulated and brainwashed by his new wife.

As opposed to “relationship experts” who think marriage is supposed to be a power struggle.

[Anonymous]

All people had to do was to be fully opposed to murdering someone over their political opinion. It’s shocking how many people failed that simple moral test.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All people had to do was to be fully opposed to murdering someone over their political opinion. It’s shocking how many people failed that simple moral test.

Who are you even talking about? Randos on social media? Every single public figure in the Democratic party not only condemned the murder but expressed their condolences. Every single comedian. Almost every single critic of Charlie Kirk here on DCUM prefaced posts by condemning political violence. But you are choosing to focus on a couple of a$$holes on Twitter? Seriously?!

You know who has failed your morality test???? Your own Clown-in-Chief publicly mocked Paul Pelosi! He refused to express his condolences over Melissa Hortman's murder. You know who else? JD Vance when he cheered on the state sanctioned murder of a boat full of people who may well have been completely innocent migrants for all any American citizen knows. And do you want to know who else failed big time??? Charlie Kirk when he said school children were acceptable collateral damage for the preservation of the 2nd Amendment. He did NOT deserve to be murdered for that. No one deserves to be murdered. But they failed your test.

Every prominent Democrat has condemned all political violence, which is more than I can say for the prominent Republicans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All people had to do was to be fully opposed to murdering someone over their political opinion. It’s shocking how many people failed that simple moral test.

Congratulations, pretty much everyone was opposed to that. Glad that it worked out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All people had to do was to be fully opposed to murdering someone over their political opinion. It’s shocking how many people failed that simple moral test.

Agreed. Even people here have said they are happy he is dead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This kid had no prior girlfriends and had been married all of a year or two and was out there masquerading as a relationship expert, ridiculing men and telling them to act gelded & emasculated to their wives. This isn’t Christianity, it’s subversive Netflix feminism. This sheltered dweeb wasn’t an expert on anything, he was a rich grifter being manipulated and brainwashed by his new wife.

As opposed to “relationship experts” who think marriage is supposed to be a power struggle.

Marriage, like all relationships, is a negotiation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This kid had no prior girlfriends and had been married all of a year or two and was out there masquerading as a relationship expert, ridiculing men and telling them to act gelded & emasculated to their wives. This isn’t Christianity, it’s subversive Netflix feminism. This sheltered dweeb wasn’t an expert on anything, he was a rich grifter being manipulated and brainwashed by his new wife.

As opposed to “relationship experts” who think marriage is supposed to be a power struggle.

What?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All people had to do was to be fully opposed to murdering someone over their political opinion. It’s shocking how many people failed that simple moral test.

Agreed. Even people here have said they are happy he is dead.

I don’t recall seeing that at all. If they did, I guess kudos to you for being right?

Did you win something?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All people had to do was to be fully opposed to murdering someone over their political opinion. It’s shocking how many people failed that simple moral test.

Who are you even talking about? Randos on social media? Every single public figure in the Democratic party not only condemned the murder but expressed their condolences. Every single comedian. Almost every single critic of Charlie Kirk here on DCUM prefaced posts by condemning political violence. But you are choosing to focus on a couple of a$$holes on Twitter? Seriously?!

You know who has failed your morality test???? Your own Clown-in-Chief publicly mocked Paul Pelosi! He refused to express his condolences over Melissa Hortman's murder. You know who else? JD Vance when he cheered on the state sanctioned murder of a boat full of people who may well have been completely innocent migrants for all any American citizen knows. And do you want to know who else failed big time??? Charlie Kirk when he said school children were acceptable collateral damage for the preservation of the 2nd Amendment. He did NOT deserve to be murdered for that. No one deserves to be murdered. But they failed your test.

Every prominent Democrat has condemned all political violence, which is more than I can say for the prominent Republicans.

I came here to all this, but perhaps not so eloquently and will now leave with an "amen."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All people had to do was to be fully opposed to murdering someone over their political opinion. It’s shocking how many people failed that simple moral test.

Who are you even talking about? Randos on social media? Every single public figure in the Democratic party not only condemned the murder but expressed their condolences. Every single comedian. Almost every single critic of Charlie Kirk here on DCUM prefaced posts by condemning political violence. But you are choosing to focus on a couple of a$$holes on Twitter? Seriously?!

You know who has failed your morality test???? Your own Clown-in-Chief publicly mocked Paul Pelosi! He refused to express his condolences over Melissa Hortman's murder. You know who else? JD Vance when he cheered on the state sanctioned murder of a boat full of people who may well have been completely innocent migrants for all any American citizen knows. And do you want to know who else failed big time??? Charlie Kirk when he said school children were acceptable collateral damage for the preservation of the 2nd Amendment. He did NOT deserve to be murdered for that. No one deserves to be murdered. But they failed your test.

Every prominent Democrat has condemned all political violence, which is more than I can say for the prominent Republicans.

+1
Even Jimmy Kimmel, who they tried to villainize, tweeted a nice, mature sympathy post shortly after it happened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All people had to do was to be fully opposed to murdering someone over their political opinion. It’s shocking how many people failed that simple moral test.

Agreed. Even people here have said they are happy he is dead.

I don’t recall seeing that at all. If they did, I guess kudos to you for being right?

Did you win something?

Exactly my reaction, too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All people had to do was to be fully opposed to murdering someone over their political opinion. It’s shocking how many people failed that simple moral test.

Agreed. Even people here have said they are happy he is dead.

I've read nearly every page of this thread since the day it happened and I can't remember a single commenter saying they were happy he's dead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All people had to do was to be fully opposed to murdering someone over their political opinion. It’s shocking how many people failed that simple moral test.

You're misinterpreting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All people had to do was to be fully opposed to murdering someone over their political opinion. It’s shocking how many people failed that simple moral test.

Agreed. Even people here have said they are happy he is dead.

I don’t recall seeing that at all. If they did, I guess kudos to you for being right?

Did you win something?

I have posted repeatedly, and I will post again now, that I am happy that Charlie is in the loving and forgiving arms of our Lord Jesus Christ.

I'm pretty sure his own wife said the same think on the Insta and at the big rally in Scottsdale, so what's the big deal?