The Mueller Report

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Notice how Mueller won't testify and the Dems won't subpoena him to do so....

Link to "Mueller won't testify?" because that isn't what he said.

[Anonymous]

When you Democrats start your impeachment, Mueller will be forced to testify under oath. None of them cares about his old age and failing health. He looks to have aged 15 years during these past two years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice how Mueller won't testify and the Dems won't subpoena him to do so....

Link to "Mueller won't testify?" because that isn't what he said.

+1. And the Democrats won’t have to subpoena him.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Notice how Mueller won't testify and the Dems won't subpoena him to do so....

"Notice"? Where did you notice this? Are you seeing things that do not exist?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice how Mueller won't testify and the Dems won't subpoena him to do so....

"Notice"? Where did you notice this? Are you seeing things that do not exist?

Yep, like a tall, full-head-of-hair burly and ripped President.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice how Mueller won't testify and the Dems won't subpoena him to do so....

"Notice"? Where did you notice this? Are you seeing things that do not exist?

Yep, like a tall, full-head-of-hair burly and ripped President.

DP here.
Do you think Nadler is going to subpoena Mueller to testify?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice how Mueller won't testify and the Dems won't subpoena him to do so....

"Notice"? Where did you notice this? Are you seeing things that do not exist?

Yep, like a tall, full-head-of-hair burly and ripped President.

DP here.
Do you think Nadler is going to subpoena Mueller to testify?

He likely won't need to.

[Anonymous]

Mueller just walked back yesterday’s statement


Kerri Kupec, spokeswoman for the Department of Justice and Peter Carr, spokesman for the Special Counsel's Office, released the following statement:

The Attorney General has previously stated that the Special Counsel repeatedly affirmed that he was not saying that, but for the OLC opinion, he would have found the President obstructed justice. The Special Counsel's report and his statement today made clear that the office concluded it would not reach a determination - one way or the other - about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When you Democrats start your impeachment, Mueller will be forced to testify under oath. None of them cares about his old age and failing health. He looks to have aged 15 years during these past two years.

Mueller vs. Nadler. Could be a race to the finish.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Mueller just walked back yesterday’s statement


Kerri Kupec, spokeswoman for the Department of Justice and Peter Carr, spokesman for the Special Counsel's Office, released the following statement:

The Attorney General has previously stated that the Special Counsel repeatedly affirmed that he was not saying that, but for the OLC opinion, he would have found the President obstructed justice. The Special Counsel's report and his statement today made clear that the office concluded it would not reach a determination - one way or the other - about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements.

Barr released this. Sorry to burst your pro-Trump bubble.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mueller just walked back yesterday’s statement


Kerri Kupec, spokeswoman for the Department of Justice and Peter Carr, spokesman for the Special Counsel's Office, released the following statement:

The Attorney General has previously stated that the Special Counsel repeatedly affirmed that he was not saying that, but for the OLC opinion, he would have found the President obstructed justice. The Special Counsel's report and his statement today made clear that the office concluded it would not reach a determination - one way or the other - about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements.

Barr released this. Sorry to burst your pro-Trump bubble.

It was a joint statement. Hence, the bolded.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mueller just walked back yesterday’s statement


Kerri Kupec, spokeswoman for the Department of Justice and Peter Carr, spokesman for the Special Counsel's Office, released the following statement:

The Attorney General has previously stated that the Special Counsel repeatedly affirmed that he was not saying that, but for the OLC opinion, he would have found the President obstructed justice. The Special Counsel's report and his statement today made clear that the office concluded it would not reach a determination - one way or the other - about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements.

Barr released this. Sorry to burst your pro-Trump bubble.

For anyone who still believes in the validity of the Russia investigation.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/47868/breaking-new-damaging-info-comes-out-disgraced-fbi-ryan-saavedra

[Anonymous]

AG William Barr is fearless! Good for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
AG William Barr is fearless! Good for him.

Yes, he learned from Trump that the base doesn't care about lying.