Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


Judge demonstrates minor annoyance DOJ failed to meet and confer with opposing counsel prior to filing its motion. But had it done so it would have ceded the benefit of filing the motion and today’s announcement while Trump dragged his feet. Well played. Trump now has to sh+t or get off the pot by tomorrow.


Key phrase is that DOJ failed to meet with Trump's counsel before seeking the warrant. This was a huge mistake.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


Judge demonstrates minor annoyance DOJ failed to meet and confer with opposing counsel prior to filing its motion. But had it done so it would have ceded the benefit of filing the motion and today’s announcement while Trump dragged his feet. Well played. Trump now has to sh+t or get off the pot by tomorrow.


Key phrase is that DOJ failed to meet with Trump's counsel before seeking the warrant. This was a huge mistake.


No, they failed to meet before filing this motion.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


Judge demonstrates minor annoyance DOJ failed to meet and confer with opposing counsel prior to filing its motion. But had it done so it would have ceded the benefit of filing the motion and today’s announcement while Trump dragged his feet. Well played. Trump now has to sh+t or get off the pot by tomorrow.


Key phrase is that DOJ failed to meet with Trump's counsel before seeking the warrant. This was a huge mistake.


No, before filing today's motion seeking to unseal the warrant. Hence the judge ordered them to.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


Judge demonstrates minor annoyance DOJ failed to meet and confer with opposing counsel prior to filing its motion. But had it done so it would have ceded the benefit of filing the motion and today’s announcement while Trump dragged his feet. Well played. Trump now has to sh+t or get off the pot by tomorrow.


Key phrase is that DOJ failed to meet with Trump's counsel before seeking the warrant. This was a huge mistake.


No, the huge mistake was Trump trying to steal highly classified documents.

Let's cast blame where it exists.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


Judge demonstrates minor annoyance DOJ failed to meet and confer with opposing counsel prior to filing its motion. But had it done so it would have ceded the benefit of filing the motion and today’s announcement while Trump dragged his feet. Well played. Trump now has to sh+t or get off the pot by tomorrow.


Key phrase is that DOJ failed to meet with Trump's counsel before seeking the warrant. This was a huge mistake.


What planet are you living on? The DOJ never meets with defense counsel before seeking a warrant
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


Judge demonstrates minor annoyance DOJ failed to meet and confer with opposing counsel prior to filing its motion. But had it done so it would have ceded the benefit of filing the motion and today’s announcement while Trump dragged his feet. Well played. Trump now has to sh+t or get off the pot by tomorrow.


Key phrase is that DOJ failed to meet with Trump's counsel before seeking the warrant. This was a huge mistake.


What planet are you living on? The DOJ never meets with defense counsel before seeking a warrant


Are you kidding me? Of course they do. You are literally talking out of your rear.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


Judge demonstrates minor annoyance DOJ failed to meet and confer with opposing counsel prior to filing its motion. But had it done so it would have ceded the benefit of filing the motion and today’s announcement while Trump dragged his feet. Well played. Trump now has to sh+t or get off the pot by tomorrow.


Key phrase is that DOJ failed to meet with Trump's counsel before seeking the warrant. This was a huge mistake.


What planet are you living on? The DOJ never meets with defense counsel before seeking a warrant


Are you kidding me? Of course they do. You are literally talking out of your rear.


Oh yes, you are right. FBI loves it when you give the defendant a heads up so they destroy or move evidence before they can get there. You are totally spot on. That's also why warrants are routinely sealed before they are served.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:In early June he was asked to padlock the room. He heard nothing else and then the raid.I find it VERY hard to see how this shows that the DOJ had no other way to enforce the subpoena. This is a political witch hunt and it is going to be very hard for Garland to ever be viewed as a-political again. This is banana republic communist type stuff and if you can't see it, you are the people who were fine with things like Chernobyl and pograms and death camps. You are the ones who are so allegiant to your party and not to principles of freedom and democracy.


He was subpoenaed first!!!!
Subpoena Preceded Search Warrant in Push to Retrieve Material From Trump

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/11/us/politics/trump-fbi-subpoena.html


Uhh. You are so thick. They asked him to put a lock on it. And he did and showed confirmation of the lock. That implies they will tell him what to do with the documents next. And they didn't. And they didn't come back until the raid. I mean, let's assume all the material is classified. If so, H=he SHOULD keep them safe and they should only be transferred to those with an appropriate clearance with appropriate chain of custody. He can't just put the documents in the mail or send them with UPS. SO if it is true that DOJ said "put a lock on them" and he did that, then if they didn't follow up with more instruction and jumped to a raid, this is crazy.


This is daft. The documents were required to be returned pursuant to a valid subpoena, notwithstanding the fact it was illegal to remove them in the first instance. Trump opted to keep classified materials in a non secured faculty for months thereafter. His lawyers could have notified NARA, or better yet NSD, at any time to come collect the documents. They chose not to take steps necessary to protect a national security risk. This comes in the wake of a spate of stories of unauthorized copies of NSA materials being sent to the WH in the last days of the administration by hacks Patel and Cohen-Watnick.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


Judge demonstrates minor annoyance DOJ failed to meet and confer with opposing counsel prior to filing its motion. But had it done so it would have ceded the benefit of filing the motion and today’s announcement while Trump dragged his feet. Well played. Trump now has to sh+t or get off the pot by tomorrow.


Key phrase is that DOJ failed to meet with Trump's counsel before seeking the warrant. This was a huge mistake.


What planet are you living on? The DOJ never meets with defense counsel before seeking a warrant


Are you kidding me? Of course they do. You are literally talking out of your rear.


Oh yes, you are right. FBI loves it when you give the defendant a heads up so they destroy or move evidence before they can get there. You are totally spot on. That's also why warrants are routinely sealed before they are served.


You speak with complete authority and as if everything is done the same way always. If the FBI can get information without a warrant, it does. And it often can because it is the FBI.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The National Security Division/Counterintelligence Section requested that the basement storage locker be secured. This is unprecedented in US history. And in a written response Trump — through his lawyers — gave what was tantamount to the double bird, even though they put on a bigger lock. Trumpworld was itching for a fight.


The lock they installed was so good they had to break the doorframe itself to gain entry.


Many people are saying that this was the biggest, strongest lock in history, anywhere in the world by far.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


Judge demonstrates minor annoyance DOJ failed to meet and confer with opposing counsel prior to filing its motion. But had it done so it would have ceded the benefit of filing the motion and today’s announcement while Trump dragged his feet. Well played. Trump now has to sh+t or get off the pot by tomorrow.


Key phrase is that DOJ failed to meet with Trump's counsel before seeking the warrant. This was a huge mistake.

Yours is the huge mistake.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


Judge demonstrates minor annoyance DOJ failed to meet and confer with opposing counsel prior to filing its motion. But had it done so it would have ceded the benefit of filing the motion and today’s announcement while Trump dragged his feet. Well played. Trump now has to sh+t or get off the pot by tomorrow.


Key phrase is that DOJ failed to meet with Trump's counsel before seeking the warrant. This was a huge mistake.


What planet are you living on? The DOJ never meets with defense counsel before seeking a warrant


Are you kidding me? Of course they do. You are literally talking out of your rear.


The DOJ Chief of Counterintelligence did meet with Trump's lawyer at MAL on June 3, to pick up documents that were subpoenaed. Other than sending a request to lock up the docs we don't know what has happened since then. The Trump lawyers have already proven that they are liars when they didn't disclose that a subpoena had been issued and that's why the DOJ Chief was at MAL. So why should we believe them when they say there's been no further communication or negotiations since then?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Who is the tinfoil brigade. The people who believed in Russian collusion? The people who denied H Biden's laptop was real. You have absolutely no moral or intellectual superiority here if you believed those lies and disseminated that misinformation. You fell for lots of lies before and now are again. You are rubes.





Maybe the people who are continuing to DENY the collusion are the ones who are delusional?


So the dossier was real? Paid for by trump? Hillary had nothing to do with it?


Is this like when trump yelled out random words person woman man camera?

Dossier trump Hillary?

The article pp quoted says manafort admitted sharing polling data with Russia. You know the guy who was trumps campaign manger?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:In early June he was asked to padlock the room. He heard nothing else and then the raid. I find it VERY hard to see how this shows that the DOJ had no other way to enforce the subpoena. This is a political witch hunt and it is going to be very hard for Garland to ever be viewed as a-political again. This is banana republic communist type stuff and if you can't see it, you are the people who were fine with things like Chernobyl and pograms and death camps. You are the ones who are so allegiant to your party and not to principles of freedom and democracy.


The bolded is false. There were several meetings between the DOJ and Trump's attorneys about this.


Trump can go ahead and waive his attorney client privilege on this and show that the negotiations were going nowhere. FBI and DOJ and press all fell for russia collusion and ignored H Biden laptop so for now, I will go ahead and believe Trump and his team because time and again, they are the ones who have been telling the truth.


you can't be for real. is there a hole in the alternate universe? this is just crazy town.


About 30% of our country has fallen prey to deep propaganda at the hands of "newsmax" OAB, Fox, Breitbart, InfoWars, etc.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:In early June he was asked to padlock the room. He heard nothing else and then the raid.I find it VERY hard to see how this shows that the DOJ had no other way to enforce the subpoena. This is a political witch hunt and it is going to be very hard for Garland to ever be viewed as a-political again. This is banana republic communist type stuff and if you can't see it, you are the people who were fine with things like Chernobyl and pograms and death camps. You are the ones who are so allegiant to your party and not to principles of freedom and democracy.


He was subpoenaed first!!!!
Subpoena Preceded Search Warrant in Push to Retrieve Material From Trump

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/11/us/politics/trump-fbi-subpoena.html


Uhh. You are so thick. They asked him to put a lock on it. And he did and showed confirmation of the lock. That implies they will tell him what to do with the documents next. And they didn't. And they didn't come back until the raid. I mean, let's assume all the material is classified. If so, H=he SHOULD keep them safe and they should only be transferred to those with an appropriate clearance with appropriate chain of custody. He can't just put the documents in the mail or send them with UPS. SO if it is true that DOJ said "put a lock on them" and he did that, then if they didn't follow up with more instruction and jumped to a raid, this is crazy.


Hey s for brains. Did it occur to you that no one was actually allowed in most federal buildings during COVID. I haven't gone back to my federal office but once since March of 2020. No one was at NARA waiting for his docs. His basement under lock and key was about as good as it gets and DOJ knew it.

This is daft. The documents were required to be returned pursuant to a valid subpoena, notwithstanding the fact it was illegal to remove them in the first instance. Trump opted to keep classified materials in a non secured faculty for months thereafter. His lawyers could have notified NARA, or better yet NSD, at any time to come collect the documents. They chose not to take steps necessary to protect a national security risk. This comes in the wake of a spate of stories of unauthorized copies of NSA materials being sent to the WH in the last days of the administration by hacks Patel and Cohen-Watnick.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: