Key phrase is that DOJ failed to meet with Trump's counsel before seeking the warrant. This was a huge mistake. |
No, they failed to meet before filing this motion. |
No, before filing today's motion seeking to unseal the warrant. Hence the judge ordered them to. |
No, the huge mistake was Trump trying to steal highly classified documents. Let's cast blame where it exists. |
What planet are you living on? The DOJ never meets with defense counsel before seeking a warrant |
Are you kidding me? Of course they do. You are literally talking out of your rear. |
Oh yes, you are right. FBI loves it when you give the defendant a heads up so they destroy or move evidence before they can get there. You are totally spot on. That's also why warrants are routinely sealed before they are served. |
This is daft. The documents were required to be returned pursuant to a valid subpoena, notwithstanding the fact it was illegal to remove them in the first instance. Trump opted to keep classified materials in a non secured faculty for months thereafter. His lawyers could have notified NARA, or better yet NSD, at any time to come collect the documents. They chose not to take steps necessary to protect a national security risk. This comes in the wake of a spate of stories of unauthorized copies of NSA materials being sent to the WH in the last days of the administration by hacks Patel and Cohen-Watnick. |
You speak with complete authority and as if everything is done the same way always. If the FBI can get information without a warrant, it does. And it often can because it is the FBI. |
Many people are saying that this was the biggest, strongest lock in history, anywhere in the world by far. |
Yours is the huge mistake. |
The DOJ Chief of Counterintelligence did meet with Trump's lawyer at MAL on June 3, to pick up documents that were subpoenaed. Other than sending a request to lock up the docs we don't know what has happened since then. The Trump lawyers have already proven that they are liars when they didn't disclose that a subpoena had been issued and that's why the DOJ Chief was at MAL. So why should we believe them when they say there's been no further communication or negotiations since then? |
About 30% of our country has fallen prey to deep propaganda at the hands of "newsmax" OAB, Fox, Breitbart, InfoWars, etc. |
|