Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

If you’re zooming in on pictures to see whether a widow has tears or not to score political points you need to desperately get a life.

Go outside with your kids or give your parents a call. Take a walk in nature. Do anything but be a politically obsessed online weirdo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She does seem remarkably composed for a devastated young widow. I will say that.

She looks like a young Tammy Faye Bakker.

Young is doing a lot of work here.

I’m not one of those posters who think women over 30 should shrivel up and die, but I cannot stand this phenomenon of women under 40 doing procedures that make them look 10 years older. I was shocked to find out she’s 36. And I thought this before her husband was killed so it’s not grief and lack of sleep from the last few weeks. Her cosmetic procedures are aging her rapidly. And the makeup ain’t helping.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She does seem remarkably composed for a devastated young widow. I will say that.

Quite the Mafia jewelry look going there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you’re zooming in on pictures to see whether a widow has tears or not to score political points you need to desperately get a life.

Go outside with your kids or give your parents a call. Take a walk in nature. Do anything but be a politically obsessed online weirdo.

Lame behavior or not, they aren't wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you’re zooming in on pictures to see whether a widow has tears or not to score political points you need to desperately get a life.

Go outside with your kids or give your parents a call. Take a walk in nature. Do anything but be a politically obsessed online weirdo.

I’ve done all of those things and still had plenty of time to look for tears.

[Anonymous]

I can't believe that none of the perpetually frustrated women of DCUM - and their husbands - has ever heard of beta blockers or benzodiazepines.

This conspiracy theorizing and character assassination of Erika Kirk is DISGUSTING. I'm asserting that and I am VERY LIBERAL and was thus disgusted by much of the spew that came out of Charlie Kirk's ugly gummy mouth - but I would defend to the death his right to say it.

After everything that has happened since his murder, people need to do some serious soul searching including many of you here. Erika Kirk may be a tacky human being, but some of the things you folks are posting here are beyond the pale, truly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a rabbit hole...

THE ERIKA KIRK FILES 🔥

1.
Meet Erika Frantzve Kirk.
Miss Arizona 2012. Trump pageant girl. Casting director.
Now the widowed queen inheriting Charlie Kirk’s empire.

But peel back the “trad wife” veneer, and you’ll find something darker.

2.
She ran Romanian Angels, an “orphan ministry” in Constanța, Romania.
Locals accused it of trafficking children under the guise of mission work.
Exactly the model exposed in Clinton Foundation scandals & Guatamala through ‘Save The Children.’
Those Romanian “orphans” are exported to UK, Israel, and undisclosed islands.

“Philanthropy” or pipeline?

3.
Her résumé writes itself like a honeypot manual:
• Trump’s Miss Arizona, 2012 (Trump-owned pageant).
• Casting director.
• Founder of multiple “nonprofits” with orphan projects.
• Married into MAGA’s golden boy after falling in love over an interview set up by Trump’s team.

That’s not coincidence. That’s placement.

4.
Her father? DoD + Raytheon, Israeli division.
Her parents? Prominent Zionists.
Her grandfather?
Carl Kenneth Frantzve
Vice President of American Bank Note Co. (yes, the ones tied to secure printing & IDs), was Grand Chief of the Independent Order of Vikings, knighted by the King of Sweden.

This is not some random “trad wife.”
She was wealthy before knowing Charlie.

5.
Zoom out.
The architecture is déjà vu:

• Roy Cohn built the CIA sex-kitten blackmail machine.
• Trump owned pageants & hotels perfect leverage farms.
• Epstein wasn’t a fluke, he was a franchise plug-in.

Erika’s pageant-to-“angel” trajectory fits the blueprint.
Why would a young multimillionaire from an initiated family become a Trump pageant girl?.. unless.

Erika attended a Jesuit University, REGIS University located in Denver CO.
Guess who else attended a Jesuit School…

Again, Erika was recruited into modeling, her first pageants were Donald Trump-owned Miss USA pageants, winning Miss Arizona in 2012.

Was she set up for Charlie the way Melania was set up for Donnie?
Brought to the U.S. by Paolo Zampolli
a modeling agent with ties to Mossad, Epstein’s orbit, and elite trafficking rings.

Starting to notice a pattern here?

6.
Even the branding repeats:

• “Tate’s Angels” the cam-girl/trafficking ring.
• “Romanian Angels” Erika’s orphan project accused of trafficking.
• “Angels” as cover for export pipelines of flesh. On the younger side..

This isn’t religious branding. It’s operational branding.

7.
Meanwhile Charlie Kirk’s TPUSA UK launched at the Royal Automobile Club under Prince Michael of Kent, Grandmaster of Freemasonry.
George Farmer (Candace Owens’ husband) sat as Chairman, tied to Andrew Tate long before Candace.

Controlled networks, every link in place.
And George Farmer, Candace’s elite husband ties Tate’s Angels to Erika.

8.
So ask yourself:
Is Erika Kirk the grieving trad wife…
or the CIA-Mossad honeypot who just inherited the keys to MAGA’s youth machine?
Did she pay her dues and rite of passage?

Charlie’s political machine didn’t collapse.
It was transferred.
Resurrected through his ritual death.

Good summary. Everything seems to point towards CIA-Mossad honeypot

You people are fricking crazy.

You don’t even question why all of the bots suddenly were pushing this “it would be so much better if he plead guilty and this didn’t go to trial?”

This all definitely needs to go to trial so that we can get to the bottom of what happened. If it’s as advertised (which I think is unlikely at this point) then so be it. The prosecutors need to present evidence for all of it and the defense needs to be able to force people to testify under oath.

I pray this goes to trial and that it is televised. I want all you conspiracy theorists deflated.

I want to hear what all of the bodyguards have to say. I want to hear what George Zinn has to say. I want to hear what close up front witnesses have to say… I want to know why they didn’t wait for EMS, why weren’t they covered in blood? Where were there footprints? I want to hear from Lance. So many questions, so many inconsistencies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Interesting tidbit on Erica "Her name was Erika Chelsvig from her first marriage. Yes - she has been married before. He was Romanian and likely connected to you know who. I found all this online. They’ve scrubbed a lot. She didn’t meet Charlie by accident. She was sent in to be interviewed by him by her handlers. She began disappearing girls from her church group and was askied to leave"

You are going to have to post a REPUTABLE source to this claim that she was married before. Not one source I have read has said this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe that none of the perpetually frustrated women of DCUM - and their husbands - has ever heard of beta blockers or benzodiazepines.

This conspiracy theorizing and character assassination of Erika Kirk is DISGUSTING. I'm asserting that and I am VERY LIBERAL and was thus disgusted by much of the spew that came out of Charlie Kirk's ugly gummy mouth - but I would defend to the death his right to say it.

After everything that has happened since his murder, people need to do some serious soul searching including many of you here. Erika Kirk may be a tacky human being, but some of the things you folks are posting here are beyond the pale, truly.

Sure you are. But what do benzos have to with this? Educate us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe that none of the perpetually frustrated women of DCUM - and their husbands - has ever heard of beta blockers or benzodiazepines.

This conspiracy theorizing and character assassination of Erika Kirk is DISGUSTING. I'm asserting that and I am VERY LIBERAL and was thus disgusted by much of the spew that came out of Charlie Kirk's ugly gummy mouth - but I would defend to the death his right to say it.

After everything that has happened since his murder, people need to do some serious soul searching including many of you here. Erika Kirk may be a tacky human being, but some of the things you folks are posting here are beyond the pale, truly.

What is it about liberals online and the need to constantly support every right wing talking point? Almost like...anyone can say anything online.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The grifter who made a career out of mocking college and telling American kids to not waste their time and money on a degree … is going to be given an honorary degree from Hillsdale College. Erika gets one, too.

https://www.freep.com/story/news/education/2025/09/22/hillsdale-to-award-honorary-degrees-to-charlie-kirk-and-his-widow/86300039007/

Hillsdale, that always tried to sell itself as the “intellectuals” on the right. lol. This won’t help their cause.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you’re zooming in on pictures to see whether a widow has tears or not to score political points you need to desperately get a life.

Go outside with your kids or give your parents a call. Take a walk in nature. Do anything but be a politically obsessed online weirdo.

I’ve done all of those things and still had plenty of time to look for tears.

It’s a real shame that Erika didn’t shed a sufficient number of tears to satisfy the liberals.
I think if she had known that she would be scrutinized and criticized for capturing her tears with a tissue and not letting them run down her face she would have just let the tears go.

On second thought- no she wouldn’t. She doesn’t GAF what you idiots think.

[Anonymous]

Maybe they will have the trauma doc who assessed Charlie, that would be helpful, how about autopsy results, forensics experts?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She does seem remarkably composed for a devastated young widow. I will say that.

Quite the Mafia jewelry look going there.

Wow, she's tacky.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe that none of the perpetually frustrated women of DCUM - and their husbands - has ever heard of beta blockers or benzodiazepines.

This conspiracy theorizing and character assassination of Erika Kirk is DISGUSTING. I'm asserting that and I am VERY LIBERAL and was thus disgusted by much of the spew that came out of Charlie Kirk's ugly gummy mouth - but I would defend to the death his right to say it.

After everything that has happened since his murder, people need to do some serious soul searching including many of you here. Erika Kirk may be a tacky human being, but some of the things you folks are posting here are beyond the pale, truly.

Is this your first day on the internet? I haven’t seen anything on this thread “beyond the pale” yet.