Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:That is such a great question. I was briefly involved with the school pre launch but left after being disillusioned with the gap between the stated mission and how resources were being allocated that had no bearing on it. A few examples..
1. They hired Renzo Piano (at an exorbitant architect's fee) but barely had any educational experts or $$ allocated to design curriculum pre-launch
2. The renovation of the facility ran far over budget and was ultimately in excess of $200 million - again money that should have been better spent on curriculum, resources for students, essential supplies - not Whittle's real estate vanity project
(Btw - if you read the Town & Country article that came out before the school opened, you'll see the author was similarly perplexed by Chris Whittle going on and on about the real estate and not discussing curriculum at all...)
3. Cost structure was hamstrung from the start. The initial rent expense of the school was easily in excess of $30 million. They needed 800-900 full tuition paying kids JUST to cover rent. When you added in the exorbitant salaries for "leadership", faculty pay, and other operating costs, the required number of children was about 1,500 - just to break even... And when they came miserably short of their enrollment targets, the focus became on how to scrape up enough $$ to survive another month instead of a clear headed focus on delivering quality education
The initial group of educators the school hired were all incredibly talented and inspired to deliver a great education to their students. Sadly they were never even given a fighting shot at accomplishing this
THANK YOU for taking the time to share this information. I’m the PP who was part of the founding year and noticed when the amazing admissions director abruptly left. I knew something was wrong right away. And I appreciate the better understanding of the inner workings during the initial months. I still blame myself for not doing my homework and blindly believing that this was going to be a great experience for DC.
I TOTALLY AGREE with PP about personal experience with great teachers who despite poor circumstances CAN deliver a great learning experience. DC had one humanities teacher in particular who genuinely tried his hardest to deliver a meaningful and engaging experience despite a flimsy curriculum from which to work from. We asked the MS Dir (at that time who has since left )numerous times to provide us with the curriculum. Anything ! A list of topics! A plan! A table of contents! NOTHING. They didn’t have anything established. And to top it off the classmates ( entire grade of less than 18 students) that founding year was a major disappointment. Certainly some were probably motivated but in general the apathy and less ambitious nature of the group was the main challenge for even the most talented of teachers.