Little pink monster blog

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And I’m really asking this in sincerity: they loved each other at one point. Had two children together. How can do much hate exist? How can it grow to that extreme? I know many people have the similar thought I have which is that my husband is not only a part of me, I can live without him I spent a while living alone without him but somehow my life made more sense with him and as a whole he might be one of the best parts of me. We haven’t been married long so I attribute this as the definite honeymoon years (we definitely our own issues and challenges and have a baby on the way so those will grow). But with how much every spouse starts out loving their wife or husband, how does so much hate grow?
But then with kids, this I don’t understand. I’m pregnant with out first now, before getting pregnant I thought “sure if he cheats on me I’d never let him see the kids again” but now I would t want my kids to not know their dad (barring abuse) but using children and the emotions of your children to hurt your ex is so hurtful and hateful. I know every couple can say “never us, it’ll never happen” but it does and it can. How does so much hate grow and how can you let it eat into your kids life ? How well do you really know the person you marry ?

It's a thin line between love and hate. They're two sides of the same coin.

[Anonymous]

Natasha’s IG post seems to imply someone she was positive was on her side in the custody battle switched to Kane’s. I wonder who it could’ve been? I’d think given how long this mess has been going on people would’ve already picked their sides and would stick to them. I remember both sides were alleging substance abuse - does Natasha’s post have to do with that?

[Anonymous]

I hope for the kids that the one who went back to that place for help finds the help they need to stay on the road to recovery. Addiction is a cancerous mental health concern.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hope for the kids that the one who went back to that place for help finds the help they need to stay on the road to recovery. Addiction is a cancerous mental health concern.

What?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Natasha’s IG post seems to imply someone she was positive was on her side in the custody battle switched to Kane’s. I wonder who it could’ve been? I’d think given how long this mess has been going on people would’ve already picked their sides and would stick to them. I remember both sides were alleging substance abuse - does Natasha’s post have to do with that?

Why do you think that versus the other PP’s guess that it was the judge not siding with her? Her comment about “fighting to hold her family together” implies she was losing some amount of custody. I thought her reason for going back to court was to get more time with the girls. And now, perhaps she has less?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hope for the kids that the one who went back to that place for help finds the help they need to stay on the road to recovery. Addiction is a cancerous mental health concern.

Hmm, is that why no one has seen him lately?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Natasha’s IG post seems to imply someone she was positive was on her side in the custody battle switched to Kane’s. I wonder who it could’ve been? I’d think given how long this mess has been going on people would’ve already picked their sides and would stick to them. I remember both sides were alleging substance abuse - does Natasha’s post have to do with that?

Why do you think that versus the other PP’s guess that it was the judge not siding with her? Her comment about “fighting to hold her family together” implies she was losing some amount of custody. I thought her reason for going back to court was to get more time with the girls. And now, perhaps she has less?

Natasha said “recently friends in my life that I thought would always be there, aren’t”... she’s not talking about the judge

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Natasha’s IG post seems to imply someone she was positive was on her side in the custody battle switched to Kane’s. I wonder who it could’ve been? I’d think given how long this mess has been going on people would’ve already picked their sides and would stick to them. I remember both sides were alleging substance abuse - does Natasha’s post have to do with that?

Why do you think that versus the other PP’s guess that it was the judge not siding with her? Her comment about “fighting to hold her family together” implies she was losing some amount of custody. I thought her reason for going back to court was to get more time with the girls. And now, perhaps she has less?

Natasha said “recently friends in my life that I thought would always be there, aren’t”... she’s not talking about the judge

Ahhh. The PP on the previous page said that below is what she wrote on IG. It didn't reference friends so it seemed like she was just saying that consequences happened that she was expecting and in court consequences come from the judge.

“Morning my friend! So sorry for disappearing a bit, I hope one day life will be secure enough & I’ll be brave enough to share my entire story with you. I think there could be great healing by taking charge of the pain & determining myself what power it can hold. I also know that even though I wish these experiences didn’t happen, I have the power to help others by sharing them & then in return healing can come for me by knowing good came from all the heartache. That could be the one thing which brings peace, knowing the suffering meant something.

I knew when I made the decision to go back to court there would be unforeseen consequences, unfortunately I was short sighted as to where they would come from. But I’m working through it, I can look to the past & see that every time I thought I wouldn’t, couldn’t, overcome God gave me the strength to not just survive, but thrive. I can’t explain why, it’s certainly not because I on my own am so amazing, far from it, but that’s the beauty of grace right? Undeserved, unexplainable, grace. We just have to give ourselves the chance to accept it.

I had to pause my shop for a bit while my family & I made keeping our family together the top priority (I’m SO sorry if you tried to order or contact me through the shop & you didn’t get a reply!) but I’m now working again. You can expect some posts on new pieces this week!”

There is a reason there is the expression that you find out who your true friends are after divorce. It’s too bad that someone took this long to show their true colors to her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Natasha’s IG post seems to imply someone she was positive was on her side in the custody battle switched to Kane’s. I wonder who it could’ve been? I’d think given how long this mess has been going on people would’ve already picked their sides and would stick to them. I remember both sides were alleging substance abuse - does Natasha’s post have to do with that?

Why do you think that versus the other PP’s guess that it was the judge not siding with her? Her comment about “fighting to hold her family together” implies she was losing some amount of custody. I thought her reason for going back to court was to get more time with the girls. And now, perhaps she has less?

Natasha said “recently friends in my life that I thought would always be there, aren’t”... she’s not talking about the judge

Np.

I wouldn't necessarily say that someone switched from her side to kane's, just that someone left her side.

From what I've seen the spectators are probably sick of both of them at this point. They have both behaved pretty badly recently, and bringing it back out into the public discourse is helping no one. If I were connected I'd be telling both of them they're aholes by now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Natasha’s IG post seems to imply someone she was positive was on her side in the custody battle switched to Kane’s. I wonder who it could’ve been? I’d think given how long this mess has been going on people would’ve already picked their sides and would stick to them. I remember both sides were alleging substance abuse - does Natasha’s post have to do with that?

Why do you think that versus the other PP’s guess that it was the judge not siding with her? Her comment about “fighting to hold her family together” implies she was losing some amount of custody. I thought her reason for going back to court was to get more time with the girls. And now, perhaps she has less?

Natasha said “recently friends in my life that I thought would always be there, aren’t”... she’s not talking about the judge

Np.

I wouldn't necessarily say that someone switched from her side to kane's, just that someone left her side.

From what I've seen the spectators are probably sick of both of them at this point. They have both behaved pretty badly recently, and bringing it back out into the public discourse is helping no one. If I were connected I'd be telling both of them they're aholes by now.

You're so right. How can anyone stand either of them at this point? Makes you wonder if they'll spend the rest of their lives feuding, and what a great life that is for their kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:On a lighter note, has anyone actually SEEN Kane lately? There are no recent pictures of him on any social media accounts. And I’m guessing he gained a ton of weight ??

The last post with his face in it was 4 weeks ago and he looks very puffy, red and blotchy.

[Anonymous]

Both kane and natasha look aged beyond their years. Stress and anger’s effect on appearance is no joke. Hopefully the never ending battle will be over soon. Their poor daughters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Both kane and natasha look aged beyond their years. Stress and anger’s effect on appearance is no joke. Hopefully the never ending battle will be over soon. Their poor daughters.

Wouldn't count on it. How many years has it been, 5?

[Anonymous]

Enough with the vague sympathy-milking references to going to court, of “someday sharing her story” and just spill what is going on. Is Kane vying for full custody of the girls? If she is fully in the right here, something is not adding up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kane is a heartless pig. Girls will be able to see they all this when they grow up.

And Natasha is a drama queen B just like my DH's ex, she is the nightmare that just won't go away. Had I known about the crazy of my DH's ex (and NO, I had nothing to do with their breakup) I would have ran for the hills. This woman, Natasha, abused alcohol and drugs and exposed her children to the dangers of this behavior and the women on this board hold her up to be a saint. If a man had done that, off with his head. Hypocrites.