Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It seems like they’re not really fans of ECNL or the direction the league is headed. I think their decision to move on is pretty bold, but they might end up looking like geniuses soon!
Loudoun will always be a step behind because they don’t take the time to develop their teams. You see it from the u littles - all they care about is winning that’s why these teams struggle when they get older. They moved on from ECNL because they can’t stand being the small fish in a big pond.
You are clueless, Loudoun has some of the most competitive younger age teams in dmv.
Very true, solely from a HUGE pool of young local players. It's slipped in qualify recently with the influx of other clubs. They don't develop their players they just grab the meanest and fastest kids and run them into the ground by u14 when you have to understand how to move the ball not just blast and chase it
Tell me which ECNL does develop their players. They all recruit and import players. VDA is exhibit A. Sure, clubs will have some players who have been with them since U9 but that’s not development that’s just luck that a talented player happened to live nearby. There is not a single top player at these clubs who wouldn’t have been just as good had they been born 20 miles away and joined a different club at U9
So what’s your point? Not challenging you but dont follow your point? Also, if every club on this thread doesn’t develop kids, how do kids transfer from other clubs? I hear this argument about the big clubs, they dont develop kids. But as a parent who does not have a kid on these big clubs, is that really the case? From outside looking in, it seems like they practice just like everyone else. While yes, some new kids come in, is it really fair that these clubs do no development? Honest question.