2030 Girls Lacrosse

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a 2030 parent and I have no idea what’s happening on this thread any more. Can we go back to arguing about the BLC 2030 dynamics?

In 2 years half of NL will join the best from Stars, BLC, YJMA, and Pride to beat MnD DC. It doesn’t matter.

FACTS!

In 2 years half of BLC will join CLC Blue, the other half CLC orange. The remaining spots will go to top players from the other teams.

FACTS!

We might be 2 years into the slide by then. Definitely not a fact. CLC has a lot of work to do, including the nonstop promotion on this thread. So keep it up.

Considering Capital does not even update their website for years on end, I seriously doubt they would be “promoting” on social media. Why is that? Maybe it’s the academic profile of their players, but they have the best recruiting outcomes in the area, including the Baltimore teams. The product speaks for itself and they basically don’t need to do anything. Starting tomorrow, 40-44 of the 2026 players between Blue and Orange will commit to play in college. Certainly, there may be other paths to take. But even after all the back and forth here, I have not read a single good argument as to why another far less certain path would be preferable. I would love to hear the case being made. Please enlighten me!

Lmao. They obv have engaged you and others to that end. Think it "might" be tough on that end with the strength of the '30s and how the '28 and '29s play out. Nothing that Cap (from what it looks like given their minions being put to work) doesn't know better than any of us. Pretty crucial time for them.

KCM's last club squad did equally as well as CLC, and that was with an MC Elite team! Same with her hs squad. Cap knows this, and stack with some possibly weak '28 Cap results coming up, they're vulnerable. Maybe the '30s is going to be where they have to make hay or else. Which is why you or others have been engaged. We'll see.

Would love the see the analysis on MCE doing “equally as well” as CLC. Where did all the players end up?

Can give it, but what's your agenda?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a 2030 parent and I have no idea what’s happening on this thread any more. Can we go back to arguing about the BLC 2030 dynamics?

In 2 years half of NL will join the best from Stars, BLC, YJMA, and Pride to beat MnD DC. It doesn’t matter.

FACTS!

In 2 years half of BLC will join CLC Blue, the other half CLC orange. The remaining spots will go to top players from the other teams.

FACTS!

We might be 2 years into the slide by then. Definitely not a fact. CLC has a lot of work to do, including the nonstop promotion on this thread. So keep it up.

Considering Capital does not even update their website for years on end, I seriously doubt they would be “promoting” on social media. Why is that? Maybe it’s the academic profile of their players, but they have the best recruiting outcomes in the area, including the Baltimore teams. The product speaks for itself and they basically don’t need to do anything. Starting tomorrow, 40-44 of the 2026 players between Blue and Orange will commit to play in college. Certainly, there may be other paths to take. But even after all the back and forth here, I have not read a single good argument as to why another far less certain path would be preferable. I would love to hear the case being made. Please enlighten me!

Thanks Capital dad, A+ for effort. Care to wager on the 26 class for CLC vs the Baltimore teams and recruiting? The top 10 recruits seem to be missing representatives from CLC. Pushing the CLC motto isn’t going to work any more.

Capital takes advantage of generally having higher academic players who can get in to more schools to juice their recruiting numbers. That does not mean they have better players than Baltimore teams.

Yeah, they get in to good schools and probably do well academically. The academics are needed by some schools, Cap fits the bill, they can pay and most sit the bench.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a 2030 parent and I have no idea what’s happening on this thread any more. Can we go back to arguing about the BLC 2030 dynamics?

In 2 years half of NL will join the best from Stars, BLC, YJMA, and Pride to beat MnD DC. It doesn’t matter.

FACTS!

In 2 years half of BLC will join CLC Blue, the other half CLC orange. The remaining spots will go to top players from the other teams.

FACTS!

We might be 2 years into the slide by then. Definitely not a fact. CLC has a lot of work to do, including the nonstop promotion on this thread. So keep it up.

Considering Capital does not even update their website for years on end, I seriously doubt they would be “promoting” on social media. Why is that? Maybe it’s the academic profile of their players, but they have the best recruiting outcomes in the area, including the Baltimore teams. The product speaks for itself and they basically don’t need to do anything. Starting tomorrow, 40-44 of the 2026 players between Blue and Orange will commit to play in college. Certainly, there may be other paths to take. But even after all the back and forth here, I have not read a single good argument as to why another far less certain path would be preferable. I would love to hear the case being made. Please enlighten me!

Lmao. They obv have engaged you and others to that end. Think it "might" be tough on that end with the strength of the '30s and how the '28 and '29s play out. Nothing that Cap (from what it looks like given their minions being put to work) doesn't know better than any of us. Pretty crucial time for them.

KCM's last club squad did equally as well as CLC, and that was with an MC Elite team! Same with her hs squad. Cap knows this, and stack with some possibly weak '28 Cap results coming up, they're vulnerable. Maybe the '30s is going to be where they have to make hay or else. Which is why you or others have been engaged. We'll see.

Except she is not coaching for NL/M&D. Stop trying so hard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a 2030 parent and I have no idea what’s happening on this thread any more. Can we go back to arguing about the BLC 2030 dynamics?

In 2 years half of NL will join the best from Stars, BLC, YJMA, and Pride to beat MnD DC. It doesn’t matter.

FACTS!

In 2 years half of BLC will join CLC Blue, the other half CLC orange. The remaining spots will go to top players from the other teams.

FACTS!

We might be 2 years into the slide by then. Definitely not a fact. CLC has a lot of work to do, including the nonstop promotion on this thread. So keep it up.

Considering Capital does not even update their website for years on end, I seriously doubt they would be “promoting” on social media. Why is that? Maybe it’s the academic profile of their players, but they have the best recruiting outcomes in the area, including the Baltimore teams. The product speaks for itself and they basically don’t need to do anything. Starting tomorrow, 40-44 of the 2026 players between Blue and Orange will commit to play in college. Certainly, there may be other paths to take. But even after all the back and forth here, I have not read a single good argument as to why another far less certain path would be preferable. I would love to hear the case being made. Please enlighten me!

Lmao. They obv have engaged you and others to that end. Think it "might" be tough on that end with the strength of the '30s and how the '28 and '29s play out. Nothing that Cap (from what it looks like given their minions being put to work) doesn't know better than any of us. Pretty crucial time for them.

KCM's last club squad did equally as well as CLC, and that was with an MC Elite team! Same with her hs squad. Cap knows this, and stack with some possibly weak '28 Cap results coming up, they're vulnerable. Maybe the '30s is going to be where they have to make hay or else. Which is why you or others have been engaged. We'll see.

Except she is not coaching for NL/M&D. Stop trying so hard.

Yeah, she's just the recruiting director. Which your charges have attacked her since she's been announced, making it personal, bringing in her family and kids. Pretty disgusting, actually. But you have no shame.

You might want to pull up your Cap girls' recruiting vids. Most don't pass along Cap contact info, which is usually pretty standard. The minority that do, it's an email only. Sounds like that Cap recruiting complex isn't all that interpersonal or relied upon by the players.

[Anonymous]

Nobody has said anything remotely personal. Stop trying to stir the pot. This has all become so dumb and toxic. NL boosters need to get a grip.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a 2030 parent and I have no idea what’s happening on this thread any more. Can we go back to arguing about the BLC 2030 dynamics?

In 2 years half of NL will join the best from Stars, BLC, YJMA, and Pride to beat MnD DC. It doesn’t matter.

FACTS!

In 2 years half of BLC will join CLC Blue, the other half CLC orange. The remaining spots will go to top players from the other teams.

FACTS!

We might be 2 years into the slide by then. Definitely not a fact. CLC has a lot of work to do, including the nonstop promotion on this thread. So keep it up.

Exactly, and if the 2030 YJMA and ‘M&D DC teams do well for the next 2 years their top players may choose to stay on those clubs during high school. CLC will have real competition for the best 2030s

You do realize that NL 2030 is a B-level team, right? They aren’t even in the same conversation as YJMA and BLC.

Facts!

[Anonymous]

[i]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a 2030 parent and I have no idea what’s happening on this thread any more. Can we go back to arguing about the BLC 2030 dynamics?

In 2 years half of NL will join the best from Stars, BLC, YJMA, and Pride to beat MnD DC. It doesn’t matter.

FACTS!

In 2 years half of BLC will join CLC Blue, the other half CLC orange. The remaining spots will go to top players from the other teams.

FACTS!

We might be 2 years into the slide by then. Definitely not a fact. CLC has a lot of work to do, including the nonstop promotion on this thread. So keep it up.

Not a CLC parent, but know some of the 2030 parents. A combined BLC and YJMA team with a few additions from other clubs could be a top 5 team. They could possibly compete for the top spot. There’s an incentive for them to look at moving to CLC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[i]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a 2030 parent and I have no idea what’s happening on this thread any more. Can we go back to arguing about the BLC 2030 dynamics?

In 2 years half of NL will join the best from Stars, BLC, YJMA, and Pride to beat MnD DC. It doesn’t matter.

FACTS!

In 2 years half of BLC will join CLC Blue, the other half CLC orange. The remaining spots will go to top players from the other teams.

FACTS!

We might be 2 years into the slide by then. Definitely not a fact. CLC has a lot of work to do, including the nonstop promotion on this thread. So keep it up.

Not a CLC parent, but know some of the 2030 parents. A combined BLC and YJMA team with a few additions from other clubs could be a top 5 team. They could possibly compete for the top spot. There’s an incentive for them to look at moving to CLC.

Sure, but I’m guessing the top YJMA girls won’t go to CLC.

[Anonymous]

Why not? They already lost one to Hero’s.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[i]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a 2030 parent and I have no idea what’s happening on this thread any more. Can we go back to arguing about the BLC 2030 dynamics?

In 2 years half of NL will join the best from Stars, BLC, YJMA, and Pride to beat MnD DC. It doesn’t matter.

FACTS!

In 2 years half of BLC will join CLC Blue, the other half CLC orange. The remaining spots will go to top players from the other teams.

FACTS!

We might be 2 years into the slide by then. Definitely not a fact. CLC has a lot of work to do, including the nonstop promotion on this thread. So keep it up.

Not a CLC parent, but know some of the 2030 parents. A combined BLC and YJMA team with a few additions from other clubs could be a top 5 team. They could possibly compete for the top spot. There’s an incentive for them to look at moving to CLC.

Sure, but I’m guessing the top YJMA girls won’t go to CLC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[i]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a 2030 parent and I have no idea what’s happening on this thread any more. Can we go back to arguing about the BLC 2030 dynamics?

In 2 years half of NL will join the best from Stars, BLC, YJMA, and Pride to beat MnD DC. It doesn’t matter.

FACTS!

In 2 years half of BLC will join CLC Blue, the other half CLC orange. The remaining spots will go to top players from the other teams.

FACTS!

We might be 2 years into the slide by then. Definitely not a fact. CLC has a lot of work to do, including the nonstop promotion on this thread. So keep it up.

Not a CLC parent, but know some of the 2030 parents. A combined BLC and YJMA team with a few additions from other clubs could be a top 5 team. They could possibly compete for the top spot. There’s an incentive for them to look at moving to CLC.

We have seen this story before from the Pride parents. The what if teams and what if rankings is a nice fantasy but not reality. The CLC talent is fading and so will their success

[Anonymous]

I am a new poster just reading but am confused by the poster that keeps stating that Capital parents are on here promoting. Not sure why so much hate on them when frankly they stay in their lane and get kids recruited. They don’t do social media or update a website but they are on here worried about NL? Come on bruh. What did they do to you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am a new poster just reading but am confused by the poster that keeps stating that Capital parents are on here promoting. Not sure why so much hate on them when frankly they stay in their lane and get kids recruited. They don’t do social media or update a website but they are on here worried about NL? Come on bruh. What did they do to you?

Bruh? I guess the simple answer is there is no reason for them to be on here. These girls can’t even play for Cap for 2 years. Let them develop let these posters move on to threads that apply to you and your team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am a new poster just reading but am confused by the poster that keeps stating that Capital parents are on here promoting. Not sure why so much hate on them when frankly they stay in their lane and get kids recruited. They don’t do social media or update a website but they are on here worried about NL? Come on bruh. What did they do to you?

Seriously. Too busy to update their website but they can come on here and post all day? Some parents are getting concerned they will lose players to CLC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why not? They already lost one to Hero’s.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[i]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a 2030 parent and I have no idea what’s happening on this thread any more. Can we go back to arguing about the BLC 2030 dynamics?

In 2 years half of NL will join the best from Stars, BLC, YJMA, and Pride to beat MnD DC. It doesn’t matter.

FACTS!

In 2 years half of BLC will join CLC Blue, the other half CLC orange. The remaining spots will go to top players from the other teams.

FACTS!

We might be 2 years into the slide by then. Definitely not a fact. CLC has a lot of work to do, including the nonstop promotion on this thread. So keep it up.

Not a CLC parent, but know some of the 2030 parents. A combined BLC and YJMA team with a few additions from other clubs could be a top 5 team. They could possibly compete for the top spot. There’s an incentive for them to look at moving to CLC.

Sure, but I’m guessing the top YJMA girls won’t go to CLC.

Exactly. YJMA already lost a top player. This year was just the beginning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why not? They already lost one to Hero’s.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[i]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a 2030 parent and I have no idea what’s happening on this thread any more. Can we go back to arguing about the BLC 2030 dynamics?

In 2 years half of NL will join the best from Stars, BLC, YJMA, and Pride to beat MnD DC. It doesn’t matter.

FACTS!

In 2 years half of BLC will join CLC Blue, the other half CLC orange. The remaining spots will go to top players from the other teams.

FACTS!

We might be 2 years into the slide by then. Definitely not a fact. CLC has a lot of work to do, including the nonstop promotion on this thread. So keep it up.

Not a CLC parent, but know some of the 2030 parents. A combined BLC and YJMA team with a few additions from other clubs could be a top 5 team. They could possibly compete for the top spot. There’s an incentive for them to look at moving to CLC.

Sure, but I’m guessing the top YJMA girls won’t go to CLC.

Exactly. YJMA already lost a top player. This year was just the beginning.

YJMA lost one player and gained three others, probably a net positive and it sounds like typical movement between clubs between seasons. No sign that all of their top talent will flee to CLC in two years.