Greendland - why not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why should a weak country like Denmark claim Greenland they can't even defend it

Great idea. Me and a few of my well-armed friends will be moving into your house and claiming all your stuff and all your money. You’re too weak to defend them, so therefore you don’t deserve to own anything.

See how stupid that sounds?

That sounds like exactly how Denmark took “ownership” of Greenland.

Only if you are an idiot or maga.

So tell me, oh wise one - did Denmark show up and ask the people living on Greenland whether they wanted Greenland to be “owned” by Denmark?

Did any European colonial power show up in the Americas and “ask” the people they found living their whether they wanted their land to be “owned” by a European colonial power?

Nah - European countries took their colonies in the Americas by force. Denmark has no legitimate claim to Greenland.

Mark my words - Greenland will be part of the USA by July 4th, just in time for the Independence Day celebrations. And Trump will go down in history as having greatly expanded the territory of the United States. Take it to the bank.

Dude stick to one story about why you want Greenland. I think the one about Trump play Risk and think Greenland is important IRL is your best option. The Republican morons like yourself would understand it.

+1 They went from “Denmark didn’t ask, they just took it” to “Denmark has no legitimate claim” and then to “America won’t ask, we’ll just take it. Our claim is legitimate. Unlike Denmark’s.” Calvinball logic.

Nah. More like: America's claim to Greenland is just as legitimate as Denmark's. Denmark just took it; their claim has as much legitimacy as that. Denmark can't defend Greenland and it's of vital importance to our national security. So, we'll just take it; and our claim will has as much legitimacy as Denmark's. It's not complicated.

What a silly assertion. Do we just deny every treaty we signed anytime we feel like it?

1917, USA entered into a treaty with Denmark in which we acknowledged their possession of Greenland and they gave us the Dutch West Indies - including the island which more recently became knows as Epstein’s Rape Island.

Denmark has the legitimate claim to Greenland, as acknowledged by the USA for 109 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why should a weak country like Denmark claim Greenland they can't even defend it

Great idea. Me and a few of my well-armed friends will be moving into your house and claiming all your stuff and all your money. You’re too weak to defend them, so therefore you don’t deserve to own anything.

See how stupid that sounds?

That sounds like exactly how Denmark took “ownership” of Greenland.

Only if you are an idiot or maga.

So tell me, oh wise one - did Denmark show up and ask the people living on Greenland whether they wanted Greenland to be “owned” by Denmark?

Did any European colonial power show up in the Americas and “ask” the people they found living their whether they wanted their land to be “owned” by a European colonial power?

Nah - European countries took their colonies in the Americas by force. Denmark has no legitimate claim to Greenland.

Mark my words - Greenland will be part of the USA by July 4th, just in time for the Independence Day celebrations. And Trump will go down in history as having greatly expanded the territory of the United States. Take it to the bank.

Dude stick to one story about why you want Greenland. I think the one about Trump play Risk and think Greenland is important IRL is your best option. The Republican morons like yourself would understand it.

+1 They went from “Denmark didn’t ask, they just took it” to “Denmark has no legitimate claim” and then to “America won’t ask, we’ll just take it. Our claim is legitimate. Unlike Denmark’s.” Calvinball logic.

Nah. More like: America's claim to Greenland is just as legitimate as Denmark's. Denmark just took it; their claim has as much legitimacy as that. Denmark can't defend Greenland and it's of vital importance to our national security. So, we'll just take it; and our claim will has as much legitimacy as Denmark's. It's not complicated.

Again, by this logic what claim does the U.S. have to ANY of its territory? It has none. Your idea is that no country has any sovereign territory. This is absurd.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:if someone wants to spout facts, here are a few...

74% of all of the insulin used in the USA comes from Denmark

100% of the Ozempic used in the USA comes from Denmark

15% of the shipping containers bringing imports to the US comes from Denmark.

Would be a shame if Denmark decided to halt this.

Please tell 100% of Botox comes from Denmark because I have a plan to end this immediately

Nope. The majority of Botox is manufactured by Abbvie in Ireland.

Perhaps Ireland can come to Denmarks aid then?

Is someone invading Greenland now? Why does anyone need to come to their aid?

It’s like people can’t even remember their recent history. A lunatic leader is threatening Greenland’s sovereignty. That’s enough reason for NATO to come to their aid. How much was ignored in Europe while Hitler was slowly dismantling Germanys democracy and Jews were disappearing. If the neighboring countries were more vigilant it could have been stopped.

This Greenland thing is just like the Holocaust

You think it’s hyperbole because you’re s moron. Go look up Hitler’s seizure of Poland, the motivations behind it, the initial efforts at appeasement, and what ultimately happened. Tell us how it turned out for the world.

[Anonymous]

If he wants it so bad, why don't we pass a bill and offer them a few billion dollars for it? Trump can even offer to cover the fee.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If he wants it so bad, why don't we pass a bill and offer them a few billion dollars for it? Trump can even offer to cover the fee.

It's not for sale.

[Anonymous]

Trump should just seize Russia instead. Russia can’t even take over Ukraine after how many years? Obviously they can’t defend themselves and therefore have no claim to any territory. It’s very rude of Putin to not submit and make Russia the 51st state.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why should a weak country like Denmark claim Greenland they can't even defend it

Great idea. Me and a few of my well-armed friends will be moving into your house and claiming all your stuff and all your money. You’re too weak to defend them, so therefore you don’t deserve to own anything.

See how stupid that sounds?

That sounds like exactly how Denmark took “ownership” of Greenland.

Only if you are an idiot or maga.

So tell me, oh wise one - did Denmark show up and ask the people living on Greenland whether they wanted Greenland to be “owned” by Denmark?

Did any European colonial power show up in the Americas and “ask” the people they found living their whether they wanted their land to be “owned” by a European colonial power?

Nah - European countries took their colonies in the Americas by force. Denmark has no legitimate claim to Greenland.

Mark my words - Greenland will be part of the USA by July 4th, just in time for the Independence Day celebrations. And Trump will go down in history as having greatly expanded the territory of the United States. Take it to the bank.

Dude stick to one story about why you want Greenland. I think the one about Trump play Risk and think Greenland is important IRL is your best option. The Republican morons like yourself would understand it.

+1 They went from “Denmark didn’t ask, they just took it” to “Denmark has no legitimate claim” and then to “America won’t ask, we’ll just take it. Our claim is legitimate. Unlike Denmark’s.” Calvinball logic.

Nah. More like: America's claim to Greenland is just as legitimate as Denmark's. Denmark just took it; their claim has as much legitimacy as that. Denmark can't defend Greenland and it's of vital importance to our national security. So, we'll just take it; and our claim will has as much legitimacy as Denmark's. It's not complicated.

Using this logic, Mike Tyson can take Katie Miller, because her husband certainly can't defend her against Tyson.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why should a weak country like Denmark claim Greenland they can't even defend it

Great idea. Me and a few of my well-armed friends will be moving into your house and claiming all your stuff and all your money. You’re too weak to defend them, so therefore you don’t deserve to own anything.

See how stupid that sounds?

That sounds like exactly how Denmark took “ownership” of Greenland.

Only if you are an idiot or maga.

So tell me, oh wise one - did Denmark show up and ask the people living on Greenland whether they wanted Greenland to be “owned” by Denmark?

Did any European colonial power show up in the Americas and “ask” the people they found living their whether they wanted their land to be “owned” by a European colonial power?

Nah - European countries took their colonies in the Americas by force. Denmark has no legitimate claim to Greenland.

Mark my words - Greenland will be part of the USA by July 4th, just in time for the Independence Day celebrations. And Trump will go down in history as having greatly expanded the territory of the United States. Take it to the bank.

Dude stick to one story about why you want Greenland. I think the one about Trump play Risk and think Greenland is important IRL is your best option. The Republican morons like yourself would understand it.

+1 They went from “Denmark didn’t ask, they just took it” to “Denmark has no legitimate claim” and then to “America won’t ask, we’ll just take it. Our claim is legitimate. Unlike Denmark’s.” Calvinball logic.

Nah. More like: America's claim to Greenland is just as legitimate as Denmark's. Denmark just took it; their claim has as much legitimacy as that. Denmark can't defend Greenland and it's of vital importance to our national security. So, we'll just take it; and our claim will has as much legitimacy as Denmark's. It's not complicated.

Using this logic, Mike Tyson can take Katie Miller, because her husband certainly can't defend her against Tyson.

Very Neanderthal! Very on point for MAGA.

[Anonymous]

Can we close this thread now that Trump TACO’d?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why should a weak country like Denmark claim Greenland they can't even defend it

Great idea. Me and a few of my well-armed friends will be moving into your house and claiming all your stuff and all your money. You’re too weak to defend them, so therefore you don’t deserve to own anything.

See how stupid that sounds?

That sounds like exactly how Denmark took “ownership” of Greenland.

Only if you are an idiot or maga.

So tell me, oh wise one - did Denmark show up and ask the people living on Greenland whether they wanted Greenland to be “owned” by Denmark?

Did any European colonial power show up in the Americas and “ask” the people they found living their whether they wanted their land to be “owned” by a European colonial power?

Nah - European countries took their colonies in the Americas by force. Denmark has no legitimate claim to Greenland.

Mark my words - Greenland will be part of the USA by July 4th, just in time for the Independence Day celebrations. And Trump will go down in history as having greatly expanded the territory of the United States. Take it to the bank.

Dude stick to one story about why you want Greenland. I think the one about Trump play Risk and think Greenland is important IRL is your best option. The Republican morons like yourself would understand it.

+1 They went from “Denmark didn’t ask, they just took it” to “Denmark has no legitimate claim” and then to “America won’t ask, we’ll just take it. Our claim is legitimate. Unlike Denmark’s.” Calvinball logic.

Nah. More like: America's claim to Greenland is just as legitimate as Denmark's. Denmark just took it; their claim has as much legitimacy as that. Denmark can't defend Greenland and it's of vital importance to our national security. So, we'll just take it; and our claim will has as much legitimacy as Denmark's. It's not complicated.

This is super rape-y and why you can’t trust MAGAs around women or children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can we close this thread now that Trump TACO’d?

He TACOed on tariffs, not on invasion. I mean, sure he said that he wouldn't take it by force, but he also said that about Venezuela. How quickly you forget. The European forces aren't going home now because Dementia Don said words.

Don't forget he also told a room full of diplomats that he was talking about ICELAND.

So, this thread is, unfortunately, still relevant.

[Anonymous]

UK handed the islands that have Diego Garcia over to China backed Mauritius.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:UK handed the islands that have Diego Garcia over to China backed Mauritius.

Which Rubio emphatically said Trump was on board with last year. What's the change?

[Anonymous]

h[twitter]ttps://x.com/AdamKinzinger/status/2014038484827193789?s=20[/twitter]

[Anonymous]