The Cambridges News and Updates ( Prince William, Kate Middleton, George, Charlotte and Louis)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The liar.

The fraud.

The asshole.

IS. LEAVING.

International relocation = moving to the US to work for Harry and Meghan?

Not a chance they would take them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The liar.

The fraud.

The asshole.

IS. LEAVING.

They should have kicked him to the curb a long time ago. He’s not very good at his job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The liar.

The fraud.

The asshole.

IS. LEAVING.

Is this normal? To announce that he’s leaving — but not for 7 months? This seems like a massive amount of very public support from the Cambridge’s, and I’m wondering what might be behind it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The liar.

The fraud.

The asshole.

IS. LEAVING.

Is this normal? To announce that he’s leaving — but not for 7 months? This seems like a massive amount of very public support from the Cambridge’s, and I’m wondering what might be behind it.

If anyone has any dirt on them it is him. I think they wanted him to go but are afraid of him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The liar.

The fraud.

The asshole.

IS. LEAVING.

Is this normal? To announce that he’s leaving — but not for 7 months? This seems like a massive amount of very public support from the Cambridge’s, and I’m wondering what might be behind it.

If anyone has any dirt on them it is him. I think they wanted him to go but are afraid of him.

That could be it but the judge for the legal case against the Daily F just released full details about what Jason had to do with the case and it doesn't look great

[Anonymous]

He was fired because the official judgement of Meghan's court case was posted online today and there's no way around the fact that a senior member of Kensington Palace staff was calling up tabloid editors and lying about a senior Royal multiple times.

The relevant evidence about sources came mainly from the editor, Mr Verity. He said he had received what he considered to be “high-grade information” from a “senior member of the royal household” who was “a serious individual in a position of authority and responsibility” with “direct knowledge” of the matters in question.

https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/hrh-the-duchess-of-sussex-v-associated-newspapers-limited/

[Anonymous]

How is he going to run a bullying investigation that HE started from another country?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The struggle for relevancy is so so real.

There's this -

Then there's this -

If this is a M/H plug, look at the engagement statistics on both tweets. Also, while Oprah is an accomplished professional, I wouldn’t say she’s that relevant these days. I’m a millennial and don’t know anyone my age who particularly cares what she has to say. A lot of Gen Z probably doesn’t even know who she is.

Interesting. Nobody cares what she has to say and yet her little backyard interview generated an audience the size of the Super Bowl.

You’re really reaching with the engagement statistics. You’re comparing a tweet from the official dukeandduchessofcambridge account with a tweet from random person who posted about Oprah abd Harry’s project...

Have you seen O magazine lately? Quite thin. Advertisers are staying away.

I haven't seen any magazine that isn't a fraction of its previous size lately. They're lucky to still be in existence as so many have been discontinued.

Perhaps you've missed the tectonic shift that has taken place in the publishing industry in recent years?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How is he going to run a bullying investigation that HE started from another country?

The bullying investigation was all smokes and mirrors. If they cared about bullying they would have investigated at the time. Plus a number of the victims involve didn’t file a formal complaint but just spoke to Jason about it and doesn’t seem like a great idea to pursue an investigation with unwilling victims.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The liar.

The fraud.

The asshole.

IS. LEAVING.

Is this normal? To announce that he’s leaving — but not for 7 months? This seems like a massive amount of very public support from the Cambridge’s, and I’m wondering what might be behind it.

If anyone has any dirt on them it is him. I think they wanted him to go but are afraid of him.

That could be it but the judge for the legal case against the Daily F just released full details about what Jason had to do with the case and it doesn't look great

Why would the journalist or newspaper be at fault if they received info from a legit high ranking staffer like Jason?

If that’s truly the case that he was providing info, then the paper should not have lost.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The liar.

The fraud.

The asshole.

IS. LEAVING.

Is this normal? To announce that he’s leaving — but not for 7 months? This seems like a massive amount of very public support from the Cambridge’s, and I’m wondering what might be behind it.

If anyone has any dirt on them it is him. I think they wanted him to go but are afraid of him.

That could be it but the judge for the legal case against the Daily F just released full details about what Jason had to do with the case and it doesn't look great

Why would the journalist or newspaper be at fault if they received info from a legit high ranking staffer like Jason?

If that’s truly the case that he was providing info, then the paper should not have lost.

Is that a serious question? Newspapers are supposed to fact check and verify information.

Imagine the implications of what you’re saying. You think a newspaper can publish anything they want about any public figure as long as they get one staff member as an anonymous source? Now apply it to someone else, maybe even someone you like. Let’s say Kate or the queen. Suppose a staff member got ahold of Kate’s racy love letters to her old boyfriends and leaked that she was having an affair now. Should the newspaper be able to print that?

[Anonymous]

Whatever it is that he's hiding I hope he can sleep at night.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The struggle for relevancy is so so real.

There's this -

Then there's this -

If this is a M/H plug, look at the engagement statistics on both tweets. Also, while Oprah is an accomplished professional, I wouldn’t say she’s that relevant these days. I’m a millennial and don’t know anyone my age who particularly cares what she has to say. A lot of Gen Z probably doesn’t even know who she is.

I mean, you really can’t compare engagement results from a tweet by William with this random guy. Now if Harry tweeted? Fair game. It’s apples and oranges from an audience standpoint. I suppose you could look at engagement compared to their audience but this is just sloppy data analysis. - millennial with a marketing background

[Anonymous]

https://pagesix.com/2021/05/31/kate-middleton-dresses-down-in-jeans-to-get-covid-19-vaccine/

Saw this and thought of everyone claiming she had been vaccinated for months when she went maskless at the vigil.

So many assumptions on this board!