Who did you think killed JonBenet?

[Anonymous]

How would someone know how to fashion a garrote? What are they used for or the knots needed for it used for?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the Santa theory also explains why she was penetrated with an object. At his age/health, he couldn't get an erection.

Why the ransom note?

There's no reason an intruder would leave both the ransom note and the body.

There's no reason the family would leave both the ransom note and the body.

Sure there is. The ransom note points to an intruder rather than family. Whether the body is ultimately found inside or outside the house, it's useful to the parents to have evidence suggesting the killer wasn't a family member.

An intruder could use the same logic. Throw the police off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the Santa theory also explains why she was penetrated with an object. At his age/health, he couldn't get an erection.

Why the ransom note?

There's no reason an intruder would leave both the ransom note and the body.

There's no reason the family would leave both the ransom note and the body.

Sure there is. The ransom note points to an intruder rather than family. Whether the body is ultimately found inside or outside the house, it's useful to the parents to have evidence suggesting the killer wasn't a family member.

An intruder could use the same logic. Throw the police off.

The note points to an intruder. So how would it throw police off of the idea that it was an intruder?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When Patsy woke up the first thing she heard was John turning the water on in his bathroom. Patsy had her own bathroom but remembered the shower was still broken so decided just to throw the clothes on and put her makeup on. She was rushing.

O.k. that makes a certain amount of sense I suppose. I'm still not understanding why she put on yesterday's clothes when she had a closet full of clothes. PPs have mentioned that maybe she had a limited wardrobe because she had recently gained weight. Yet, she apparently didn't feel the need to pack much because she had a closet full of clothes at their other house....

This woman had clothes. It makes no sense that she would put old party clothes on.

She was wearing a Christmas sweater to the party. She probably wanted to wear it again on their trip. How many Christmas sweaters do you have? Probably one tops, right? Also tell me if Patsy did commit the crime in her clothes she was wearing all night, don't you think she would dispose of the clothes before the police got there, i.e. in case there was evidence on her clothes? It makes no sense to leave an outfit on that you've committed a crime in.

[Anonymous]

OK this is weird. This article lists evidence taken from the crime scene. Including that JB was wearing a yellow ID bracelet that had her name and the date 12-25-96 on it. Her name and date of death, on a bracelet that she was wearing.

Who gave her the bracelet?

http://extras.denverpost.com/news/ram1014k.htm

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How would someone know how to fashion a garrote? What are they used for or the knots needed for it used for?

Yeah the investigator Jim Smit said that was a pretty serious knot. He said he wasn't sure he could tie a knot like that. The killer had to know what s/he was doing....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How would someone know how to fashion a garrote? What are they used for or the knots needed for it used for?

I have no idea. Is that something that sexual predators typically use? I doubt it.

It's just weird enough to think that maybe the idea came from a book or a movie or some type of training that a person would have?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the Santa theory also explains why she was penetrated with an object. At his age/health, he couldn't get an erection.

Why the ransom note?

There's no reason an intruder would leave both the ransom note and the body.

There's no reason the family would leave both the ransom note and the body.

Sure there is. The ransom note points to an intruder rather than family. Whether the body is ultimately found inside or outside the house, it's useful to the parents to have evidence suggesting the killer wasn't a family member.

An intruder could use the same logic. Throw the police off.

The note points to an intruder. So how would it throw police off of the idea that it was an intruder?

An intruder with perverted motivations might try to make it seem financially motivated.

Anyway, I don't think the ransom note clearly points to the murdered. It's just a confusing piece of evidence. Probably because it was meant to mislead police.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How would someone know how to fashion a garrote? What are they used for or the knots needed for it used for?

I have no idea. Is that something that sexual predators typically use? I doubt it.

It's just weird enough to think that maybe the idea came from a book or a movie or some type of training that a person would have?

Bet it was in Mrs. Clause's play

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How would someone know how to fashion a garrote? What are they used for or the knots needed for it used for?

I have no idea. Is that something that sexual predators typically use? I doubt it.

It's just weird enough to think that maybe the idea came from a book or a movie or some type of training that a person would have?

Maybe a very creative, but wacky person. Santa's wife?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How would someone know how to fashion a garrote? What are they used for or the knots needed for it used for?

I have no idea. Is that something that sexual predators typically use? I doubt it.

It's just weird enough to think that maybe the idea came from a book or a movie or some type of training that a person would have?

Bet it was in Mrs. Clause's play

Yup!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When Patsy woke up the first thing she heard was John turning the water on in his bathroom. Patsy had her own bathroom but remembered the shower was still broken so decided just to throw the clothes on and put her makeup on. She was rushing.

O.k. that makes a certain amount of sense I suppose. I'm still not understanding why she put on yesterday's clothes when she had a closet full of clothes. PPs have mentioned that maybe she had a limited wardrobe because she had recently gained weight. Yet, she apparently didn't feel the need to pack much because she had a closet full of clothes at their other house....

This woman had clothes. It makes no sense that she would put old party clothes on.

She was wearing a Christmas sweater to the party. She probably wanted to wear it again on their trip. How many Christmas sweaters do you have? Probably one tops, right? Also tell me if Patsy did commit the crime in her clothes she was wearing all night, don't you think she would dispose of the clothes before the police got there, i.e. in case there was evidence on her clothes? It makes no sense to leave an outfit on that you've committed a crime in.

The point of wearing that sweater is what though? She wanted to be festive on her early morning private plane trip? She was trying to save time so she just threw on whatever was close and that sweater was it? She was planning to visit people unshowered and in previously worn clothes from the evening before?

Or maybe she laid down in her clothes planning to get back up and prepare for the trip but wound up falling asleep and then rushing when she realized that she still had a ton to do. Or maybe she never went to bed at all.

[Anonymous]

Here's something I don't understand.

If you think it was an intruder -- and I'm genuinely undecided -- how do you explain this: there was "touch DNA" on some of JonBenet's clothing items. But none of that DNA matched any of the intruder suspects -- like Santa or his wife. So if you think it was Santa, and you believe the DNA points to a non-family member, how do you reconcile that?

[Anonymous]

After John divorced his first wife Lucinda, John's dad married Lucinda's mother. Weird

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How would someone know how to fashion a garrote? What are they used for or the knots needed for it used for?

I have no idea. Is that something that sexual predators typically use? I doubt it.

It's just weird enough to think that maybe the idea came from a book or a movie or some type of training that a person would have?

Maybe a very creative, but wacky person. Santa's wife?

Not buying that these two elderly people did this. I find it preposterous actually.