Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone remember if US soccer (USSF) just decided to go BY without governing bodies USYS, US Club soccer on board? Was it unanimous decision?
USSF decided without input from other groups, to their surprise. It seems to have been a source of some hard feelings. In the ECNL podcast, they alluded to this and said something to the effect of "maybe this time the people who have to actually live with the decision will be consulted."
How many governing bodies are there?
In England the FA is the governing body.
All other associations fall under.
Isn't US Soccer the governing body?
My understanding is that US Soccer is meant to sit at the top, with way too many sitting below. But they have no actual authority over all those below them if there's a real disagreement. For instance, when they switched to BY as a new "mandate," US Club and USYS later issued press releases that they would adopt the new standards. It wasn't automatic. The way I saw it explained was that US Soccer's real power over a group like ECNL was to stop considering their players for national teams, which US Soccer is solely in charge of. Otherwise, the bodies "underneath" US Soccer generally adopt standards simply to avoid headaches with inter-league play. Many AYSO regions didn't adopt the BY mandate. They don't play inter-league or tournaments, or send players to national teams, so US Soccer really can't force anything on them, just recommend it.