Who listens to Ben Shapiro?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Every time I browse the podcast charts I take a look to see what he's talking about. Based on the episodes, he's not a thinker but a demagogue. Maybe he's a crafty demagogue, but that's not worth my time.

the intellectuals of the right are mostly silent these days. It's not surprising, because the GOP has been on an anti-intellectual tear for two decades at least.

You've got that wrong....there is silence in many corners because nobody wants to draw the ire of the mindless attack mob. The left has sadly become intolerant of any speech that doesn't align perfectly with whatever woke agenda has captured the spirit of the day. We've entered a new era of censorial insanity and it's existentially dangerous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Every time I browse the podcast charts I take a look to see what he's talking about. Based on the episodes, he's not a thinker but a demagogue. Maybe he's a crafty demagogue, but that's not worth my time.

the intellectuals of the right are mostly silent these days. It's not surprising, because the GOP has been on an anti-intellectual tear for two decades at least.

“Intellectuals of the right”? There aren’t any, PP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every time I browse the podcast charts I take a look to see what he's talking about. Based on the episodes, he's not a thinker but a demagogue. Maybe he's a crafty demagogue, but that's not worth my time.

the intellectuals of the right are mostly silent these days. It's not surprising, because the GOP has been on an anti-intellectual tear for two decades at least.

You've got that wrong....there is silence in many corners because nobody wants to draw the ire of the mindless attack mob. The left has sadly become intolerant of any speech that doesn't align perfectly with whatever woke agenda has captured the spirit of the day. We've entered a new era of censorial insanity and it's existentially dangerous.

Oh stop it. Plenty of people love and even monetize the mob. That's not the reason.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just checked.

1.53 million subscribers on YouTube!

That's a lot.

His chat was Rogan was pretty good, I didn't realize he had such a following.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every time I browse the podcast charts I take a look to see what he's talking about. Based on the episodes, he's not a thinker but a demagogue. Maybe he's a crafty demagogue, but that's not worth my time.

the intellectuals of the right are mostly silent these days. It's not surprising, because the GOP has been on an anti-intellectual tear for two decades at least.

You've got that wrong....there is silence in many corners because nobody wants to draw the ire of the mindless attack mob. The left has sadly become intolerant of any speech that doesn't align perfectly with whatever woke agenda has captured the spirit of the day. We've entered a new era of censorial insanity and it's existentially dangerous.

Oh yes of course no one on the right attacks anyone, or censors their speech, or is canceled due to their agenda.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does Ben have aspergers? The way he is always looking down and bobbing his head is really off-putting. Kind of talks fast in a monotone.

You’ve got to wonder about a man who’s been married for three years asking his chiropractor wife what a wet pu~~y is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just checked.

1.53 million subscribers on YouTube!

That's a lot.

His chat was Rogan was pretty good, I didn't realize he had such a following.

You didn't realize there were 1.53 million RWNJ's?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every time I browse the podcast charts I take a look to see what he's talking about. Based on the episodes, he's not a thinker but a demagogue. Maybe he's a crafty demagogue, but that's not worth my time.

the intellectuals of the right are mostly silent these days. It's not surprising, because the GOP has been on an anti-intellectual tear for two decades at least.

You've got that wrong....there is silence in many corners because nobody wants to draw the ire of the mindless attack mob. The left has sadly become intolerant of any speech that doesn't align perfectly with whatever woke agenda has captured the spirit of the day. We've entered a new era of censorial insanity and it's existentially dangerous.

Oh yes of course no one on the right attacks anyone, or censors their speech, or is canceled due to their agenda.

Examples?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every time I browse the podcast charts I take a look to see what he's talking about. Based on the episodes, he's not a thinker but a demagogue. Maybe he's a crafty demagogue, but that's not worth my time.

the intellectuals of the right are mostly silent these days. It's not surprising, because the GOP has been on an anti-intellectual tear for two decades at least.

“Intellectuals of the right”? There aren’t any, PP.

William F Buckley debated James Baldwin at Cambridge. These are thinkers. Ben Shapiro is just another pundit. It's hard to take him seriously when he's so busy "dunking on" Cardi B and Megan Thee Stallion...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every time I browse the podcast charts I take a look to see what he's talking about. Based on the episodes, he's not a thinker but a demagogue. Maybe he's a crafty demagogue, but that's not worth my time.

the intellectuals of the right are mostly silent these days. It's not surprising, because the GOP has been on an anti-intellectual tear for two decades at least.

You've got that wrong....there is silence in many corners because nobody wants to draw the ire of the mindless attack mob. The left has sadly become intolerant of any speech that doesn't align perfectly with whatever woke agenda has captured the spirit of the day. We've entered a new era of censorial insanity and it's existentially dangerous.

Oh yes of course no one on the right attacks anyone, or censors their speech, or is canceled due to their agenda.

Examples?

You’re kidding, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every time I browse the podcast charts I take a look to see what he's talking about. Based on the episodes, he's not a thinker but a demagogue. Maybe he's a crafty demagogue, but that's not worth my time.

the intellectuals of the right are mostly silent these days. It's not surprising, because the GOP has been on an anti-intellectual tear for two decades at least.

You've got that wrong....there is silence in many corners because nobody wants to draw the ire of the mindless attack mob. The left has sadly become intolerant of any speech that doesn't align perfectly with whatever woke agenda has captured the spirit of the day. We've entered a new era of censorial insanity and it's existentially dangerous.

Oh yes of course no one on the right attacks anyone, or censors their speech, or is canceled due to their agenda.

Examples?

Mike Cernovich got James Gunn fired, Colin Kapaernik, the Dixie Chicks got banned from country radio, hundreds of teachers who got canceled when the school found out they are gay, the professors who get fired because of their views on the middle east... how many do you need to see?

If this wasn't obvious, then you are reading propaganda instead of news.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every time I browse the podcast charts I take a look to see what he's talking about. Based on the episodes, he's not a thinker but a demagogue. Maybe he's a crafty demagogue, but that's not worth my time.

the intellectuals of the right are mostly silent these days. It's not surprising, because the GOP has been on an anti-intellectual tear for two decades at least.

“Intellectuals of the right”? There aren’t any, PP.

William F Buckley debated James Baldwin at Cambridge. These are thinkers. Ben Shapiro is just another pundit. It's hard to take him seriously when he's so busy "dunking on" Cardi B and Megan Thee Stallion...

Yes, and pwning himself in the process by admitting he’s never encountered WAP, despite being married. Not surprising, but he shouldn’t have put that much info about his lack of sexual prowess on Twitter. His wife must be mortified.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every time I browse the podcast charts I take a look to see what he's talking about. Based on the episodes, he's not a thinker but a demagogue. Maybe he's a crafty demagogue, but that's not worth my time.

the intellectuals of the right are mostly silent these days. It's not surprising, because the GOP has been on an anti-intellectual tear for two decades at least.

“Intellectuals of the right”? There aren’t any, PP.

William F Buckley debated James Baldwin at Cambridge. These are thinkers. Ben Shapiro is just another pundit. It's hard to take him seriously when he's so busy "dunking on" Cardi B and Megan Thee Stallion...

Yes, and pwning himself in the process by admitting he’s never encountered WAP, despite being married. Not surprising, but he shouldn’t have put that much info about his lack of sexual prowess on Twitter. His wife must be mortified.

If it owns the libs, it's definitely worth it. See, for example, Herman Cain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every time I browse the podcast charts I take a look to see what he's talking about. Based on the episodes, he's not a thinker but a demagogue. Maybe he's a crafty demagogue, but that's not worth my time.

the intellectuals of the right are mostly silent these days. It's not surprising, because the GOP has been on an anti-intellectual tear for two decades at least.

“Intellectuals of the right”? There aren’t any, PP.

William F Buckley debated James Baldwin at Cambridge. These are thinkers. Ben Shapiro is just another pundit. It's hard to take him seriously when he's so busy "dunking on" Cardi B and Megan Thee Stallion...

Yes, and pwning himself in the process by admitting he’s never encountered WAP, despite being married. Not surprising, but he shouldn’t have put that much info about his lack of sexual prowess on Twitter. His wife must be mortified.

If it owns the libs, it's definitely worth it. See, for example, Herman Cain.

"owning the libs" makes him a demagogue, not a thinker.

[Anonymous]

Op, my DC snd his friends who attend a big 3 school considered to be very liberal love him. That’s good enough for me