Eh, I’m not an attacker. Despite posting on DCUM. I can understand why some people feel disadvantaged by the new criteria / process. However, since they don’t know my kid’s scores, why would they assume they scored higher? Also, since my kid goes to the same school they do, I’m not sure the new criteria even factor in - unless non-CES kids in a regional center somehow get preference, which is not the impression I’m getting. |
It seems to be a mixed bag, but I know at least two of the four teachers at OVES are in the process (or maybe just completed) their Master's in Gifted Education and JHU. They were very adorably doing the program at the same time. |
RCES is a local, rather than regional, CES. Last year we only knew of 2 kids who got into a ms magnet (could have been more we just didn’t know about). This year there were at least 7. It doesn’t work out the same way every year. |
Oh, that is great! Kids probably benefited so much from that, too. This is at Stonegate and so if anyone in the interwebs has any insight about the CES 4th grade teacher, I would love to hear it...5th grade teach seemed awesome. |
|
So is the “virtual open house” deal school by school?
BC our CES sent a link to a slide deck but that was it... no Q+A, no discussion, nothing. Did I miss something? I am taking it as a big red flag... |
It must be school by school, but I wouldn't take it as too big of a flag. We got the notice the day before they hosted it and no slides...it really seems like the teachers are all just underwater right now. Give it a week, or email the school and ask if they will be doing anything for live QandA. |
It must be school by school, but I wouldn't take it as too big of a flag. We got the notice the day before they hosted it and no slides...it really seems like the teachers are all just underwater right now. Give it a week, or email the school and ask if they will be doing anything for live QandA. |
| Barnsley sent out a slide deck with separate videos from principal, teachers, and students. Was well done and then they also have two Zoom Q & A sessions. Went to the first one this evening. Was very informative and great! |
It's really great. I can't speak to how their expertise translated to the academics versus a teacher with different training, but I can tell you that their understanding of the "baggage" that comes with some gifted kids was really amazing, the best my kid had in their MCPS career to date. |
Oh wow, that really is super. Actually, one of my flags (again, please no one flame me) was when I asked her about how she approaches social/emotional support in the class she said if the kid "needs it, we have a counselor"...which was just bizarre and not at all what i was asking about...gifted kids, in my experience, have a full range of emotional oddities and i assumed that would be a part of the curriculum or program... |
|
I'm not flaming you but is this a real question? You are asking if dealing with kids' "emotional oddities" because they are "gifted" is part of the curriculum or program? No. Just no.
Not at our CES. There are some kids who have social or emotional issues just like at any other school. There are also many kids who are very social, outgoing and confident. There are some teachers who try to support the kids who have struggling socially or emotionally but they do this because they are nice. Most of them don't do anything. |
It's up to the individual principal to hire the teachers for their school. Different principals have different preferences. |
I'm not the PP, but I understand the question. First, the disclaimers: Not all gifted kids are quirky, and not all quirky kids are gifted. Not all gifted kids are anxious, and not all anxious kids are gifted. Heck, not all kids in the CES program are "gifted." Some are just bright and hard working. But are there more quirky kids and anxious kids in a CES classroom than in a mainstream 4th or 5th grade class? Yes, absolutely. Having teachers who have taken the time to develop some tools for teaching those kids can only be a good thing. It's not part of the curriculum, nor should it be, but ideally the teachers would have some tools in their toolboxes for common social-emotional issues that are more likely to come up in a classroom of high achievers. |
Drew posted a slide deck with videos and has a scheduled Zoom Q&A next week. |
+1000 NP here. It stands to reason, with asynchronous development being well-documented with *gifted* kids, social-emotional development would fit into a program like this. I don't think it is an odd question and I also know MCPS are working towards integrating these tools into the standard curriculum. If I did have a kid who was anxious or "quirky" it would be the first question I asked before pulling them into a whole new program. |