Yeah why don’t you. There isn’t enough T.J. related threads here. |
This is very true. My friend lives in a major TJ feeder zone and we're in a Title 1 zone. We often compared notes and it was like night and day. Her child was in gen ED in elementary and mine were in AAP yet they received similar education. Our MS was like your Title 1 - no real focus on anybody interested in TJ. I couldn't find any information on TJ on the school website until I looked in a dark corner covered in cobwebs. There was a PDF and first sentences were something like, "TJ is a very difficult school to get into. Admissions are very competitive" - as if to say, "Don't bother! You don't have a chance!" When I asked the administration about TJ, they said that they most kids want to stay at the base and not many are interested in going. We opted for the AAP center MS and it was better there. Since then school websites have been standardized and now offer similar information on TJ so at least that's a step in the right direction, but that hasn't moved the needle at all given the minute acceptance rate at that school. |
Well said and agree-another TJ parent. |
So self-congratulatory and so self-indulgent. The parents turn a blind eye to the rampant cheating, depression, and Adderall abuse. |
Those words coming from the mouth of a liar like you won't be credible. Keep labeling. That's all you can do. |
I'm the teacher who posted this and it's spot on. I wish people looked at the differences in the middle schools. It's so, so stark and feeds into this whole mega feeder system for TJ. |
| We’re in a MS that sent dozens to TJ last year. The adm didn’t provide much support to kids aspiring to go to TJ, other than mentioning TJ application in an email and having TJ staff coming to school once talking to kids and parents. The principal and math teachers discourage kids taking summer geometry but a few still did. STEM clubs were mostly run by parents. In fact the MS never sent more than 10 kids every year before it became a AAP center last year. Bottom line is that MS doesn’t play a role as important as the student body does in terms of TJ application and acceptance. |
+2. LOL. I thought the same thing when I read it. And for what it's worth, saying a few parents will try to find a way to game the system is NOT a reason not to make changes if the changes are the right thing to do. |
| I teach science in college and have received teaching awards. I had to help a friend's child last year for his science class. I was disappointed in TJ's teaching quality. The kid is super smart and hard working. He is probably the top 5% in TJ. However he basically got nothing from class. In addition, the quiz/exam was unrealistic hard. I honestly cannot see anyone could pass the class without significant outside tutoring help. I was told many students dropped after the first exam. This is not a problem with the students, but the teachers. I heard not all teachers in TJ are like this but it is common. High expectation is not the same as just throw things at students. Teachers make a big difference in student's life. Guess what is this student's perception in this subject now? We are losing a bright student in this STEM field. This is sad. Based on this experience, I will think twice before send my own kid to TJ. |
| Eliminating TJ is preferable but if that is not feasible it should certainly be reformed. |
This has to be AP Physics. The first test is a weeder. The kids choose between honors and AP. Half the AP the kids fail the first test and drop down into honors where they belong. It’s meant to be unrealistically hard and scare the kids. And they don’t teach most of it. Its self study over the summer (plus learning BC Calc if you haven’t). Now, I’m not defending this. TJ says no to bypassing honors Bio and Chem. Not sure why they don’t with Physics. It makes no sense, and TJ just needs to tell kids to do honors physics first, rather than actively weeding. TJ just finished making a lot of reforms in the math department. I expect them to requiring BC completed and a skip test to go straight into AP Physics. Or just saying not possible. That said, the honors physics and all of the science teaching is very strong. Math can get unrealistic in terms of depth. Science is hard, but with labs, etc, any kid who works should be able to get a B without a tutor and a firm grounding. My kid who is not going into physics and isn’t particularly strong in it worked hard but not crazy, got a B+ and a 760 on the SAT 2, and was not self teaching. |
And they didn’t lose a bright student. Check with him in June. They had a kid who took too high and level and was returned to the right level. I expect he got a decent grade in honors without tutoring and a strong grounding in physics. The issue is they need to stop letting kids without the background try and then actively weeding. |
PP here -Yes, but the fact that they even mentioned TJ in the school's email is more than the nothingness we received. Heck, they still don't even mention in that there is an honor roll. I get emails separately from the teacher running it and my child gets a notice in homeroom. If your child is not on the honor roll, you don't even know it's available and something for kids to reach for. |
It is indeed Physics. This kid got A at the end and scored 5 in AP Physics C. He said the AP test was not bad. But he does not like Physics and just glad it was over. Obviously he won't be pursuing anything in Physics, although I see a tremendous talent. That is what I meant by losing a bright student in the STEM field. |
I guess. But he made that choice. TJ is very clear with kids and parents during registration. AP Physics requires self teaching BC over the summer. It requires twice the work of Physics 1. And here’s the thing. It doesn’t cover physics as well. TJ doesn’t offer an AP in physics before C precisely because they designed their own curriculum in Physics 1 that does not directly track AP. It’s considered on of the best in the world, and they regularly train educators from around the world on their Physics 1 curriculum. DH has a physics minor undergrad and does high level Calc and was very impressed with the grounding of Physics 1. And the teaching. (As a note, they do the exact same thing in geosystems. Mandatory senior class, requires bio, chem, Physics and Calc, taught as state of the art to teachers around the world). The suggested track is Physics 1 to AP. But kids and parents get caught up in the academic arms race and quest for MIT, and extra AP, and many end up miserable. I sound hard hearted. But after 4 years of TJ, I am done with parents who insist their kid overaccelerate at an already challenging school and then gripe about the kids being miserable. Skip test this, self study and petition out of that. Not follow the recommended path here. Kids can do that. But it should not be on TJ when the kids are miserable and struggle. Because they warn: if you do this, you will have 8-10 hours of homework a week (I just looked up the handout), have to self teach BC over the summer, and are likely to need to drop if if they don’t have BC already done and take Physics 1 first. OTHO— DS has a friend who went the AP route junior year and dropped down after the first test. Finished BC, back in AP this year and says it’s night and day better. She loves the class (Engineering kid). Right about now, freaked out I’m going to have to drop AP Physics messages are popping up on the TJ inter webs. Again. So predictable if parents would accept the tracking recommendations. |