IF YOU HAD A POWER to go BACK IN TIME and do ONE GOOD DEED what would that be?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’d go back in time and poison LBJ’s beer so he wouldn’t let our Soldiers die in Vietnam so his wife could make her millions off her MRE company that supplied MREs to the Army. He was such a cold blooded and shameful man.

I didn't know about that. Wow.

[Anonymous]

The 9-11 hijackers wouldn’t have made it on the planes. I had a relative in the pentagon.

[Anonymous]

Two chicks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'd go back as Pontius Pilate and not have Jesus crucified. That would really Change the progression of Christianity.

This is exactly what I would do too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'd go back as Pontius Pilate and not have Jesus crucified. That would really Change the progression of Christianity.

What if it would not?

[Anonymous]

I would have asked the Universe not to make my Mother's mother sick and die young. I never knew her, I was 6 months old when she got sick. I know my Mom missed her so much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'd go back as Pontius Pilate and not have Jesus crucified. That would really Change the progression of Christianity.

There wouldn't be Christianity, because it is based on his resurrection, not so much on his wisdom when alive, because there were others in antiquity with the same common sense/benevolent messages, e.g., Buddha.

Pp here. I'm not Christian so that was my reasoning too

Would you feel comfortable saying that about any other religious tradition? Not that you wish awful things had been done by some adherents, but it shouldn’t exist all?

Honestly going back and taking out Mohammed would really be quite positive but these type of anti Christian people are way to PC to ever use that example.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'd go back as Pontius Pilate and not have Jesus crucified. That would really Change the progression of Christianity.

There wouldn't be Christianity, because it is based on his resurrection, not so much on his wisdom when alive, because there were others in antiquity with the same common sense/benevolent messages, e.g., Buddha.

Pp here. I'm not Christian so that was my reasoning too

Would you feel comfortable saying that about any other religious tradition? Not that you wish awful things had been done by some adherents, but it shouldn’t exist all?

Honestly going back and taking out Mohammed would really be quite positive but these type of anti Christian people are way to PC to ever use that example.

All atheists would be happier if neither religion existed, or any other. The world would be a better place.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'd go back as Pontius Pilate and not have Jesus crucified. That would really Change the progression of Christianity.

There wouldn't be Christianity, because it is based on his resurrection, not so much on his wisdom when alive, because there were others in antiquity with the same common sense/benevolent messages, e.g., Buddha.

Pp here. I'm not Christian so that was my reasoning too

Would you feel comfortable saying that about any other religious tradition? Not that you wish awful things had been done by some adherents, but it shouldn’t exist all?

Honestly going back and taking out Mohammed would really be quite positive but these type of anti Christian people are way to PC to ever use that example.

All atheists would be happier if neither religion existed, or any other. The world would be a better place.

Yes, the world would be perfect because without religion nobody would ever fight about anything ever. It would just be Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot singing Kumbaya in a drum circle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'd go back as Pontius Pilate and not have Jesus crucified. That would really Change the progression of Christianity.

There wouldn't be Christianity, because it is based on his resurrection, not so much on his wisdom when alive, because there were others in antiquity with the same common sense/benevolent messages, e.g., Buddha.

Pp here. I'm not Christian so that was my reasoning too

Would you feel comfortable saying that about any other religious tradition? Not that you wish awful things had been done by some adherents, but it shouldn’t exist all?

Honestly going back and taking out Mohammed would really be quite positive but these type of anti Christian people are way to PC to ever use that example.

All atheists would be happier if neither religion existed, or any other. The world would be a better place.

Yes, the world would be perfect because without religion nobody would ever fight about anything ever. It would just be Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot singing Kumbaya in a drum circle.

No, not perfect. But better.

[Anonymous]

Thanks. I'm convinced now. This was clearly a productive use of our time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thanks. I'm convinced now. This was clearly a productive use of our time.

I feel good about it. Why don't you?

[Anonymous]

In honor of Columbus Day, I would stop him from setting sail for the new world and I would tell the native american's that they must stop the white man at all costs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thanks. I'm convinced now. This was clearly a productive use of our time.

I feel good about it. Why don't you?

Your arguments are facetious and if you thought about it critically you would admit it. Nobody actually gains knowledge from trading barbs of facetious snark. It's just a waste of time getting a useless dopamine rush screwing around on the internet. Which is a waste of my time so I need to learn the discipline to just stop engaging with idiocy.

I don't blame you for making dumb argument to try to provoke an argument. It's just a thing humans do. But I do blame myself for engaging.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thanks. I'm convinced now. This was clearly a productive use of our time.

I feel good about it. Why don't you?

Your arguments are facetious and if you thought about it critically you would admit it. Nobody actually gains knowledge from trading barbs of facetious snark. It's just a waste of time getting a useless dopamine rush screwing around on the internet. Which is a waste of my time so I need to learn the discipline to just stop engaging with idiocy.

I don't blame you for making dumb argument to try to provoke an argument. It's just a thing humans do. But I do blame myself for engaging.

Not trying to provoke an argument. Just offering my opinion. Sorry you don't care for that. I will point out that if you think this is a waste of time you have an ironic way of showing that.