ECNL & DA Nationals Results

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Sorry but the Mid Atlantic did not actually fair very well in comparison to other conferences. Yes, VDA 06 and McLean 18/19. Both lost in the finals pretty bad, 0:5 and 1:4 respectively.

The Mid Atlantic only has two other teams in all the age groups reach the Quarter Finals, Richmond and Carolina Elite 04's. Both teams lost in the Quarters.

The most represented Conference's in the Quarter Finals U14-U17 was the Mid West and South West, and North East with 6 teams respectively.

Number of Quarter-finalist represented by Conference:
North East 6
Mid West 6
South West 6
Ohio- 4
South East - 3
North West 2
Mid Atlantic 2
Texas - 1

Number of Semi-Finalist represented by Conference:
North East 5
South West 4
Mid West 2
Ohio 2
South East 2

Let's stop acting like the Mid Atlantic is some crucible of the ECNL.

I don't have time to go through a verify all of your stats but since in your second sentence you can't even report the score of a game correctly (McLean lost 3-1), I have doubts about the accuracy of your numbers.

Right, McLean BEAT Ohio Premier 4-1. Dislexia.

Regardless. The rest of the numbers are sound. The Mid Atlantic U14-U17 was represented by only 2 teams at the Quarter Final level.

This is not to knock the U19 McLean team or VDA's achievements to reach the finals but when you look at the representation of the other Conferences it is very clear that across the board the Mid Atlantic is a weak Conference.

Did you take into account that some divisions allow more teams to qualify than others? For example, 5 NE teams qualify per age group vs 4 MA teams. Doesnt sound like a lot but that 4 more teams if you are taking overall division performance into account.

You also need to take into account the strength of the clubs in difference areas. PDA and Stars in the NE are getting their fair share. Always have and always will. World Class will be a powerhouse next year with the absorption of NYCFC. In other divisions, Hawks, Eclipse, Slammers, Blues, Vadar, etc will get their fair share in every age group.

Point being, your numbers may be right but your analysis is wrong.

There are about 10 top tier national clubs in the US. The rest of us are trying to dethrone them in any particular age group.

Point being none of the teams in the bolded above are in the Mid Atlantic. There is no Mid Atlantic power club. That is why the Conference is weak. Thanks for making my point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:128 teams Qualify across 4 age groups.

32 teams reach the Quarter Finals of which 18 teams, HALF the Quarter Finals were represented by 3 conferences out a total of 8.

No the mid Atlantic is not competitive.

Name the club and age group you are associated with.

If not, STFU and sit down.

How would that change the facts?

Because I'm going to do stats on their stats so we compare stats vs stats. Dont be an instigator and then run away when its go time.

I ask again. What club and age group are you associated with

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Sorry but the Mid Atlantic did not actually fair very well in comparison to other conferences. Yes, VDA 06 and McLean 18/19. Both lost in the finals pretty bad, 0:5 and 1:4 respectively.

The Mid Atlantic only has two other teams in all the age groups reach the Quarter Finals, Richmond and Carolina Elite 04's. Both teams lost in the Quarters.

The most represented Conference's in the Quarter Finals U14-U17 was the Mid West and South West, and North East with 6 teams respectively.

Number of Quarter-finalist represented by Conference:
North East 6
Mid West 6
South West 6
Ohio- 4
South East - 3
North West 2
Mid Atlantic 2
Texas - 1

Number of Semi-Finalist represented by Conference:
North East 5
South West 4
Mid West 2
Ohio 2
South East 2

Let's stop acting like the Mid Atlantic is some crucible of the ECNL.

I don't have time to go through a verify all of your stats but since in your second sentence you can't even report the score of a game correctly (McLean lost 3-1), I have doubts about the accuracy of your numbers.

Right, McLean BEAT Ohio Premier 4-1. Dislexia.

Regardless. The rest of the numbers are sound. The Mid Atlantic U14-U17 was represented by only 2 teams at the Quarter Final level.

This is not to knock the U19 McLean team or VDA's achievements to reach the finals but when you look at the representation of the other Conferences it is very clear that across the board the Mid Atlantic is a weak Conference.

Did you take into account that some divisions allow more teams to qualify than others? For example, 5 NE teams qualify per age group vs 4 MA teams. Doesnt sound like a lot but that 4 more teams if you are taking overall division performance into account.

You also need to take into account the strength of the clubs in difference areas. PDA and Stars in the NE are getting their fair share. Always have and always will. World Class will be a powerhouse next year with the absorption of NYCFC. In other divisions, Hawks, Eclipse, Slammers, Blues, Vadar, etc will get their fair share in every age group.

Point being, your numbers may be right but your analysis is wrong.

There are about 10 top tier national clubs in the US. The rest of us are trying to dethrone them in any particular age group.

Point being none of the teams in the bolded above are in the Mid Atlantic. There is no Mid Atlantic power club. That is why the Conference is weak. Thanks for making my point.

How many national titles did FCV have before they left?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:128 teams Qualify across 4 age groups.

32 teams reach the Quarter Finals of which 18 teams, HALF the Quarter Finals were represented by 3 conferences out a total of 8.

No the mid Atlantic is not competitive.

Name the club and age group you are associated with.

If not, STFU and sit down.

How would that change the facts?

Because I'm going to do stats on their stats so we compare stats vs stats. Dont be an instigator and then run away when its go time.

I ask again. What club and age group are you associated with

Feel free to do any comparative analysis you feel is necessary, it still won't change the facts of the Mid Atlantic ECNL Conference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Sorry but the Mid Atlantic did not actually fair very well in comparison to other conferences. Yes, VDA 06 and McLean 18/19. Both lost in the finals pretty bad, 0:5 and 1:4 respectively.

The Mid Atlantic only has two other teams in all the age groups reach the Quarter Finals, Richmond and Carolina Elite 04's. Both teams lost in the Quarters.

The most represented Conference's in the Quarter Finals U14-U17 was the Mid West and South West, and North East with 6 teams respectively.

Number of Quarter-finalist represented by Conference:
North East 6
Mid West 6
South West 6
Ohio- 4
South East - 3
North West 2
Mid Atlantic 2
Texas - 1

Number of Semi-Finalist represented by Conference:
North East 5
South West 4
Mid West 2
Ohio 2
South East 2

Let's stop acting like the Mid Atlantic is some crucible of the ECNL.

I don't have time to go through a verify all of your stats but since in your second sentence you can't even report the score of a game correctly (McLean lost 3-1), I have doubts about the accuracy of your numbers.

Right, McLean BEAT Ohio Premier 4-1. Dislexia.

Regardless. The rest of the numbers are sound. The Mid Atlantic U14-U17 was represented by only 2 teams at the Quarter Final level.

This is not to knock the U19 McLean team or VDA's achievements to reach the finals but when you look at the representation of the other Conferences it is very clear that across the board the Mid Atlantic is a weak Conference.

Did you take into account that some divisions allow more teams to qualify than others? For example, 5 NE teams qualify per age group vs 4 MA teams. Doesnt sound like a lot but that 4 more teams if you are taking overall division performance into account.

You also need to take into account the strength of the clubs in difference areas. PDA and Stars in the NE are getting their fair share. Always have and always will. World Class will be a powerhouse next year with the absorption of NYCFC. In other divisions, Hawks, Eclipse, Slammers, Blues, Vadar, etc will get their fair share in every age group.

Point being, your numbers may be right but your analysis is wrong.

There are about 10 top tier national clubs in the US. The rest of us are trying to dethrone them in any particular age group.

Point being none of the teams in the bolded above are in the Mid Atlantic. There is no Mid Atlantic power club. That is why the Conference is weak. Thanks for making my point.

How many national titles did FCV have before they left?

Did FCV play in the Mid Atlantic?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Sorry but the Mid Atlantic did not actually fair very well in comparison to other conferences. Yes, VDA 06 and McLean 18/19. Both lost in the finals pretty bad, 0:5 and 1:4 respectively.

The Mid Atlantic only has two other teams in all the age groups reach the Quarter Finals, Richmond and Carolina Elite 04's. Both teams lost in the Quarters.

The most represented Conference's in the Quarter Finals U14-U17 was the Mid West and South West, and North East with 6 teams respectively.

Number of Quarter-finalist represented by Conference:
North East 6
Mid West 6
South West 6
Ohio- 4
South East - 3
North West 2
Mid Atlantic 2
Texas - 1

Number of Semi-Finalist represented by Conference:
North East 5
South West 4
Mid West 2
Ohio 2
South East 2

Let's stop acting like the Mid Atlantic is some crucible of the ECNL.

I don't have time to go through a verify all of your stats but since in your second sentence you can't even report the score of a game correctly (McLean lost 3-1), I have doubts about the accuracy of your numbers.

Right, McLean BEAT Ohio Premier 4-1. Dislexia.

Regardless. The rest of the numbers are sound. The Mid Atlantic U14-U17 was represented by only 2 teams at the Quarter Final level.

This is not to knock the U19 McLean team or VDA's achievements to reach the finals but when you look at the representation of the other Conferences it is very clear that across the board the Mid Atlantic is a weak Conference.

Did you take into account that some divisions allow more teams to qualify than others? For example, 5 NE teams qualify per age group vs 4 MA teams. Doesnt sound like a lot but that 4 more teams if you are taking overall division performance into account.

You also need to take into account the strength of the clubs in difference areas. PDA and Stars in the NE are getting their fair share. Always have and always will. World Class will be a powerhouse next year with the absorption of NYCFC. In other divisions, Hawks, Eclipse, Slammers, Blues, Vadar, etc will get their fair share in every age group.

Point being, your numbers may be right but your analysis is wrong.

There are about 10 top tier national clubs in the US. The rest of us are trying to dethrone them in any particular age group.

Point being none of the teams in the bolded above are in the Mid Atlantic. There is no Mid Atlantic power club. That is why the Conference is weak. Thanks for making my point.

How many national titles did FCV have before they left?

Did FCV play in the Mid Atlantic?

You dont know this and yet youre offering opinions?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Sorry but the Mid Atlantic did not actually fair very well in comparison to other conferences. Yes, VDA 06 and McLean 18/19. Both lost in the finals pretty bad, 0:5 and 1:4 respectively.

The Mid Atlantic only has two other teams in all the age groups reach the Quarter Finals, Richmond and Carolina Elite 04's. Both teams lost in the Quarters.

The most represented Conference's in the Quarter Finals U14-U17 was the Mid West and South West, and North East with 6 teams respectively.

Number of Quarter-finalist represented by Conference:
North East 6
Mid West 6
South West 6
Ohio- 4
South East - 3
North West 2
Mid Atlantic 2
Texas - 1

Number of Semi-Finalist represented by Conference:
North East 5
South West 4
Mid West 2
Ohio 2
South East 2

Let's stop acting like the Mid Atlantic is some crucible of the ECNL.

I don't have time to go through a verify all of your stats but since in your second sentence you can't even report the score of a game correctly (McLean lost 3-1), I have doubts about the accuracy of your numbers.

Right, McLean BEAT Ohio Premier 4-1. Dislexia.

Regardless. The rest of the numbers are sound. The Mid Atlantic U14-U17 was represented by only 2 teams at the Quarter Final level.

This is not to knock the U19 McLean team or VDA's achievements to reach the finals but when you look at the representation of the other Conferences it is very clear that across the board the Mid Atlantic is a weak Conference.

Did you take into account that some divisions allow more teams to qualify than others? For example, 5 NE teams qualify per age group vs 4 MA teams. Doesnt sound like a lot but that 4 more teams if you are taking overall division performance into account.

You also need to take into account the strength of the clubs in difference areas. PDA and Stars in the NE are getting their fair share. Always have and always will. World Class will be a powerhouse next year with the absorption of NYCFC. In other divisions, Hawks, Eclipse, Slammers, Blues, Vadar, etc will get their fair share in every age group.

Point being, your numbers may be right but your analysis is wrong.

There are about 10 top tier national clubs in the US. The rest of us are trying to dethrone them in any particular age group.

Point being none of the teams in the bolded above are in the Mid Atlantic. There is no Mid Atlantic power club. That is why the Conference is weak. Thanks for making my point.

How many national titles did FCV have before they left?

Did FCV play in the Mid Atlantic?

You dont know this and yet youre offering opinions?

The Mid Atlantic is a weak ECNL conference.

The answer is no FCV did not play in the Mid Atlantic. The conferences were realigned after the DA came online. The discussion is about the Mid Atlantic as a conference as a whole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:128 teams Qualify across 4 age groups.

32 teams reach the Quarter Finals of which 18 teams, HALF the Quarter Finals were represented by 3 conferences out a total of 8.

No the mid Atlantic is not competitive.

Name the club and age group you are associated with.

If not, STFU and sit down.

How would that change the facts?

Because I'm going to do stats on their stats so we compare stats vs stats. Dont be an instigator and then run away when its go time.

I ask again. What club and age group are you associated with

Feel free to do any comparative analysis you feel is necessary, it still won't change the facts of the Mid Atlantic ECNL Conference.

And there you have it people. The poster can throw punches but cant take a hit.

[Anonymous]

FCV played in the Chesapeake Division in the MidAtlantic conference.

One of the Mid-Atlantic Conference clubs was ranked in the top 10 ECNL Overall Club Standings at the conclusion of the 2015-16 ECNL Season, with two more Mid-Atlantic Conference clubs ranking in the top 25 ECNL Overall Club Standings.

9th – Ohio Premier
20th – FC Virginia
21st – CASL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:128 teams Qualify across 4 age groups.

32 teams reach the Quarter Finals of which 18 teams, HALF the Quarter Finals were represented by 3 conferences out a total of 8.

No the mid Atlantic is not competitive.

Name the club and age group you are associated with.

If not, STFU and sit down.

How would that change the facts?

Because I'm going to do stats on their stats so we compare stats vs stats. Dont be an instigator and then run away when its go time.

I ask again. What club and age group are you associated with

Feel free to do any comparative analysis you feel is necessary, it still won't change the facts of the Mid Atlantic ECNL Conference.

And there you have it people. The poster can throw punches but cant take a hit.

Feel free to compare to DA, NPL, EDP, Super Y. Anything you wish. You don't need permission or approval. It isn't about being able to take a punch. Go ahead. But how will any of it make the Mid Atlantic a strong conference within ECNL?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FCV played in the Chesapeake Division in the MidAtlantic conference.

One of the Mid-Atlantic Conference clubs was ranked in the top 10 ECNL Overall Club Standings at the conclusion of the 2015-16 ECNL Season, with two more Mid-Atlantic Conference clubs ranking in the top 25 ECNL Overall Club Standings.

9th – Ohio Premier
20th – FC Virginia
21st – CASL

And what other clubs were in that conference before DA and the overall realignment?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:128 teams Qualify across 4 age groups.

32 teams reach the Quarter Finals of which 18 teams, HALF the Quarter Finals were represented by 3 conferences out a total of 8.

No the mid Atlantic is not competitive.

Name the club and age group you are associated with.

If not, STFU and sit down.

How would that change the facts?

Because I'm going to do stats on their stats so we compare stats vs stats. Dont be an instigator and then run away when its go time.

I ask again. What club and age group are you associated with

Feel free to do any comparative analysis you feel is necessary, it still won't change the facts of the Mid Atlantic ECNL Conference.

And there you have it people. The poster can throw punches but cant take a hit.

Feel free to compare to DA, NPL, EDP, Super Y. Anything you wish. You don't need permission or approval. It isn't about being able to take a punch. Go ahead. But how will any of it make the Mid Atlantic a strong conference within ECNL?

It's not strong compared to what? The rest of the nation? Local options? If so, your analysis needs to go way deeper. You're being lazy and cherry picking low hanging fruit.

I don't recall a single poster saying the MA divsion was a powerhouse. You are just super emotional and went on a stat splurge which tells me that you have an agenda.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FCV played in the Chesapeake Division in the MidAtlantic conference.

One of the Mid-Atlantic Conference clubs was ranked in the top 10 ECNL Overall Club Standings at the conclusion of the 2015-16 ECNL Season, with two more Mid-Atlantic Conference clubs ranking in the top 25 ECNL Overall Club Standings.

9th – Ohio Premier
20th – FC Virginia
21st – CASL

And what other clubs were in that conference before DA and the overall realignment?

OP is still ECNL.

HOW MANY NATIONAL TITLES DOES FCV HAVE AS A CLUB?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FCV played in the Chesapeake Division in the MidAtlantic conference.

One of the Mid-Atlantic Conference clubs was ranked in the top 10 ECNL Overall Club Standings at the conclusion of the 2015-16 ECNL Season, with two more Mid-Atlantic Conference clubs ranking in the top 25 ECNL Overall Club Standings.

9th – Ohio Premier
20th – FC Virginia
21st – CASL

And what other clubs were in that conference before DA and the overall realignment?

OP is still ECNL.

HOW MANY NATIONAL TITLES DOES FCV HAVE AS A CLUB?

Is FCV in the current Mid Atlantic a Conference in ECNL? Is Ohio Premier?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:128 teams Qualify across 4 age groups.

32 teams reach the Quarter Finals of which 18 teams, HALF the Quarter Finals were represented by 3 conferences out a total of 8.

No the mid Atlantic is not competitive.

Name the club and age group you are associated with.

If not, STFU and sit down.

How would that change the facts?

Because I'm going to do stats on their stats so we compare stats vs stats. Dont be an instigator and then run away when its go time.

I ask again. What club and age group are you associated with

Feel free to do any comparative analysis you feel is necessary, it still won't change the facts of the Mid Atlantic ECNL Conference.

And there you have it people. The poster can throw punches but cant take a hit.

Feel free to compare to DA, NPL, EDP, Super Y. Anything you wish. You don't need permission or approval. It isn't about being able to take a punch. Go ahead. But how will any of it make the Mid Atlantic a strong conference within ECNL?

It's not strong compared to what? The rest of the nation? Local options? If so, your analysis needs to go way deeper. You're being lazy and cherry picking low hanging fruit.

I don't recall a single poster saying the MA divsion was a powerhouse. You are just super emotional and went on a stat splurge which tells me that you have an agenda.

It is pretty obvious that the Mid Atlantic comparison is within ECNL. By ECNL standards and by National Championship quarter finals representation compared to other conference it is a weak conference.