About same as Brent |
Spots at Latin are total crapshoot without sib priority and BASIS is not everyone's cup of tea. Lots of families looking at wider range if options. Demographically this is only the tip of the iceberg. Wait 4 years |
How can SWS be a “super white” school in a citywide school? Aren’t there a significant number of nonwhites that apply to the school in the lottery? Even if it is predominantly White, don’t they teach all students well with the Reggio method—especially those that start at preK? |
It's in a neighborhood that is increasingly white and wealthy, far from many commuter routes. They do little outreach to low-income neighborhoods. Most of the kids who are admitted have siblings already in the school, slowing any effort to diversify. The Reggio model is also probably more popular with highly-educated higher-income people who are ok with a school that looks a bit more chaotic--no uniforms, lots of messy play, questioning authority in ways that may appear disrespectful, lots of projects and field trips rather than what looks like formal learning to folks who grew up with a more traditional education. |
SWS is becoming less white in early grades as older sibling dominance wanes, unlike Brent which is becoming even more white. Wait til 2018-19 SY numbers are released. |
| This whole discussion is so tired. My kids have gone to one of the less desirable cap hill elementary schools for the past 4 years and guess what - its been great. I won't lie and say its been perfect but when we finally "won" the lottery and had the option to switch we declined. Most of the people on this board have little to no recent experience with most of these schools and have no idea what they are talking about. |
SWS is still pretty white. The number of non-white children in ECE classes really varies by year -depending on how many siblings and just luck of the draw. Some years there are more black kids and some years less. You can't yet say that each entering class is less white because that's not been true so far - ask the admin. |
don't need to ask. some of the sibling preferences are gradually balancing out racial disparity as AA kids in ECE get sibling priority just like white kids. |
I feel like DME needs to send in a researcher - McKinsey type, or a PhD, somebody with a social science bent, to figure out how the highest demand, nominally citywide schools keep ending up being whiter and richer than the city. |
What is so hard to understand? If you do not have a car and have an elementary student, it takes a lot of work to get to SWS from outside of Ward 6. So you don’t put it on your list. You go with your IB or a more convenient charter. It is school choice and charters have made schools like SWS and CHML not the only game in town if you do not like your IB. |
We got in a few years ago and declined for this reason. I think it’s a great school if your child has special needs. Otherwise there are better options. |
For more history lesson -- SWS was literally housed within Peabody. For preschool, inbound (mostly white) parents could choose SWS, Peabody or Montessori (which I think was at Watkins?). Neighborhood parents picked SWS, and it was super white. Peabody had mostly black children. In the same building! Not great. Anyway, maybe PPs are right that the school will be less white when the founding families and siblings age out. |
They don't have your kid's PARCC scores if you opted out. We opt out at an EotP school every year without difficulty. The reality is that Cap HIll parents are starting to behave more like WotP parents. Opting out of a bad test making money for super rich Pearson executives and shareholders isn't unusual in Upper NW. As for SWS becoming more "diverse." Yes, the school is becoming more internationally diverse, with more UMC parents from Europe, Canada/Mexico, South America, Asia, Australia and even Africa turning up every year. Boo to "diversity" merely being a mix AAs and whites. |
^^ nice story but not really true. Certainly no more than other DC public schools |
That's absurd. In the micro-geography of the Hill, concerns about diversity are very much tied into concerns about gentrification and the giant wealth gap right on our blocks, so it absolutely means African Americans. I'm glad for more international diversity too (as well as the increasing number of mixed race and black UMC families I see on the Hill) but let's not pretend. |