Lori Loughlin's DAUGHTER is under criminal investigation in college admissions scandal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes! I am cackling with glee. Throw the book at them. What strivers! Shoot for the moon and if you fail, at least hire a good lawyer

Who is LL lawyer? Apologies if it was already mentioned.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes! I am cackling with glee. Throw the book at them. What strivers! Shoot for the moon and if you fail, at least hire a good lawyer

Who is LL lawyer? Apologies if it was already mentioned.

Lori is getting bad legal advice or not following good legal advice.

[Anonymous]

A parent of a junior.

My kid can not bribe her way in but l think all this is a distraction.

Some of it is overkill & becoming a waste of tax payer funds.

No I don't sympathise with these characters.

If colleges were not rigging and complicating the admissions process we might not be here.

Some of the DCUM posts are a reflection of this bizarre lottery to get kids into College.

The whole college admissions process is becoming this weird process and our kids are getting to breaking point trying to make themselves better than their peer to get a spot.

Ends of morning rant, back to supporting exhausted ambitious kid.

[Anonymous]

If your kid has worked hard in HS, is college ready and is motivated to go to college, your kid will get into college.

It's the parents of the kids who have played their entire academic career, cheated on tests and otherwise not taken school seriously who are pulling these last minute Hail Mary stunts for their kids. It's shameful and it's really, really sad. Their kids basically grow up learning how to cheat the rules to get stuff.

What Loughlin and her husband did to their daughters is just criminal. If those girls turn around and sue their parents for all they've got that would not surprise me in the least. That's the type of kids that these parents have raised.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A parent of a junior.

My kid can not bribe her way in but l think all this is a distraction.

Some of it is overkill & becoming a waste of tax payer funds.

No I don't sympathise with these characters.

If colleges were not rigging and complicating the admissions process we might not be here.

Some of the DCUM posts are a reflection of this bizarre lottery to get kids into College.

The whole college admissions process is becoming this weird process and our kids are getting to breaking point trying to make themselves better than their peer to get a spot.

Ends of morning rant, back to supporting exhausted ambitious kid.

LL and co broke the law. You can try to make a case that the laws shouldn't exist. But it's not a waste of taxpayer funds to enforce laws. It's illegal to bribe your way into school and take an enormous tax writeoff for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When is the US Attorney / FBI going after Jared Kushner and dad, and Harvard and NYU Law School?

As soon as what they do is illegal.

You don’t think daddy wrote off those multi million quid pro quo donations to Harvard and NYU on his taxes?

To be clear, I dislike them immensely. But, not illegal.

If you can't understand the difference with the mountain of facts about both situations, including an entire book written about development admits 20 years ago or so, I really don't think I can explain to you why.

DP. Many immoral things are and have been legal throughout history. Universities should be held to a higher standard.

Strawman argument.

I'll tell you who likes development admits: NOBODY.

There's a reason it is done -- for every one of those undeserving development admits, many other kids get opportunities they would not otherwise have. It sucks on an individual basis, but overall, society is better for it.

That's how universities DO hold themselves up to a higher standard.

You keep telling yourself that, but in Europe and Asia, there are no development admits. Yup, LSE turned down a billionaire's daughter.

You are extremely naive if you think Europe and Asia are bastions of meritocracy with the rich and powerful having no advantage.

+1 I went to high school with a certain royal that was on all aspects pretty dumb. When a Cambridge professor looked at his stats he was like no way this guy is getting in. The British foreign service placed a call in to Cambridge, guess where this royal went?

Middlebury?

Touché.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems they’re making an example out of Loughlins. Gentile bias, I fear.

LL made her bed when she wouldn’t deal. The facts and evidence to charge were always there. In order to get rid of the case and move things along, they were offered the opportunity to plead to the minimum. They rejected the deal. So if the government is going to have to try the case, of course the government is going to try their entire case.

And for anyone who thinks this is going to be a walk in the park, that is not how things go with federal charges. The idea that they can plead ignorance isn’t going to work.

I think the biggest miscalculation was their failure to realize that the feds would bring her daughter (and maybe both of them) into the web. After cooking up this scheme, they could have done better by their kids by accepting a deal and keeping their kids out of it.

I’m sure for the rich it doesn’t mean much to have a federal conviction on their record. But for the rest of us, it would be life changing.

She may be better off taking her chances. They are targeting her to make an example out of her but over 30 families were involved and we're not hearing about each and every one of them, so whats really going on and what's this really about? Is it really worth putting someone like her in jail for a non-violent crime? Give her a huge fine and probation and community service. Waste of money otherwise.

They are also, likely, having the book thrown at them. It's just that they aren't D-list celebrities, so no one is reporting on them.

[Anonymous]

Now, based on a report by Us Weekly, it looks like both Lori and Mossimo will be audited by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

[Anonymous]

Easy case of conspiracy based on publicly revealed info, just for starters.

IIRC, she knew (unlike F Huffman'skid), what was going on.

I say prosecute her.

Signed,

Former Federal LE attorney / Criminal defense attorney / former judge

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why LL didn’t anticipate this when she refused a plea deal.

Entitlement. Hollywood scum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now, based on a report by Us Weekly, it looks like both Lori and Mossimo will be audited by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

Well, I would hope the IRS would audit them both. Don't worry Lori, it's "just" the IRS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A parent of a junior.

My kid can not bribe her way in but l think all this is a distraction.

Some of it is overkill & becoming a waste of tax payer funds.

No I don't sympathise with these characters.

If colleges were not rigging and complicating the admissions process we might not be here.

Some of the DCUM posts are a reflection of this bizarre lottery to get kids into College.

The whole college admissions process is becoming this weird process and our kids are getting to breaking point trying to make themselves better than their peer to get a spot.

Ends of morning rant, back to supporting exhausted ambitious kid.

LL and co broke the law. You can try to make a case that the laws shouldn't exist. But it's not a waste of taxpayer funds to enforce laws. It's illegal to bribe your way into school and take an enormous tax writeoff for it.

As far as I know (correct me if I'm wrong) she and her husband are charged with conspiracy to commit fraud and money laundering, not tax evasion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A parent of a junior.

My kid can not bribe her way in but l think all this is a distraction.

Some of it is overkill & becoming a waste of tax payer funds.

No I don't sympathise with these characters.

If colleges were not rigging and complicating the admissions process we might not be here.

Some of the DCUM posts are a reflection of this bizarre lottery to get kids into College.

The whole college admissions process is becoming this weird process and our kids are getting to breaking point trying to make themselves better than their peer to get a spot.

Ends of morning rant, back to supporting exhausted ambitious kid.

LL and co broke the law. You can try to make a case that the laws shouldn't exist. But it's not a waste of taxpayer funds to enforce laws. It's illegal to bribe your way into school and take an enormous tax writeoff for it.

As far as I know (correct me if I'm wrong) she and her husband are charged with conspiracy to commit fraud and money laundering, not tax evasion.

I'm guessing an audit will fix that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A parent of a junior.

My kid can not bribe her way in but l think all this is a distraction.

Some of it is overkill & becoming a waste of tax payer funds.

No I don't sympathise with these characters.

If colleges were not rigging and complicating the admissions process we might not be here.

Some of the DCUM posts are a reflection of this bizarre lottery to get kids into College.

The whole college admissions process is becoming this weird process and our kids are getting to breaking point trying to make themselves better than their peer to get a spot.

Ends of morning rant, back to supporting exhausted ambitious kid.

LL and co broke the law. You can try to make a case that the laws shouldn't exist. But it's not a waste of taxpayer funds to enforce laws. It's illegal to bribe your way into school and take an enormous tax writeoff for it.

As far as I know (correct me if I'm wrong) she and her husband are charged with conspiracy to commit fraud and money laundering, not tax evasion.

I'm guessing an audit will fix that.

I was responding to the bolded which doesn't even address what she's being charged with. Bribing you way into college isn't illegal, and while taking a tax write-off for it should be illegal, she's not being charged with that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A parent of a junior.

My kid can not bribe her way in but l think all this is a distraction.

Some of it is overkill & becoming a waste of tax payer funds.

No I don't sympathise with these characters.

If colleges were not rigging and complicating the admissions process we might not be here.

Some of the DCUM posts are a reflection of this bizarre lottery to get kids into College.

The whole college admissions process is becoming this weird process and our kids are getting to breaking point trying to make themselves better than their peer to get a spot.

Ends of morning rant, back to supporting exhausted ambitious kid.

LL and co broke the law. You can try to make a case that the laws shouldn't exist. But it's not a waste of taxpayer funds to enforce laws. It's illegal to bribe your way into school and take an enormous tax writeoff for it.

As far as I know (correct me if I'm wrong) she and her husband are charged with conspiracy to commit fraud and money laundering, not tax evasion.

I'm guessing an audit will fix that.

IRS criminal investigators are not always brought into the case right away because they are overworked and stretched thin. My guess is the prosecutors were hoping LL would plead guilty to the other charges, making the IRS-CI help unnecessary. Now that LL is fighting, they are bringing in IRS-CI and will end up filing a superseding indictment that includes a tax charge. Would expect that to take maybe 6 months.