| Yes, my theater kid is really disappointed she will graduate before this happens. But these talented kids laid the groundwork for those that will follow. The WJ performing artists should be really proud of themselves, as should VAC kids at Einstein. They make us proud! |
|
How about focusing on relieving the overcrowding at WJ, Einstein and Blair. Northwood has an upcoming expansion or I would have included them.
Move many adjacent WJ neighborhoods to Woodward, Move the SMACS and CAPs program from Blair to Woodward, move adjacent Einstein neighborhoods to Woodward and a few to Blair Einstein is still overcrowded and Woodward is full. Capacity addressed at WJ, Einstein and Blair. Woodward filled. Expedite the Northwood expansion. Done. |
1+ |
I disagree that it's "just an idea." Forming an exploratory committee headed by the former head of Strathmore is not "just an idea." They may keep VAC at Einstein and make it performing arts at Woodward, but I agree with PP that MCPS has decided to do this and the "community input" going forward will be a dog and pony show. |
Wow, math is so easy when you don't use numbers! |
| Do not underestimate what music and the arts can do for a kid or a community. |
|
" I agree with PP that MCPS has decided to do this and the "community input" going forward will be a dog and pony show."
+1000 |
MCPS doesn't ask for community input, DCUM responds: "MCPS didn't ask for community input!" MCPS asks for community input, DCUM responds: "This is a dog and pony show! The fix is in!" |
| Ummm they’ve been getting community input on the performing arts magnet for awhile now. |
+1 I personally put in feedback on this option at least 18 months ago, when they sent around a survey about what to do with Woodward. I also wrote it into another survey about school choices and magnets. |
| +1000 |
Yep. Me too. And I specifically asked for a performing arts magnet. |
This is true. They did solicit feedback a couple years ago, and I did provide comments. But they never presented any summary or conclusion from the comments (I'm not sure they ever actually released the "working group" results, but a "decision" on programming certainly didn't seem to be part of it. Now it does seem that MCPS has made a decision. So I acknowledge there was input, but it was quite a while ago and it didn't seem to result in any conclusion being reached by MCPS until now, when many parents have forgotten it happened or weren't in the schools then. |
Agreed, I smell a possible troll or instigator. I’m more focused on relieving crowding than this nonsense. |
I know DCUM skews young and UMC, but the survey was only two years ago. Maybe less. Not THAT many parents who are interested in high school programs were not yet in the system two years ago. I remember the survey pretty clearly because the options were intriguing. I personally supported a performing arts magnet because I have artsy kids but there was also a girls-only STEM program being pitched, which also sounded really fascinating. |