Hat tip to Trump for his unassailable SCOTUS pick

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Liberals loved it when Obama said elections have consequences.

Not so much now ...........

We meant legitimate elections free of foreign interference. Sorry that’s so hard for you.

It is actually damn hard to understand the hallucination that the Russians hacked the Electoral College. Maybe if you take your meds you can explain? I don't get it, but I don't have mental problems.

They still don't understand why they lost the election - it was the issues and the fact they had a god-awful candidate. But they can't bring themselves to admit it. So they hang on to other non-issues like Comey, the Russians, hacking and so on.

[Anonymous]

Treason is ok in the average Trumpster's mind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Liberals loved it when Obama said elections have consequences.

Not so much now ...........

We meant legitimate elections free of foreign interference. Sorry that’s so hard for you.

It is actually damn hard to understand the hallucination that the Russians hacked the Electoral College. Maybe if you take your meds you can explain? I don't get it, but I don't have mental problems.

It is just liberal frustration. They are losing out on every front and can't come to terms with it.

Endless media hits on Trump and he just blazes on ..... can you blame liberals for their rants?

Abortion rights will be the hill that Republicans die on. You will have lost women for generations.

Like demographics were going to doom the Republicans in 2016?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Liberals loved it when Obama said elections have consequences.

Not so much now ...........

We meant legitimate elections free of foreign interference. Sorry that’s so hard for you.

It is actually damn hard to understand the hallucination that the Russians hacked the Electoral College. Maybe if you take your meds you can explain? I don't get it, but I don't have mental problems.

They still don't understand why they lost the election - it was the issues and the fact they had a god-awful candidate. But they can't bring themselves to admit it. So they hang on to other non-issues like Comey, the Russians, hacking and so on.

I'm not trying to pick a fight with you. It just doesn't explain how the Russians could "hack" the election which is only doable vis-a-vis the Electoral College.

538 electors had to physically show up to cast their vote. And - this is significant - they can actually go against the majority of the voters of their district. In other words, even if the Russians "hacked" the voting totals of all 538 districts it is not sufficient to "hack" the election. The electors - chosen by their districts in independent processes" cast independent votes. In person.

Did the Russians create robots who so successfully resembled the electors that no-one noticed? Or is this loser bullsh*t?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Treason is ok in the average Trumpster's mind.

Treason lives in the imagination of liberals ........

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Treason is ok in the average Trumpster's mind.

Again with the hallucinations and not addressing the issues voters care about. Brava.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Liberals loved it when Obama said elections have consequences.

Not so much now ...........

We meant legitimate elections free of foreign interference. Sorry that’s so hard for you.

It is actually damn hard to understand the hallucination that the Russians hacked the Electoral College. Maybe if you take your meds you can explain? I don't get it, but I don't have mental problems.

It is just liberal frustration. They are losing out on every front and can't come to terms with it.

Endless media hits on Trump and he just blazes on ..... can you blame liberals for their rants?

Abortion rights will be the hill that Republicans die on. You will have lost women for generations.

Like demographics were going to doom the Republicans in 2016?

The bots seem to have come back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Liberals loved it when Obama said elections have consequences.

Not so much now ...........

We meant legitimate elections free of foreign interference. Sorry that’s so hard for you.

It is actually damn hard to understand the hallucination that the Russians hacked the Electoral College. Maybe if you take your meds you can explain? I don't get it, but I don't have mental problems.

You must be as dumb as a rock. Use google.

[Anonymous]

Susan Collins likes Kavanaugh apparently ....... game over?

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-nominee-kavanaugh-begins-lobbying-campaign-gop-senators-n890266

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Susan Collins likes Kavanaugh apparently ....... game over?

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-nominee-kavanaugh-begins-lobbying-campaign-gop-senators-n890266

Feckless ****.

[Anonymous]

Trump SCOTUS Finalist Wanted to Ask Bill Clinton Specific Questions About Things He Ejaculated On, Book Says

https://www.thewrap.com/trump-scotus-finalist-brett-kavanaugh-bill-clinton-questions-monica-lewinsky/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump SCOTUS Finalist Wanted to Ask Bill Clinton Specific Questions About Things He Ejaculated On, Book Says

https://www.thewrap.com/trump-scotus-finalist-brett-kavanaugh-bill-clinton-questions-monica-lewinsky/

So what?

[Anonymous]

He's going to be put in a perjury trap in the confirmation hearings:

"Did you leak any information to the media or break any disclosure laws while working for the Special Counsel?"
"Did you promise anything to the President as a condition of receiving this nomination?"
"Did the POTUS ask you for a loyalty pledge, similar to how he pressured former Director Comey?"
"Did the POTUS ask you to rule in a certain manner on future matters before the Court?"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump SCOTUS Finalist Wanted to Ask Bill Clinton Specific Questions About Things He Ejaculated On, Book Says

https://www.thewrap.com/trump-scotus-finalist-brett-kavanaugh-bill-clinton-questions-monica-lewinsky/

So what?

What legal relevance did those questions have, besides prurience? And why were questions like that appropriate for that President, yet he claimed in 2009 that Presidents shouldn’t even be the subjects of investigations?

[Anonymous]

Telling that Ed Meese was at the announcement. Balls deep in Iran-Contra. Corrupt as f*ck.