Kavanaugh will sail through. Sure we'll here lots of this and that, but it's a done deal. Collins, Murkowski, Manchin, etc will all confirm. Plus, he's actually a great pick. I dare anyone to come up with a plausible argument on why he should not be confirmed.
|
Aren't there already threads on this? |
I think this thread is the only positive one. |
OP here - agree there's profound negativity and, frankly hysteria, in the other posts. There's nothing negative to say about this guy if you're being rationale and not some deranged partisan. |
Before it turns hatefully negative, I agree with you. He was the safe pick with the least visible negatives for the democrats to gain traction, Should get the red state dem votes. They cannot afford not to. |
McConnell wasn't pushing for him for a reason. |
The other one created after the pick was discussing impeachment and hypothetical about his daughters. |
Did McConnell really say that or his competitors were jockeying positions? Out of the four, he is clearly the most qualified. |
Op, Putin is so glad you agree with his choice.
https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report |
How about: He's a right wing ideologue who worked for ideologue Ken Starr? Gorsuch voted to shred voting rights to ensconce minority Republican rule, and so will Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh benefits from right-wing affirmative action, as one of the few pro-billionaire law students in his class at Yale. (Yes, these apply to most all conservative judges. But guess what - most conservative judges are unqualified, hold wildly extreme views from the majority of the country and the majority of smart people who are not billionaire-supported, and don't deserve spots in any judgeship, never mind this one.) |
"Hysteria" is the last refuge of the modern conservative scoundrel. "Oh, people are upset that their rights will be taken away! That American oligarchs are achieving the plan they put in place in the 70s! That black and brown and poor people will suffer to benefit rich white people! That kids will be unnecessarily shot to feed identity politics that gets votes for Republicans! Hysteria!" |
Queue the drama queens. |
merrick Garland. Unassailable. |
Ooops......
Seems as if the “women’s march” folks pre-wrote their response slamming the SCOTUS pick, but forgot to go back and enter the name of the nominee, Pretty much exposes them for who they are........ ![]() Full response is printed in this article: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jul/9/womens-march-mocked-press-release-opposing-supreme/ |
....says the liberal. |