Hillary Has Not Ruled Out Contesting the Election -

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:what has been set up? her losing the electoral college so that we could go through the embarrassment and terror of agent orange being inaugurated only to have HRC become president through some legal move?

So, THIS makes sense to you?

seriously, trumpkins live in their own reality.

But anticipating an overthrow of Trump's presidency doesn't smack of some serious delusions? Talk about conspiracy theories - you guys take the cake.

....and that we're all paid Russians, too!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Playing with fire. If she opens up this box, Trump will order her prosecuted for alleged email matters.

Hardly. He will shaking in his boots about his impeachment and how he can pardon himself!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:what has been set up? her losing the electoral college so that we could go through the embarrassment and terror of agent orange being inaugurated only to have HRC become president through some legal move?

So, THIS makes sense to you?

seriously, trumpkins live in their own reality.

But anticipating an overthrow of Trump's presidency doesn't smack of some serious delusions? Talk about conspiracy theories - you guys take the cake.

he's doing a pretty damn good job of screwing it all up on his own.

impeachment and resignation are much more reasonable than whatever nonsense the PP is babbling about as a conspiracy theory with HRC being installed through relitigating the election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Still, I felt a responsibility to be there," she wrote about attending Trump's inauguration, no matter how painful. "The peaceful transfer of power is one of our country's most important traditions."

What transfer of power would she be a part of?

She was there as Bill Clinton's wife who happened to also be the candidate that didn't win the EC.

"Donald Trump is going to be our president. We owe him an open mind and the chance to lead. Our constitutional democracy enshrines the peaceful transfer of power," she said. "We don't just respect that. We cherish it."

But only for a number of weeks.

Yes, WJC did win the EC. He did not win a majority of the popular vote, but he did win the plurality of it. It is not the same situation.

I see where I wasn't clear...she was the wife of a former president and she was a candidate that didn't win the EC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:what has been set up? her losing the electoral college so that we could go through the embarrassment and terror of agent orange being inaugurated only to have HRC become president through some legal move?

So, THIS makes sense to you?

seriously, trumpkins live in their own reality.

They expected her to win. When she didn't, they all panicked because they knew how much deep crap they were in, including media, who have been colluding With him

[Anonymous]

Clinton is doing the Kremlin's work by sowing seeds of discord and mistrust. She got totally played.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Clinton is doing the Kremlin's work by sowing seeds of discord and mistrust. She got totally played.

Nice try, Vlad!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clinton is doing the Kremlin's work by sowing seeds of discord and mistrust. She got totally played.

Nice try, Vlad!

I agree with pp. She is not doing her party, nor the nation, any favors.
And, your little comment is old and stale.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clinton is doing the Kremlin's work by sowing seeds of discord and mistrust. She got totally played.

Nice try, Vlad!

I agree with pp. She is not doing her party, nor the nation, any favors.
And, your little comment is old and stale.

Let's say again: perhaps she has seen more than we have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clinton is doing the Kremlin's work by sowing seeds of discord and mistrust. She got totally played.

Nice try, Vlad!

I agree with pp. She is not doing her party, nor the nation, any favors.
And, your little comment is old and stale.

Let's say again: perhaps she has seen more than we have.

She has seen defeat. Twice. And, she is bitter.

[Anonymous]

What would be the harm in doing a recount? When people cast votes, we count them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What would be the harm in doing a recount? When people cast votes, we count them.

Been there, done that.
First strategy of the Dems to overturn the election. And, the recount actually produced more votes for Trump.
Once again, she is not helping her party or our country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:what has been set up? her losing the electoral college so that we could go through the embarrassment and terror of agent orange being inaugurated only to have HRC become president through some legal move?

So, THIS makes sense to you?

seriously, trumpkins live in their own reality.

They do, but we must remember that at this point most of these "Trumpkins" are Russians paid to post in support of him.

Exactly. Everyone who disagrees with you is a Russian!

I guess that means we have 60 million Russians in the U.S., eh?

If you say so!
https://www.vox.com/world/2017/5/19/15561842/trump-russia-louise-mensch

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clinton is doing the Kremlin's work by sowing seeds of discord and mistrust. She got totally played.

Nice try, Vlad!

I agree with pp. She is not doing her party, nor the nation, any favors.
And, your little comment is old and stale.

Let's say again: perhaps she has seen more than we have.

Yes, I'm sure that's it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clinton is doing the Kremlin's work by sowing seeds of discord and mistrust. She got totally played.

Nice try, Vlad!

I agree with pp. She is not doing her party, nor the nation, any favors.
And, your little comment is old and stale.

Let's say again: perhaps she has seen more than we have.

Yes, I'm sure that's it.

Q: I'm confused. When we talk about "Dreamers," I always thought they were the kids of illegals we have allowed to remain here. Could the real Dreamers be the liberals who keep going on about impeachment, dementia, Russia, racist, etc.?