John Podesta's good friend Peter Kadzik is in charge of Clinton email probe at DOJ

[Anonymous]

Really great Guardian article that sums up what these leaked emails illustrate about the 'elites' in power. If you're not in their club, you're screwed. If you're in the club, you get rich and stay protected. Admission to and advancement in the club isn't based on merit:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/31/the-podesta-emails-show-who-runs-america-and-how-they-do-it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow! I honestly don't know how anybody can defend this anymore.

We're not defending it. We're just saying we don't care.

Unitl it affects you and it will be too late?

You can still vote for Hillary, but to say that you don't care about this exposure of Washington corruption? That's crazy.

I don't think Hillary's supporters are crazy, they just ignorant. They don't read the orignial sources or different sources of information. They get their information from 1-2 sites that brainwashed them. And then they take an ostrich position "I don't care" becasue they don't have enough information to make an intelligent decision.

You may be right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow! I honestly don't know how anybody can defend this anymore.

We're not defending it. We're just saying we don't care.

Unitl it affects you and it will be too late?

You can still vote for Hillary, but to say that you don't care about this exposure of Washington corruption? That's crazy.

I don't think Hillary's supporters are crazy, they just ignorant. They don't read the orignial sources or different sources of information. They get their information from 1-2 sites that brainwashed them. And then they take an ostrich position "I don't care" becasue they don't have enough information to make an intelligent decision.

You may be right.

It wasn't a Hillary supporter pointing and screaming "Media Matters David Brock!" when someone pointed out that Kadzik is in no way "in charge of the email probe."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://www.npr.org/2016/10/31/500110247/white-house-wont-second-guess-fbi-directors-judgment

Look here is NPR - your favorite liberal source - confirming that Kadzik is in charge.

Now, step 2 - go to Wikileaks.org and do a search of the Podesta emails for "Kadzik."

And --- ding ding ding - you will see that Kadzik and the Podesta brothers are good friends.

And this my friends is why we are all thankful for social media and Wikileaks and why the mainstream media is the lamestream media.

Yeah. A lot of people know each other. You didn't realize that?

Then they should have the integrity to recuse themselves from certain types of legal and financial investigations to avoid a conflict of interest.

Friendship isn't a basis for conflict of interest recusal. You have no idea what you're talking about. If there's no family relationship or financial interest, the ethical rules say it's fine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow! I honestly don't know how anybody can defend this anymore.

We're not defending it. We're just saying we don't care.

Unitl it affects you and it will be too late?

You can still vote for Hillary, but to say that you don't care about this exposure of Washington corruption? That's crazy.

I don't think Hillary's supporters are crazy, they just ignorant. They don't read the orignial sources or different sources of information. They get their information from 1-2 sites that brainwashed them. And then they take an ostrich position "I don't care" becasue they don't have enough information to make an intelligent decision.

You may be right.

It wasn't a Hillary supporter pointing and screaming "Media Matters David Brock!" when someone pointed out that Kadzik is in no way "in charge of the email probe."

Exactly. This is a stupid bit of nonsense. These guys are friendly -- stop the presses! High powered people in Washington know each other! OP has the vapors!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Really great Guardian article that sums up what these leaked emails illustrate about the 'elites' in power. If you're not in their club, you're screwed. If you're in the club, you get rich and stay protected. Admission to and advancement in the club isn't based on merit:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/31/the-podesta-emails-show-who-runs-america-and-how-they-do-it

Thank you for sharing this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow! I honestly don't know how anybody can defend this anymore.

We're not defending it. We're just saying we don't care.

Unitl it affects you and it will be too late?

You can still vote for Hillary, but to say that you don't care about this exposure of Washington corruption? That's crazy.

I don't think Hillary's supporters are crazy, they just ignorant. They don't read the orignial sources or different sources of information. They get their information from 1-2 sites that brainwashed them. And then they take an ostrich position "I don't care" becasue they don't have enough information to make an intelligent decision.

You may be right.

It wasn't a Hillary supporter pointing and screaming "Media Matters David Brock!" when someone pointed out that Kadzik is in no way "in charge of the email probe."

Exactly. This is a stupid bit of nonsense. These guys are friendly -- stop the presses! High powered people in Washington know each other! OP has the vapors!

i wonder if he'll give Podesta another "heads up" about things in this investigation..or if he has been all along.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:To the person who doesn't care:

It has now been revealed that Kadzik's wife (Amy Weiss) was Deputy Press Secretary to Bill Clinton in the White HOuse--the Clinton administration.

And, now her husband--Podesta's good buddy, who fed him backchannel information--is in charge of the DOJ investigation. No, move along, nothing to see here.

This Amy Weiss relationship is alarming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow! I honestly don't know how anybody can defend this anymore.

We're not defending it. We're just saying we don't care.

Unitl it affects you and it will be too late?

You can still vote for Hillary, but to say that you don't care about this exposure of Washington corruption? That's crazy.

I don't think Hillary's supporters are crazy, they just ignorant. They don't read the orignial sources or different sources of information. They get their information from 1-2 sites that brainwashed them. And then they take an ostrich position "I don't care" becasue they don't have enough information to make an intelligent decision.

You may be right.

It wasn't a Hillary supporter pointing and screaming "Media Matters David Brock!" when someone pointed out that Kadzik is in no way "in charge of the email probe."

Exactly. This is a stupid bit of nonsense. These guys are friendly -- stop the presses! High powered people in Washington know each other! OP has the vapors!

Okay but can we at least apply the same ethics standards to everyone? I get conflicted out of matters for way less than what we're seeing here. No more double standards!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow! I honestly don't know how anybody can defend this anymore.

We're not defending it. We're just saying we don't care.

Unitl it affects you and it will be too late?

You can still vote for Hillary, but to say that you don't care about this exposure of Washington corruption? That's crazy.

I don't think Hillary's supporters are crazy, they just ignorant. They don't read the orignial sources or different sources of information. They get their information from 1-2 sites that brainwashed them. And then they take an ostrich position "I don't care" becasue they don't have enough information to make an intelligent decision.

You may be right.

It wasn't a Hillary supporter pointing and screaming "Media Matters David Brock!" when someone pointed out that Kadzik is in no way "in charge of the email probe."

Exactly. This is a stupid bit of nonsense. These guys are friendly -- stop the presses! High powered people in Washington know each other! OP has the vapors!

i wonder if he'll give Podesta another "heads up" about things in this investigation..or if he has been all along.

I always found it so weird how confident it was that she would not face charges (and not because she's actually innocent).

[Anonymous]

Peter just needs to go.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Peter just needs to go.

It can't happen before the election. Would be viewed as proof of DOJ taint. And Hillary never admits an error. So he's in place for the near term durstion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Really great Guardian article that sums up what these leaked emails illustrate about the 'elites' in power. If you're not in their club, you're screwed. If you're in the club, you get rich and stay protected. Admission to and advancement in the club isn't based on merit:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/31/the-podesta-emails-show-who-runs-america-and-how-they-do-it

As if Trump hasn't spent the entirety of adult life starfucking his way into the same room as the "elites." The unwashed masses don't have their own planes and helps, aren't living in Trump Plaza or buying memberships at Mar-a-Lago or Doral.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really great Guardian article that sums up what these leaked emails illustrate about the 'elites' in power. If you're not in their club, you're screwed. If you're in the club, you get rich and stay protected. Admission to and advancement in the club isn't based on merit:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/31/the-podesta-emails-show-who-runs-america-and-how-they-do-it

As if Trump hasn't spent the entirety of adult life starfucking his way into the same room as the "elites." The unwashed masses don't have their own planes and helps, aren't living in Trump Plaza or buying memberships at Mar-a-Lago or Doral.

Do you suffer from ADD?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Peter just needs to go.

It can't happen before the election. Would be viewed as proof of DOJ taint. And Hillary never admits an error. So he's in place for the near term durstion.

Kadzik is the taint.